Experiences of stigma amongst healthcare professionals working in abortion care: a global survey.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Louise Bury, Roger Ingham, Suzanna Bright, Lesley Hoggart
{"title":"Experiences of stigma amongst healthcare professionals working in abortion care: a global survey.","authors":"Louise Bury, Roger Ingham, Suzanna Bright, Lesley Hoggart","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Abortion-related stigma negatively affects healthcare professionals providing abortion care, threatening workforce well-being and service provision. This global study, part of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists' 'Making Abortion Safe' Project, explored healthcare providers' experiences of abortion stigma, its drivers and mitigating factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A global online survey was distributed to healthcare professionals trained to provide abortion and post-abortion care (PAC) through 16 partner organisations over a 6-week period in 2021. The Abortion Provider Stigma Scale (APSS) was adapted, and linear regression modelling was used to examine the relationships between demographic variables, attitudes towards abortion, workplace burnout and total APSS scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 1674 providers from 77 countries, stigma was universally experienced. Higher stigma levels were associated with countries with restrictive abortion laws; working in non-governmental organisation settings; and providing first- and second-trimester abortions compared with only PAC. A large majority (84%) of providers reported feeling burnout to some degree, with a strong correlation between APSS scores and workplace burnout. Providers exposed to both values clarification and attitude transformation (VCAT) training and other support workshops reported more positive attitudes and lower stigma compared with those with only VCAT or no training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Legal reform is needed to reduce stigma for providers as part of broader initiatives on women's reproductive rights in general. Meanwhile, ongoing support at the organisational level, alongside addressing stigmatising values and attitudes, can help create positive workplaces and resilient providers. Mainstreaming and integrating abortion services into public health systems would also help normalise abortion care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202468","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Abortion-related stigma negatively affects healthcare professionals providing abortion care, threatening workforce well-being and service provision. This global study, part of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists' 'Making Abortion Safe' Project, explored healthcare providers' experiences of abortion stigma, its drivers and mitigating factors.

Methods: A global online survey was distributed to healthcare professionals trained to provide abortion and post-abortion care (PAC) through 16 partner organisations over a 6-week period in 2021. The Abortion Provider Stigma Scale (APSS) was adapted, and linear regression modelling was used to examine the relationships between demographic variables, attitudes towards abortion, workplace burnout and total APSS scores.

Results: In 1674 providers from 77 countries, stigma was universally experienced. Higher stigma levels were associated with countries with restrictive abortion laws; working in non-governmental organisation settings; and providing first- and second-trimester abortions compared with only PAC. A large majority (84%) of providers reported feeling burnout to some degree, with a strong correlation between APSS scores and workplace burnout. Providers exposed to both values clarification and attitude transformation (VCAT) training and other support workshops reported more positive attitudes and lower stigma compared with those with only VCAT or no training.

Conclusions: Legal reform is needed to reduce stigma for providers as part of broader initiatives on women's reproductive rights in general. Meanwhile, ongoing support at the organisational level, alongside addressing stigmatising values and attitudes, can help create positive workplaces and resilient providers. Mainstreaming and integrating abortion services into public health systems would also help normalise abortion care.

从事流产护理的卫生保健专业人员的耻辱经历:一项全球调查。
引言:堕胎相关的污名对提供堕胎护理的医疗保健专业人员产生负面影响,威胁到劳动力福利和服务提供。这项全球研究是皇家妇产科学院“使堕胎安全”项目的一部分,探讨了医疗保健提供者对堕胎耻辱的经历、其驱动因素和缓解因素。方法:在2021年为期6周的时间里,通过16个合作组织向接受过堕胎和堕胎后护理(PAC)培训的医疗保健专业人员分发了一项全球在线调查。采用人工流产服务提供者污名量表(APSS),采用线性回归模型检验人口统计学变量、人工流产态度、职场倦怠与APSS总分之间的关系。结果:来自77个国家的1674名医护人员普遍存在病耻感。在有限制性堕胎法的国家,污名化程度越高;在非政府组织工作;绝大多数(84%)的提供者报告说,他们在某种程度上感到倦怠,APSS分数与工作倦怠之间存在很强的相关性。接受价值观澄清和态度转变(VCAT)培训和其他支持研讨会的提供者报告说,与只接受VCAT或没有接受培训的人相比,他们的态度更积极,耻辱感更低。结论:作为有关妇女生殖权利的更广泛倡议的一部分,需要进行法律改革以减少提供者的耻辱。与此同时,组织层面的持续支持,以及解决污名化的价值观和态度,可以帮助创造积极的工作场所和有弹性的提供者。将堕胎服务纳入公共卫生系统的主流和整合也将有助于使堕胎护理正常化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health is a multiprofessional journal that promotes sexual and reproductive health and wellbeing, and best contraceptive practice, worldwide. It publishes research, debate and comment to inform policy and practice, and recognises the importance of professional-patient partnership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信