Training programmes for healthcare professionals in managing epidural analgesia: A scoping review.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Cornelia Charlotte Lamprecht, Morten Vester-Andersen, Thordis Thomsen, Tanja Eg Thomsen, Anne Mørup-Petersen, Kim Wildgaard
{"title":"Training programmes for healthcare professionals in managing epidural analgesia: A scoping review.","authors":"Cornelia Charlotte Lamprecht, Morten Vester-Andersen, Thordis Thomsen, Tanja Eg Thomsen, Anne Mørup-Petersen, Kim Wildgaard","doi":"10.1111/aas.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epidural analgesia (EA) is widely used for postoperative and labour pain management. Systematic training of healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, is essential for the safe administration and management. This scoping review aimed to identify and map existing EA training programmes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA-ScR-guided search was conducted across multiple databases and grey literature. Studies on educational interventions for healthcare professionals in EA management were included. Data extraction and categorisation were performed using Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training Evaluation Model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies were included, covering classroom training, workshops, self-directed learning, simulation-based training, and on-the-job training. Participants were primarily nurses. Programmes addressed epidural techniques, monitoring and assessment, spinal anatomy and pharmacology, complication management, and patient care. Most studies focused on short-term knowledge gains, with a limited assessment of long-term clinical impacts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Limited research exists on EA training, with most programmes targeting nurses and relying on classroom-based training. Training structures varied, and evaluations primarily assessed short-term knowledge gains.</p><p><strong>Editorial comment: </strong>The authors conducted a literature search to get an overview of programmes that aimed to train healthcare staff in managing epidural pain relief. Most of the identified 18 studies described classroom teaching and focused primarily on knowledge about complications. Patient contact in this type of training was not reported. The effectiveness of this type of training in a clinical context was difficult to evaluate based on the published evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 4","pages":"e70025"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Epidural analgesia (EA) is widely used for postoperative and labour pain management. Systematic training of healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, is essential for the safe administration and management. This scoping review aimed to identify and map existing EA training programmes.

Methods: A PRISMA-ScR-guided search was conducted across multiple databases and grey literature. Studies on educational interventions for healthcare professionals in EA management were included. Data extraction and categorisation were performed using Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training Evaluation Model.

Results: Eighteen studies were included, covering classroom training, workshops, self-directed learning, simulation-based training, and on-the-job training. Participants were primarily nurses. Programmes addressed epidural techniques, monitoring and assessment, spinal anatomy and pharmacology, complication management, and patient care. Most studies focused on short-term knowledge gains, with a limited assessment of long-term clinical impacts.

Conclusion: Limited research exists on EA training, with most programmes targeting nurses and relying on classroom-based training. Training structures varied, and evaluations primarily assessed short-term knowledge gains.

Editorial comment: The authors conducted a literature search to get an overview of programmes that aimed to train healthcare staff in managing epidural pain relief. Most of the identified 18 studies described classroom teaching and focused primarily on knowledge about complications. Patient contact in this type of training was not reported. The effectiveness of this type of training in a clinical context was difficult to evaluate based on the published evidence.

医护人员硬膜外镇痛管理培训计划:范围综述。
背景:硬膜外镇痛(EA)广泛应用于术后和分娩疼痛管理。系统地培训卫生保健专业人员,特别是护士,对安全行政和管理至关重要。这一范围审查的目的是确定和绘制现有的环境评估培训方案。方法:在多个数据库和灰色文献中进行prisma - scr引导的检索。包括对医疗保健专业人员进行EA管理的教育干预的研究。数据提取和分类使用柯克帕特里克的四级培训评估模型进行。结果:纳入18项研究,涵盖课堂培训、工作坊、自主学习、模拟培训和在职培训。参与者主要是护士。规划涉及硬膜外技术、监测和评估、脊柱解剖和药理学、并发症管理和患者护理。大多数研究关注的是短期的知识收获,对长期临床影响的评估有限。结论:对EA培训的研究有限,大多数培训项目以护士为对象,依赖于课堂培训。培训结构各不相同,评估主要评估短期的知识收获。编辑评论:作者进行了文献检索,以获得旨在培训医护人员管理硬膜外疼痛缓解方案的概述。所确定的18项研究中,大多数描述的是课堂教学,主要关注的是有关并发症的知识。在这类培训中没有患者接触的报道。基于已发表的证据,这种类型的培训在临床环境中的有效性很难评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信