Oral Sodium Bicarbonate vs. Use of Higher Dialysate Bicarbonate in Hemodialysis Patients With Metabolic Acidosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hoda M M Abdulaziz, Alaa Sabry, Marwa Saleh, Ghada El-Said
{"title":"Oral Sodium Bicarbonate vs. Use of Higher Dialysate Bicarbonate in Hemodialysis Patients With Metabolic Acidosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Hoda M M Abdulaziz, Alaa Sabry, Marwa Saleh, Ghada El-Said","doi":"10.1111/hdi.13230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The optimal strategy for correcting metabolic acidosis and maintaining acid-base balance in hemodialysis patients remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of oral bicarbonate administration vs. increased dialysate bicarbonate concentration on predialysis serum bicarbonate levels in hemodialysis patients with metabolic acidosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Adult hemodialysis patients with metabolic acidosis (serum bicarbonate < 22 mmol/L) were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three treatment groups for 16 weeks: (1) standard dialysate (32 mM bicarbonate plus 3 mM acetate), (2) increased dialysate bicarbonate (34 mM bicarbonate plus 3 mM acetate), or (3) standard dialysate with daily oral sodium bicarbonate supplementation (0.3-0.5 mmol/kg). Of the 75 eligible participants, 66 completed the study. The primary outcome was the difference in predialysis serum bicarbonate levels between the groups at 16 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline predialysis serum bicarbonate levels averaged approximately 19.5 mmol/L across all three groups. At 16 weeks, there was no statistically significant difference in predialysis serum bicarbonate levels among the groups (p = 0.701). The mean levels were 20.1 (SD 2.16) mmol/L in the standard dialysate group, 20.5 (SD 2.04) mmol/L in the increased dialysate bicarbonate group, and 20.8 (SD 2.61) mmol/L in the oral supplementation group. Compared to baseline, predialysis bicarbonate levels significantly increased within the increased dialysate bicarbonate group (p = 0.010) and the oral supplementation group (p = 0.021), but not in the control (standard dialysate, no oral supplementation) group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oral or dialytic bicarbonate supplementation at the doses used in this study demonstrated equivalent effects on predialysis serum bicarbonate concentrations in acidotic hemodialysis patients. However, the amount of supplemental bicarbonate administered via either route was insufficient to achieve the target correction of acidosis (e.g., predialysis serum bicarbonate ≥ 22 mmol/L).</p>","PeriodicalId":94027,"journal":{"name":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.13230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The optimal strategy for correcting metabolic acidosis and maintaining acid-base balance in hemodialysis patients remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of oral bicarbonate administration vs. increased dialysate bicarbonate concentration on predialysis serum bicarbonate levels in hemodialysis patients with metabolic acidosis.

Methods: This was a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Adult hemodialysis patients with metabolic acidosis (serum bicarbonate < 22 mmol/L) were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three treatment groups for 16 weeks: (1) standard dialysate (32 mM bicarbonate plus 3 mM acetate), (2) increased dialysate bicarbonate (34 mM bicarbonate plus 3 mM acetate), or (3) standard dialysate with daily oral sodium bicarbonate supplementation (0.3-0.5 mmol/kg). Of the 75 eligible participants, 66 completed the study. The primary outcome was the difference in predialysis serum bicarbonate levels between the groups at 16 weeks.

Results: Baseline predialysis serum bicarbonate levels averaged approximately 19.5 mmol/L across all three groups. At 16 weeks, there was no statistically significant difference in predialysis serum bicarbonate levels among the groups (p = 0.701). The mean levels were 20.1 (SD 2.16) mmol/L in the standard dialysate group, 20.5 (SD 2.04) mmol/L in the increased dialysate bicarbonate group, and 20.8 (SD 2.61) mmol/L in the oral supplementation group. Compared to baseline, predialysis bicarbonate levels significantly increased within the increased dialysate bicarbonate group (p = 0.010) and the oral supplementation group (p = 0.021), but not in the control (standard dialysate, no oral supplementation) group.

Conclusion: Oral or dialytic bicarbonate supplementation at the doses used in this study demonstrated equivalent effects on predialysis serum bicarbonate concentrations in acidotic hemodialysis patients. However, the amount of supplemental bicarbonate administered via either route was insufficient to achieve the target correction of acidosis (e.g., predialysis serum bicarbonate ≥ 22 mmol/L).

口服碳酸氢钠与使用高透析液碳酸氢钠治疗血透患者代谢性酸中毒:一项随机对照试验
导言:血液透析患者纠正代谢性酸中毒和维持酸碱平衡的最佳策略尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估和比较口服碳酸氢盐与增加透析液碳酸氢盐浓度对代谢性酸中毒血液透析患者透析前血清碳酸氢盐水平的影响。方法:这是一项单中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。结果:三组透析前血清碳酸氢盐基线水平平均约为19.5 mmol/L。16周时,两组透析前血清碳酸氢盐水平差异无统计学意义(p = 0.701)。标准透析液组的平均水平为20.1 (SD 2.16) mmol/L,增加碳酸氢盐透析液组的平均水平为20.5 (SD 2.04) mmol/L,口服补充组的平均水平为20.8 (SD 2.61) mmol/L。与基线相比,透析前碳酸氢盐水平在增加碳酸氢盐透析液组(p = 0.010)和口服补充组(p = 0.021)中显著增加,但在对照组(标准透析液,无口服补充)组中没有显著增加。结论:本研究中使用的剂量口服或透析补充碳酸氢盐对酸中毒血液透析患者透析前血清碳酸氢盐浓度有相同的影响。然而,通过任何一种途径补充碳酸氢盐的量都不足以达到酸中毒的目标矫正(例如,透析前血清碳酸氢盐≥22 mmol/L)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信