A novel group decision-making method for incomplete interval-valued intuitionistic multiplicative linguistic preference relations

IF 8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Tao Li , Liyuan Zhang
{"title":"A novel group decision-making method for incomplete interval-valued intuitionistic multiplicative linguistic preference relations","authors":"Tao Li ,&nbsp;Liyuan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>By conducting pairwise comparisons, decision-makers can construct interval-valued intuitionistic multiplicative linguistic preference relations (IVIMLPRs) to express the asymmetrically uncertain preferred and non-preferred qualitative judgments. Based on the consistency and consensus analysis, this paper proposes a new group decision-making (GDM) method with incomplete IVIMLPRs. Firstly, a reasonable and rational concept for IVIMLPR is defined. Inspired by the consistent intuitionistic multiplicative linguistic preference relations (IMLPRs), the consistency of IVIMLPRs is expressed by considering the corresponding lower and upper IMLPRs. After that, the acceptably consistent IVIMLPR is further introduced. Based on these concepts, two optimization models are constructed to estimate the missing linguistic variables and adjust an unacceptably consistent IVIMLPR, respectively. To obtain the priority weights from IVIMLPR in a reliable way, the consistency modeling method is employed. Before calculating the collective IVIMLPR, the weights of decision-makers are determined. Subsequently, the consensus analysis is conducted. If the consensus of an IVIMLPR is insufficient, a mathematical model is established to enhance the consensus level. Finally, the applications of the proposed GDM approach are offered and the comparative analysis is discussed. Compared with some existing methods, the proposed decision-making algorithm can perform a rational and effective process in the field of artificial intelligence computing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50523,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 110412"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197625004129","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By conducting pairwise comparisons, decision-makers can construct interval-valued intuitionistic multiplicative linguistic preference relations (IVIMLPRs) to express the asymmetrically uncertain preferred and non-preferred qualitative judgments. Based on the consistency and consensus analysis, this paper proposes a new group decision-making (GDM) method with incomplete IVIMLPRs. Firstly, a reasonable and rational concept for IVIMLPR is defined. Inspired by the consistent intuitionistic multiplicative linguistic preference relations (IMLPRs), the consistency of IVIMLPRs is expressed by considering the corresponding lower and upper IMLPRs. After that, the acceptably consistent IVIMLPR is further introduced. Based on these concepts, two optimization models are constructed to estimate the missing linguistic variables and adjust an unacceptably consistent IVIMLPR, respectively. To obtain the priority weights from IVIMLPR in a reliable way, the consistency modeling method is employed. Before calculating the collective IVIMLPR, the weights of decision-makers are determined. Subsequently, the consensus analysis is conducted. If the consensus of an IVIMLPR is insufficient, a mathematical model is established to enhance the consensus level. Finally, the applications of the proposed GDM approach are offered and the comparative analysis is discussed. Compared with some existing methods, the proposed decision-making algorithm can perform a rational and effective process in the field of artificial intelligence computing.
不完全区间值直觉乘性语言偏好关系的群体决策新方法
通过两两比较,决策者可以构建区间值直觉乘法语言偏好关系(ivimlpr)来表达不对称不确定的偏好和非偏好定性判断。在一致性和一致性分析的基础上,提出了一种不完全ivimlpr的群体决策方法。首先,定义了IVIMLPR的合理概念。受一致性直觉乘性语言偏好关系(imlpr)的启发,通过考虑相应的上下imlpr来表达ivimlpr的一致性。之后,进一步介绍了可接受的一致性IVIMLPR。基于这些概念,构建了两个优化模型,分别用于估计缺失的语言变量和调整不可接受的一致性IVIMLPR。为了可靠地从IVIMLPR中获得优先级权重,采用了一致性建模方法。在计算集体IVIMLPR之前,先确定决策者的权重。随后,进行共识分析。如果IVIMLPR的共识不足,则建立数学模型来提高共识水平。最后,给出了GDM方法的应用,并进行了对比分析。与现有的一些方法相比,本文提出的决策算法在人工智能计算领域能够进行合理有效的决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
505
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is pivotal in driving the fourth industrial revolution, witnessing remarkable advancements across various machine learning methodologies. AI techniques have become indispensable tools for practicing engineers, enabling them to tackle previously insurmountable challenges. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence serves as a global platform for the swift dissemination of research elucidating the practical application of AI methods across all engineering disciplines. Submitted papers are expected to present novel aspects of AI utilized in real-world engineering applications, validated using publicly available datasets to ensure the replicability of research outcomes. Join us in exploring the transformative potential of AI in engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信