Use of propidium monoazide coupled with real-time PCR methodology to evaluate Escherichia coli O157 lethality in beef burgers after organic acid addition
María de los Angeles Rey, Mariana Cap, Leonardo Cristian Favre, Sergio Ramon Vaudagna, Marina Valeria Mozgovoj
{"title":"Use of propidium monoazide coupled with real-time PCR methodology to evaluate Escherichia coli O157 lethality in beef burgers after organic acid addition","authors":"María de los Angeles Rey, Mariana Cap, Leonardo Cristian Favre, Sergio Ramon Vaudagna, Marina Valeria Mozgovoj","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In order to achieve bacterial inactivation in beef burgers, one of the alternatives proposed is to add organic acids as part of their formulation. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effectiveness of propidium monoazide coupled to qPCR (PMA-qPCR) as counting methodology to assess the addition of lactic acid (LA), caprylic acid, and fumaric acid (FA) alone and combined as inactivation agents on <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157 (both non-toxigenic and Shiga toxin-producing <i>E. coli</i>-[STEC]-strains). The effects on physicochemical properties were also evaluated. PMA-qPCR targeting <i>stx<sub>2</sub></i> and <i>uidA</i> genes allows quantifying STEC and non-toxigenic <i>E. coli</i> O157. The most effective acid combination was LA + FA for non-toxigenic <i>E. coli</i> O157 with a reduction of 1.06 log CFU/g measured by PMA-qPCR. However, this treatment increased hardness and chewiness once the beef burgers were cooked. Moreover, cooking weight loss was negatively affected by the addition of all organic acids tested. PMA-qPCR methodology permits to detect and quantify viable but nonculturable <i>E. coli</i> O157 in the beef burgers, a common limitation encountered in the traditional plate count method. The presence of bacteria in this metabolic state could explain differences among the values obtained by both methodologies. Addition of organic acids to beef burger formulations was not as effective as expected to inactivate <i>E. coli</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70109","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In order to achieve bacterial inactivation in beef burgers, one of the alternatives proposed is to add organic acids as part of their formulation. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effectiveness of propidium monoazide coupled to qPCR (PMA-qPCR) as counting methodology to assess the addition of lactic acid (LA), caprylic acid, and fumaric acid (FA) alone and combined as inactivation agents on Escherichia coli O157 (both non-toxigenic and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli-[STEC]-strains). The effects on physicochemical properties were also evaluated. PMA-qPCR targeting stx2 and uidA genes allows quantifying STEC and non-toxigenic E. coli O157. The most effective acid combination was LA + FA for non-toxigenic E. coli O157 with a reduction of 1.06 log CFU/g measured by PMA-qPCR. However, this treatment increased hardness and chewiness once the beef burgers were cooked. Moreover, cooking weight loss was negatively affected by the addition of all organic acids tested. PMA-qPCR methodology permits to detect and quantify viable but nonculturable E. coli O157 in the beef burgers, a common limitation encountered in the traditional plate count method. The presence of bacteria in this metabolic state could explain differences among the values obtained by both methodologies. Addition of organic acids to beef burger formulations was not as effective as expected to inactivate E. coli.
期刊介绍:
The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science.
The range of topics covered in the journal include:
-Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science
-New Horizons in Food Research
-Integrated Food Science
-Food Chemistry
-Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology
-Food Microbiology and Safety
-Sensory and Consumer Sciences
-Health, Nutrition, and Food
-Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety
The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.