Study on off-design performance of a hydrogen and electricity joint production system utilizing a very-high-temperature reactor

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Hang Ni , Xinhe Qu , Ping Zhang , Ekaterina Sokolova , Han Zhang , Khashayar Sadeghi , Wei Peng
{"title":"Study on off-design performance of a hydrogen and electricity joint production system utilizing a very-high-temperature reactor","authors":"Hang Ni ,&nbsp;Xinhe Qu ,&nbsp;Ping Zhang ,&nbsp;Ekaterina Sokolova ,&nbsp;Han Zhang ,&nbsp;Khashayar Sadeghi ,&nbsp;Wei Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.113987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study introduces a hydrogen and electricity joint production system that utilizes a very-high-temperature reactor and integrates the iodine–sulfur cycle with the steam Rankine cycle. The system can operate under off-design conditions by adjusting the helium mass flow rates in the main and secondary loops, using constant pressure operation (CPO) or sliding pressure operation (SPO) for the power generation loop. The system’s performance is investigated at partial reactor thermal power. The recommended reactor thermal power load ratios range from 63.90 % to 100 % for CPO and from 64.29 % to 100 % for SPO, with the lower limit determined by the steam generator’s hot-end temperature difference. The hydrogen production rate and the system’s electrical power output both decline with a lower load ratio. Within the recommended load ratios, the hydrogen production rates for CPO and SPO range from 129.44 mol/s to 200 mol/s. With a lower load ratio, the power generation efficiency declines, while the hydrogen-electricity efficiency and system’s exergy efficiency first rise and then fall. At a fixed load ratio, the power generation efficiency, hydrogen-electricity efficiency, and system’s exergy efficiency are higher using SPO than those using CPO, indicating better off-design performance using SPO.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19170,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","volume":"436 ","pages":"Article 113987"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549325001645","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study introduces a hydrogen and electricity joint production system that utilizes a very-high-temperature reactor and integrates the iodine–sulfur cycle with the steam Rankine cycle. The system can operate under off-design conditions by adjusting the helium mass flow rates in the main and secondary loops, using constant pressure operation (CPO) or sliding pressure operation (SPO) for the power generation loop. The system’s performance is investigated at partial reactor thermal power. The recommended reactor thermal power load ratios range from 63.90 % to 100 % for CPO and from 64.29 % to 100 % for SPO, with the lower limit determined by the steam generator’s hot-end temperature difference. The hydrogen production rate and the system’s electrical power output both decline with a lower load ratio. Within the recommended load ratios, the hydrogen production rates for CPO and SPO range from 129.44 mol/s to 200 mol/s. With a lower load ratio, the power generation efficiency declines, while the hydrogen-electricity efficiency and system’s exergy efficiency first rise and then fall. At a fixed load ratio, the power generation efficiency, hydrogen-electricity efficiency, and system’s exergy efficiency are higher using SPO than those using CPO, indicating better off-design performance using SPO.
利用超高温反应器的氢气和电力联合生产系统的非设计性能研究
本研究介绍了一种氢气和电力联合生产系统,该系统利用一个超高温反应器,将碘硫循环与蒸汽朗肯循环整合在一起。通过调整主回路和副回路中的氦气质量流量,该系统可在非设计条件下运行,发电回路采用恒压运行(CPO)或滑动压力运行(SPO)。在部分反应堆热功率下对系统性能进行了研究。推荐的反应堆热功率负载率范围为 CPO 63.90 % 至 100 %,SPO 64.29 % 至 100 %,下限由蒸汽发生器的热端温差决定。氢气生产率和系统电力输出都会随着负载率的降低而下降。在推荐的负载率范围内,CPO 和 SPO 的制氢率从 129.44 摩尔/秒到 200 摩尔/秒不等。负载率越低,发电效率越低,而氢-电效率和系统放能效率则先升后降。在固定负载率下,使用 SPO 的发电效率、氢电效率和系统放能效率均高于使用 CPO 的发电效率、氢电效率和系统放能效率,这表明使用 SPO 的非设计性能更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Nuclear Engineering and Design 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
377
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Nuclear Engineering and Design covers the wide range of disciplines involved in the engineering, design, safety and construction of nuclear fission reactors. The Editors welcome papers both on applied and innovative aspects and developments in nuclear science and technology. Fundamentals of Reactor Design include: • Thermal-Hydraulics and Core Physics • Safety Analysis, Risk Assessment (PSA) • Structural and Mechanical Engineering • Materials Science • Fuel Behavior and Design • Structural Plant Design • Engineering of Reactor Components • Experiments Aspects beyond fundamentals of Reactor Design covered: • Accident Mitigation Measures • Reactor Control Systems • Licensing Issues • Safeguard Engineering • Economy of Plants • Reprocessing / Waste Disposal • Applications of Nuclear Energy • Maintenance • Decommissioning Papers on new reactor ideas and developments (Generation IV reactors) such as inherently safe modular HTRs, High Performance LWRs/HWRs and LMFBs/GFR will be considered; Actinide Burners, Accelerator Driven Systems, Energy Amplifiers and other special designs of power and research reactors and their applications are also encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信