Perioperative Management of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients having a High-Bleed-Risk Surgery or Neuraxial Procedure: The PAUSE-2 Pilot Randomized Trial.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
James D Douketis, Na Li, Melanie St John, Joanne Nixon, Karen Moffat, Joseph Shaw, Summer Syed, Sam Schulman, Peter L Gross, Alex C Spyropoulos
{"title":"Perioperative Management of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients having a High-Bleed-Risk Surgery or Neuraxial Procedure: The PAUSE-2 Pilot Randomized Trial.","authors":"James D Douketis, Na Li, Melanie St John, Joanne Nixon, Karen Moffat, Joseph Shaw, Summer Syed, Sam Schulman, Peter L Gross, Alex C Spyropoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.jtha.2025.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is uncertainty about the perioperative management of patients who are receiving a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and require an elective high-bleed-risk surgery, including those who are undergoing a neuraxial or deep peripheral nerve block procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE)-2 pilot trial was a proof-of-concept, open-label, randomized controlled trial that assessed the feasibility of comparing perioperative DOAC management using an American Society of Regional Anesthesia (ASRA)-based or PAUSE-based approach in patients with atrial fibrillation who needed an elective high-bleed-risk surgery/procedure and/or any neuraxial anesthesia/procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 159 patients enrolled (86 on apixaban, 12 on dabigatran, and 61 on rivaroxaban), of whom 141 had pre-operative DOAC level testing done. The median (IQR) residual DOAC level was 19 (19-24) ng/mL in the ASRA group, and 20 (19-24) ng/mL in the PAUSE group (standardized difference=-0.02). The percentage of patients in the ASRA and PAUSE groups with pre-operative residual DOAC levels <30 ng/mL was 95.6% and 94.4%; the percentage with residual DOAC levels 30-50 ng/mL was 1.4% and 2.8%, and the percentage with levels >50 ng/mL was 2.9% and 2.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this pilot trial, we found that recruitment of DOAC-treated patients who needed an elective high-bleed-risk surgery or neuraxial procedure was feasible and that pre-operative residual DOAC levels appeared similar according to ASRA-based and PAUSE-based management approaches, providing the foundation for a larger trial comparing ASRA- and PAUSE-based perioperative DOAC management.</p>","PeriodicalId":17326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2025.03.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is uncertainty about the perioperative management of patients who are receiving a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and require an elective high-bleed-risk surgery, including those who are undergoing a neuraxial or deep peripheral nerve block procedure.

Methods: The Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE)-2 pilot trial was a proof-of-concept, open-label, randomized controlled trial that assessed the feasibility of comparing perioperative DOAC management using an American Society of Regional Anesthesia (ASRA)-based or PAUSE-based approach in patients with atrial fibrillation who needed an elective high-bleed-risk surgery/procedure and/or any neuraxial anesthesia/procedure.

Results: There were 159 patients enrolled (86 on apixaban, 12 on dabigatran, and 61 on rivaroxaban), of whom 141 had pre-operative DOAC level testing done. The median (IQR) residual DOAC level was 19 (19-24) ng/mL in the ASRA group, and 20 (19-24) ng/mL in the PAUSE group (standardized difference=-0.02). The percentage of patients in the ASRA and PAUSE groups with pre-operative residual DOAC levels <30 ng/mL was 95.6% and 94.4%; the percentage with residual DOAC levels 30-50 ng/mL was 1.4% and 2.8%, and the percentage with levels >50 ng/mL was 2.9% and 2.8%.

Conclusion: In this pilot trial, we found that recruitment of DOAC-treated patients who needed an elective high-bleed-risk surgery or neuraxial procedure was feasible and that pre-operative residual DOAC levels appeared similar according to ASRA-based and PAUSE-based management approaches, providing the foundation for a larger trial comparing ASRA- and PAUSE-based perioperative DOAC management.

高出血风险手术或轴向手术患者直接口服抗凝剂的围手术期管理:PAUSE-2随机试验
背景:接受直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)并需要选择性高出血风险手术的患者的围手术期管理存在不确定性,包括那些正在接受轴神经或深周围神经阻滞手术的患者。方法:围术期抗凝剂手术应用评估(PAUSE)-2试点试验是一项概念验证、开放标签、随机对照试验,评估了在需要选择性高出血风险手术/手术和/或任何轴向麻醉/手术的心房纤颤患者中,采用基于美国区域麻醉学会(ASRA)或基于PAUSE的方法比较围术期DOAC管理的可行性。结果:共纳入159例患者(阿哌沙班86例,达比加群12例,利伐沙班61例),其中141例患者术前DOAC水平检测。ASRA组的中位(IQR)残留DOAC水平为19 (19-24)ng/mL, PAUSE组为20 (19-24)ng/mL(标准化差=-0.02)。ASRA组和PAUSE组患者术前DOAC残留水平为50 ng/mL的比例分别为2.9%和2.8%。结论:在这项试点试验中,我们发现需要选择性高风险手术或轴向手术的DOAC治疗患者的招募是可行的,并且基于ASRA和基于pause的管理方法的术前残留DOAC水平相似,为更大规模的比较基于ASRA和基于pause的围手术期DOAC管理的试验提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
24.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (JTH) serves as the official journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. It is dedicated to advancing science related to thrombosis, bleeding disorders, and vascular biology through the dissemination and exchange of information and ideas within the global research community. Types of Publications: The journal publishes a variety of content, including: Original research reports State-of-the-art reviews Brief reports Case reports Invited commentaries on publications in the Journal Forum articles Correspondence Announcements Scope of Contributions: Editors invite contributions from both fundamental and clinical domains. These include: Basic manuscripts on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis Studies on proteins and reactions related to thrombosis and haemostasis Research on blood platelets and their interactions with other biological systems, such as the vessel wall, blood cells, and invading organisms Clinical manuscripts covering various topics including venous thrombosis, arterial disease, hemophilia, bleeding disorders, and platelet diseases Clinical manuscripts may encompass etiology, diagnostics, prognosis, prevention, and treatment strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信