Glenoid labral articular disruption lesions in the setting of first-time anterior shoulder instability.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jenna L Dvorsky, Ryan T Lin, Confidence Njoku-Austin, Yunseo Linda Park, Sophia McMahon, Zachary J Herman, Rajiv P Reddy, Ehab M Nazzal, Matthew Como, Albert Lin
{"title":"Glenoid labral articular disruption lesions in the setting of first-time anterior shoulder instability.","authors":"Jenna L Dvorsky, Ryan T Lin, Confidence Njoku-Austin, Yunseo Linda Park, Sophia McMahon, Zachary J Herman, Rajiv P Reddy, Ehab M Nazzal, Matthew Como, Albert Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.02.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and rates of recurrent instability of patients following arthroscopic Bankart repair with and without GLAD lesions in the setting of first-time anterior instability events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective comparative case series of consecutive patients with GLAD lesions in the setting of first-time anterior instability events who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair. Patients with GLAD lesions (cases) were matched in a 1:3 ratio for sex, age, BMI, and sport to those without GLAD lesions (controls). Primary outcomes included postoperative ROM (forward elevation and external rotation) and PROs: Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Recurrent instability following primary arthroscopic stabilization was also collected. STATA was used for data analysis. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 56 patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior stabilization between 2012-2020 were included for analysis, of which 14 patients had GLAD lesions while the remaining 42 were controls. Average follow-up time from surgery in controls was 8.2 years (3.1 - 11.7) while the average follow-up in GLAD patients was 7.6 years (3.8 - 11.8). There were no differences in postoperative forward flexion or external rotation, and no difference in SSV, VAS, or WOSI scores. The rate of recurrent instability was found to be the same in both the control and GLAD groups (7% vs. 7% respectively, p=0.16).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with GLAD lesions in the setting of first-time anterior instability had comparable PROs, forward flexion, and external rotation postoperatively to controls. In addition, the presence of a GLAD lesion did not influence the rate of recurrent instability.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV Retrospective Comparative Case Series.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.02.030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and rates of recurrent instability of patients following arthroscopic Bankart repair with and without GLAD lesions in the setting of first-time anterior instability events.

Methods: This was a retrospective comparative case series of consecutive patients with GLAD lesions in the setting of first-time anterior instability events who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair. Patients with GLAD lesions (cases) were matched in a 1:3 ratio for sex, age, BMI, and sport to those without GLAD lesions (controls). Primary outcomes included postoperative ROM (forward elevation and external rotation) and PROs: Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Recurrent instability following primary arthroscopic stabilization was also collected. STATA was used for data analysis. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.

Results: A total of 56 patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior stabilization between 2012-2020 were included for analysis, of which 14 patients had GLAD lesions while the remaining 42 were controls. Average follow-up time from surgery in controls was 8.2 years (3.1 - 11.7) while the average follow-up in GLAD patients was 7.6 years (3.8 - 11.8). There were no differences in postoperative forward flexion or external rotation, and no difference in SSV, VAS, or WOSI scores. The rate of recurrent instability was found to be the same in both the control and GLAD groups (7% vs. 7% respectively, p=0.16).

Conclusion: Patients with GLAD lesions in the setting of first-time anterior instability had comparable PROs, forward flexion, and external rotation postoperatively to controls. In addition, the presence of a GLAD lesion did not influence the rate of recurrent instability.

Level of evidence: Level IV Retrospective Comparative Case Series.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信