Anne J. Jefferson , Kayla Kearns , Kylie Snyder , Alexis Mitchell , Sophia Muratori , Christopher J. Rowan
{"title":"Anthropogenic litter and plastics across size classes on a mechanically groomed Great Lakes urban beach","authors":"Anne J. Jefferson , Kayla Kearns , Kylie Snyder , Alexis Mitchell , Sophia Muratori , Christopher J. Rowan","doi":"10.1016/j.jglr.2024.102505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anthropogenic litter and plastic pollution are well-recognized global and Great Lakes stressors, but the distribution of plastic pollution on shorelines is uneven. Beaches in urban areas are close to many potential sources of plastic pollution and often heavily visited, so are likely exposed to high litter inputs. Conversely, beach maintenance activities, including mechanical grooming, may lower litter concentrations. In the summer of 2021, surface litter and > 2 mm anthropogenic materials within the top 5 cm of beach sediment were repeatedly measured along 10 transects at Euclid Beach, in Cleveland, Ohio. Plastics comprised 79 % of litter > 50 mm and 100 % of smaller visible litter on the beach surface. Surface litter concentrations (0.279 pieces m<sup>−2</sup>) were relatively low compared to previously studied Great Lakes strandlines, with mechanical grooming and beach visitor usage influencing litter distribution. However, when plastics within the top 5 cm of the beach sediment were included, Euclid Beach microplastics (54.7 pieces m<sup>−2</sup>) and mesoplastics (45.0 pieces m<sup>−2</sup>) concentrations were among the highest in the Great Lakes. Plastic production pellets were the most common microplastic morphology, while foamed plastics were the most common mesoplastics. Most plastics in the sediment were too small to be removed by mechanical grooming, but fragmentation of larger, weathered plastics is a potential concern deserving further investigation. Overall, our results suggest that urban, mechanically-groomed beaches can have high plastics loads. Such beaches should be strategically included in larger scale studies of plastic pollution along shorelines, especially when considering issues of environmental justice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","volume":"51 2","pages":"Article 102505"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0380133024002715","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Anthropogenic litter and plastic pollution are well-recognized global and Great Lakes stressors, but the distribution of plastic pollution on shorelines is uneven. Beaches in urban areas are close to many potential sources of plastic pollution and often heavily visited, so are likely exposed to high litter inputs. Conversely, beach maintenance activities, including mechanical grooming, may lower litter concentrations. In the summer of 2021, surface litter and > 2 mm anthropogenic materials within the top 5 cm of beach sediment were repeatedly measured along 10 transects at Euclid Beach, in Cleveland, Ohio. Plastics comprised 79 % of litter > 50 mm and 100 % of smaller visible litter on the beach surface. Surface litter concentrations (0.279 pieces m−2) were relatively low compared to previously studied Great Lakes strandlines, with mechanical grooming and beach visitor usage influencing litter distribution. However, when plastics within the top 5 cm of the beach sediment were included, Euclid Beach microplastics (54.7 pieces m−2) and mesoplastics (45.0 pieces m−2) concentrations were among the highest in the Great Lakes. Plastic production pellets were the most common microplastic morphology, while foamed plastics were the most common mesoplastics. Most plastics in the sediment were too small to be removed by mechanical grooming, but fragmentation of larger, weathered plastics is a potential concern deserving further investigation. Overall, our results suggest that urban, mechanically-groomed beaches can have high plastics loads. Such beaches should be strategically included in larger scale studies of plastic pollution along shorelines, especially when considering issues of environmental justice.
期刊介绍:
Published six times per year, the Journal of Great Lakes Research is multidisciplinary in its coverage, publishing manuscripts on a wide range of theoretical and applied topics in the natural science fields of biology, chemistry, physics, geology, as well as social sciences of the large lakes of the world and their watersheds. Large lakes generally are considered as those lakes which have a mean surface area of >500 km2 (see Herdendorf, C.E. 1982. Large lakes of the world. J. Great Lakes Res. 8:379-412, for examples), although smaller lakes may be considered, especially if they are very deep. We also welcome contributions on saline lakes and research on estuarine waters where the results have application to large lakes.