Patient and healthcare providers' perspectives on participation in a postpartum pilot trial of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: a qualitative study.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Lauren Andrew, Alexandra Garven, Taryn S Taylor, Shannon M Bates, Lisa Duffett, Suzanne Dubois, A Kinga Malinowski, Darine El-Chaâr, Wee-Shian Chan, Jennifer Donnelly, Céline Chauleur, Wessel Ganzevoort, Claire McCarthy, Hanke Wiegers, Fionnuala Ní Áinle, Andrea Buchmuller, Paul S Gibson, Saskia Middeldorp, Marc A Rodger, Leslie Skeith
{"title":"Patient and healthcare providers' perspectives on participation in a postpartum pilot trial of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: a qualitative study.","authors":"Lauren Andrew, Alexandra Garven, Taryn S Taylor, Shannon M Bates, Lisa Duffett, Suzanne Dubois, A Kinga Malinowski, Darine El-Chaâr, Wee-Shian Chan, Jennifer Donnelly, Céline Chauleur, Wessel Ganzevoort, Claire McCarthy, Hanke Wiegers, Fionnuala Ní Áinle, Andrea Buchmuller, Paul S Gibson, Saskia Middeldorp, Marc A Rodger, Leslie Skeith","doi":"10.1016/j.jtha.2025.02.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a need to better understand barriers to recruitment and participation in randomized controlled trials evaluating postpartum thromboprophylaxis, as previous trials had low recruitment and were not feasible.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In a qualitative interview study of a feasibility trial of low-dose aspirin vs placebo for 6 weeks postpartum (pilot PARTUM (Postpartum Aspirin to Reduce Thromboembolism Undue Morbidity) trial), we explored the facilitators and barriers to trial involvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients eligible for the pilot PARTUM trial, including those who declined to join the trial, were invited to participate in a qualitative study. Physicians whose clinical practice included caring for eligible patients were also invited to participate. Thirty-minute semistructured interviews were conducted by 2 researchers. Data were analyzed iteratively using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 19 patients and 13 physician interviews conducted at a single Canadian center. Nine pilot PARTUM participants and 10 nonparticipants were included. Patients identified the simple study design and familiar oral medication (\"Participating as an Easy Ask\") and helping other parents (\"Helping Other Parents by Providing Knowledge\") as facilitators to participate in the trial. Most patients invoked altruism; however, their decision to participate in the trial was influenced by their perception of venous thromboembolism risk (\"Venous Thromboembolism Risk Perception and Communication\"), their birth experience (\"Birth Experience Informs Perspective\"), and their opinion of their obstetrical care provider (\"Engaging Trusted Care Providers\").</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trial participation is uniquely affected by experiences during pregnancy, delivery, and new parenthood. Improved understanding of the factors most important to patients will inform the design and conduct of future patient-focused clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":17326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2025.02.039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a need to better understand barriers to recruitment and participation in randomized controlled trials evaluating postpartum thromboprophylaxis, as previous trials had low recruitment and were not feasible.

Objectives: In a qualitative interview study of a feasibility trial of low-dose aspirin vs placebo for 6 weeks postpartum (pilot PARTUM (Postpartum Aspirin to Reduce Thromboembolism Undue Morbidity) trial), we explored the facilitators and barriers to trial involvement.

Methods: Patients eligible for the pilot PARTUM trial, including those who declined to join the trial, were invited to participate in a qualitative study. Physicians whose clinical practice included caring for eligible patients were also invited to participate. Thirty-minute semistructured interviews were conducted by 2 researchers. Data were analyzed iteratively using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: There were 19 patients and 13 physician interviews conducted at a single Canadian center. Nine pilot PARTUM participants and 10 nonparticipants were included. Patients identified the simple study design and familiar oral medication ("Participating as an Easy Ask") and helping other parents ("Helping Other Parents by Providing Knowledge") as facilitators to participate in the trial. Most patients invoked altruism; however, their decision to participate in the trial was influenced by their perception of venous thromboembolism risk ("Venous Thromboembolism Risk Perception and Communication"), their birth experience ("Birth Experience Informs Perspective"), and their opinion of their obstetrical care provider ("Engaging Trusted Care Providers").

Conclusion: Trial participation is uniquely affected by experiences during pregnancy, delivery, and new parenthood. Improved understanding of the factors most important to patients will inform the design and conduct of future patient-focused clinical trials.

患者和医疗保健提供者对参与产后静脉血栓栓塞预防试点试验的看法:一项定性研究。
背景:有必要更好地了解招募和参与评估产后血栓预防的随机对照试验(rct)的障碍,因为以前的试验招募率低,不可行。在一项产前试验(产后6周低剂量阿司匹林与安慰剂的可行性试验)的定性访谈研究中,我们探讨了参与试验的促进因素和障碍。方法:有资格参加产前试验的患者,包括那些拒绝参加试验的患者,被邀请参加一项定性研究。临床实践包括照顾符合条件的患者的医生也被邀请参加。两名研究人员进行了30分钟的半结构化访谈。数据采用反身性主题分析法进行迭代分析。结果:在一个加拿大中心进行了19名患者和13名医生访谈。包括9名产后护理试点参与者和10名非参与者。患者认为简单的研究设计和熟悉的口服药物(“参与作为一个简单的问题”)和帮助其他父母(“通过提供知识帮助其他父母”)作为参与试验的促进因素。大多数病人都表现出利他主义;然而,他们参加试验的决定受到他们对静脉血栓栓塞风险的感知(“静脉血栓栓塞风险感知和沟通”)、他们的分娩经历(“分娩经历告知观点”)和他们的产科护理提供者的意见(“参与值得信赖的护理提供者”)的影响。结论:试验参与受怀孕、分娩和初为父母期间经历的独特影响。更好地了解对患者最重要的因素将为未来以患者为中心的临床试验的设计和实施提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
24.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (JTH) serves as the official journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. It is dedicated to advancing science related to thrombosis, bleeding disorders, and vascular biology through the dissemination and exchange of information and ideas within the global research community. Types of Publications: The journal publishes a variety of content, including: Original research reports State-of-the-art reviews Brief reports Case reports Invited commentaries on publications in the Journal Forum articles Correspondence Announcements Scope of Contributions: Editors invite contributions from both fundamental and clinical domains. These include: Basic manuscripts on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis Studies on proteins and reactions related to thrombosis and haemostasis Research on blood platelets and their interactions with other biological systems, such as the vessel wall, blood cells, and invading organisms Clinical manuscripts covering various topics including venous thrombosis, arterial disease, hemophilia, bleeding disorders, and platelet diseases Clinical manuscripts may encompass etiology, diagnostics, prognosis, prevention, and treatment strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信