Use of propidium monoazide coupled with real-time PCR methodology to evaluate Escherichia coli O157 lethality in beef burgers after organic acid addition

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
María de los Angeles Rey, Mariana Cap, Leonardo Cristian Favre, Sergio Ramon Vaudagna, Marina Valeria Mozgovoj
{"title":"Use of propidium monoazide coupled with real-time PCR methodology to evaluate Escherichia coli O157 lethality in beef burgers after organic acid addition","authors":"María de los Angeles Rey,&nbsp;Mariana Cap,&nbsp;Leonardo Cristian Favre,&nbsp;Sergio Ramon Vaudagna,&nbsp;Marina Valeria Mozgovoj","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In order to achieve bacterial inactivation in beef burgers, one of the alternatives proposed is to add organic acids as part of their formulation. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effectiveness of propidium monoazide coupled to qPCR (PMA-qPCR) as counting methodology to assess the addition of lactic acid (LA), caprylic acid, and fumaric acid (FA) alone and combined as inactivation agents on <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157 (both non-toxigenic and Shiga toxin-producing <i>E. coli</i>-[STEC]-strains). The effects on physicochemical properties were also evaluated. PMA-qPCR targeting <i>stx<sub>2</sub></i> and <i>uidA</i> genes allows quantifying STEC and non-toxigenic <i>E. coli</i> O157. The most effective acid combination was LA + FA for non-toxigenic <i>E. coli</i> O157 with a reduction of 1.06 log CFU/g measured by PMA-qPCR. However, this treatment increased hardness and chewiness once the beef burgers were cooked. Moreover, cooking weight loss was negatively affected by the addition of all organic acids tested. PMA-qPCR methodology permits to detect and quantify viable but nonculturable <i>E. coli</i> O157 in the beef burgers, a common limitation encountered in the traditional plate count method. The presence of bacteria in this metabolic state could explain differences among the values obtained by both methodologies. Addition of organic acids to beef burger formulations was not as effective as expected to inactivate <i>E. coli</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70109","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to achieve bacterial inactivation in beef burgers, one of the alternatives proposed is to add organic acids as part of their formulation. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effectiveness of propidium monoazide coupled to qPCR (PMA-qPCR) as counting methodology to assess the addition of lactic acid (LA), caprylic acid, and fumaric acid (FA) alone and combined as inactivation agents on Escherichia coli O157 (both non-toxigenic and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli-[STEC]-strains). The effects on physicochemical properties were also evaluated. PMA-qPCR targeting stx2 and uidA genes allows quantifying STEC and non-toxigenic E. coli O157. The most effective acid combination was LA + FA for non-toxigenic E. coli O157 with a reduction of 1.06 log CFU/g measured by PMA-qPCR. However, this treatment increased hardness and chewiness once the beef burgers were cooked. Moreover, cooking weight loss was negatively affected by the addition of all organic acids tested. PMA-qPCR methodology permits to detect and quantify viable but nonculturable E. coli O157 in the beef burgers, a common limitation encountered in the traditional plate count method. The presence of bacteria in this metabolic state could explain differences among the values obtained by both methodologies. Addition of organic acids to beef burger formulations was not as effective as expected to inactivate E. coli.

使用单氮化丙啶和实时 PCR 方法评估添加有机酸后牛肉汉堡中大肠埃希氏菌 O157 的致死率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science
Journal of Food Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science. The range of topics covered in the journal include: -Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science -New Horizons in Food Research -Integrated Food Science -Food Chemistry -Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology -Food Microbiology and Safety -Sensory and Consumer Sciences -Health, Nutrition, and Food -Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信