Closing the gap in kidney disease: validating the reporting of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander identification in a clinical quality registry using linked data

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Heather J Baldwin, Nicole De La Mata, Grant Sara, Faye McMillan, Brett Biles, Jianyun Wu, Paul Lawton, Stephen McDonald, Angela C Webster
{"title":"Closing the gap in kidney disease: validating the reporting of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander identification in a clinical quality registry using linked data","authors":"Heather J Baldwin,&nbsp;Nicole De La Mata,&nbsp;Grant Sara,&nbsp;Faye McMillan,&nbsp;Brett Biles,&nbsp;Jianyun Wu,&nbsp;Paul Lawton,&nbsp;Stephen McDonald,&nbsp;Angela C Webster","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To examine the accuracy of the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), the population-based clinical quality registry for people with kidney failure, in identifying Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Population-based cohort study of reporting accuracy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>New South Wales, 2006–2020.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Incident kidney failure patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\n \n <p>Sensitivity and specificity of identification of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people in ANZDATA compared with identification with Enhanced Reporting of Aboriginality (ERA) methods using linked health datasets.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 11 708 patients, 693 (5.9%) were identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people using ERA methods, with 484 recognised in ANZDATA. Overall ANZDATA sensitivity was 67.0% (95% CI, 63.3–70.5%), with high specificity (99.8%; 95% CI, 99.7–99.9%). Sensitivity was lowest for males (63.8%; 95% CI, 58.7–68.6), people aged under 18 years (45.0%; 95% CI, 23.1–68.5%) or over 65 years (61.7%; 95% CI, 53.8–69.2%), and those with greater socio-economic advantage (56.6%; 95% CI, 46.6–66.2%), living in major cities (53.8%; 95% CI, 48.0–59.5%) and with no comorbidities (47.7%; 95% CI, 37.0–58.6%). Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people identified in ANZDATA had lower rates of waitlisting for kidney transplantation (17.8% <i>v</i> 25.3%; <i>P</i> = 0.016) and receiving a kidney transplant (12.2% <i>v</i> 23.1%; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and a higher rate of death (56.0% <i>v</i> 44.5%; <i>P</i> = 0.004) compared with those not recognised in ANZDATA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people were under-reported in ANZDATA. There were multiple biases in characteristics and outcomes for people identified in ANZDATA compared with those identified by ERA using linked data. This highlights the importance of data integration as a quality improvement mechanism and identifying barriers to disclosure.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"222 5","pages":"240-248"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52613","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52613","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine the accuracy of the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), the population-based clinical quality registry for people with kidney failure, in identifying Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people.

Design

Population-based cohort study of reporting accuracy.

Setting

New South Wales, 2006–2020.

Participants

Incident kidney failure patients.

Main outcome measures

Sensitivity and specificity of identification of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people in ANZDATA compared with identification with Enhanced Reporting of Aboriginality (ERA) methods using linked health datasets.

Results

Of 11 708 patients, 693 (5.9%) were identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people using ERA methods, with 484 recognised in ANZDATA. Overall ANZDATA sensitivity was 67.0% (95% CI, 63.3–70.5%), with high specificity (99.8%; 95% CI, 99.7–99.9%). Sensitivity was lowest for males (63.8%; 95% CI, 58.7–68.6), people aged under 18 years (45.0%; 95% CI, 23.1–68.5%) or over 65 years (61.7%; 95% CI, 53.8–69.2%), and those with greater socio-economic advantage (56.6%; 95% CI, 46.6–66.2%), living in major cities (53.8%; 95% CI, 48.0–59.5%) and with no comorbidities (47.7%; 95% CI, 37.0–58.6%). Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people identified in ANZDATA had lower rates of waitlisting for kidney transplantation (17.8% v 25.3%; P = 0.016) and receiving a kidney transplant (12.2% v 23.1%; P < 0.001) and a higher rate of death (56.0% v 44.5%; P = 0.004) compared with those not recognised in ANZDATA.

Conclusion

Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people were under-reported in ANZDATA. There were multiple biases in characteristics and outcomes for people identified in ANZDATA compared with those identified by ERA using linked data. This highlights the importance of data integration as a quality improvement mechanism and identifying barriers to disclosure.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信