Predicting Pharmacokinetics in Rats Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Study Between Empirical, Compartmental, and PBPK-Based Approaches

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Moritz Walter, Ghaith Aljayyoussi, Bettina Gerner, Hermann Rapp, Christofer S. Tautermann, Pavel Balazki, Miha Skalic, Jens M. Borghardt, Lina Humbeck
{"title":"Predicting Pharmacokinetics in Rats Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Study Between Empirical, Compartmental, and PBPK-Based Approaches","authors":"Moritz Walter,&nbsp;Ghaith Aljayyoussi,&nbsp;Bettina Gerner,&nbsp;Hermann Rapp,&nbsp;Christofer S. Tautermann,&nbsp;Pavel Balazki,&nbsp;Miha Skalic,&nbsp;Jens M. Borghardt,&nbsp;Lina Humbeck","doi":"10.1111/cts.70150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A successful drug needs to combine several properties including high potency and good pharmacokinetic (PK) properties to sustain efficacious plasma concentration over time. To estimate required doses for preclinical animal efficacy models or for the clinics, in vivo PK studies need to be conducted. Although the prediction of ADME properties of compounds using machine learning (ML) models based on chemical structures is well established in drug discovery, the prediction of complete plasma concentration–time profiles has only recently gained attention. In this study, we systematically compare various approaches that integrate ML models with empiric or mechanistic PK models to predict PK profiles in rats after intravenous administration prior to synthesis. More specifically, we compare a standard noncompartmental analysis (NCA)-based approach (prediction of CL and V<sub>ss</sub>), a pure ML approach (non-mechanistic PK description), a compartmental modeling approach, and a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) approach. Our study based on internal preclinical data shows that the latter three approaches yield PK profile predictions of comparable accuracy across a large data set (evaluated as geometric mean fold errors for each profile of over 1000 small molecules). In summary, we demonstrate the improved ability to prioritize drug candidates with desirable PK properties prior to synthesis with ML predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70150","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A successful drug needs to combine several properties including high potency and good pharmacokinetic (PK) properties to sustain efficacious plasma concentration over time. To estimate required doses for preclinical animal efficacy models or for the clinics, in vivo PK studies need to be conducted. Although the prediction of ADME properties of compounds using machine learning (ML) models based on chemical structures is well established in drug discovery, the prediction of complete plasma concentration–time profiles has only recently gained attention. In this study, we systematically compare various approaches that integrate ML models with empiric or mechanistic PK models to predict PK profiles in rats after intravenous administration prior to synthesis. More specifically, we compare a standard noncompartmental analysis (NCA)-based approach (prediction of CL and Vss), a pure ML approach (non-mechanistic PK description), a compartmental modeling approach, and a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) approach. Our study based on internal preclinical data shows that the latter three approaches yield PK profile predictions of comparable accuracy across a large data set (evaluated as geometric mean fold errors for each profile of over 1000 small molecules). In summary, we demonstrate the improved ability to prioritize drug candidates with desirable PK properties prior to synthesis with ML predictions.

Abstract Image

使用机器学习预测大鼠药代动力学:经验、区隔和基于pbpc的方法之间的比较研究
一种成功的药物需要结合多种特性,包括高效能和良好的药代动力学(PK)特性,以维持有效的血浆浓度。为了估计临床前动物疗效模型或临床所需的剂量,需要进行体内PK研究。尽管利用基于化学结构的机器学习(ML)模型预测化合物的ADME特性在药物发现中已经很好地建立起来,但预测完整的血浆浓度-时间谱直到最近才引起人们的注意。在这项研究中,我们系统地比较了将ML模型与经验性或机械性PK模型相结合的各种方法,以预测大鼠在合成前静脉给药后的PK谱。更具体地说,我们比较了基于标准非区室分析(NCA)的方法(预测CL和Vss)、纯ML方法(非机械性PK描述)、区室建模方法和基于生理学的药代动力学(PBPK)方法。我们基于内部临床前数据的研究表明,后三种方法在大型数据集上产生具有相当准确性的PK谱预测(评估为超过1000个小分子的每个谱的几何平均折叠误差)。总之,我们证明了在ML预测合成之前优先考虑具有理想PK特性的候选药物的能力得到了提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信