Purdue manual dexterity testing: Normative data from young people from Turkey.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Aylin Yalçın Irmak, Aysun Perim Ketenciler
{"title":"Purdue manual dexterity testing: Normative data from young people from Turkey.","authors":"Aylin Yalçın Irmak, Aysun Perim Ketenciler","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2025.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT) is a widely used tool to measure manual dexterity. Since manual dexterity is highly important for participation in education and the workforce, determining its normative values within specific age categories and cultural contexts is of critical importance.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the study was to determine normative values for manual dexterity in young people and to investigate the relationship between these values and certain determinants.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 774 young participants attending selected schools participated in the study using a convenience sampling method. The participants' manual dexterity was assessed using the PPT, including tasks for the right-left hand, both hands, and assembly tasks. Mean scores were analyzed using an independent-sample t-test and one-way Anova test of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was found that participants performed better in manual dexterity when using their dominant hands, female gender, and increasing age. There was no significant difference in PPT test scores based on the number of siblings or the presence of chronic illness (p > 0.05). Regarding regular sports participation, there was a significant difference in mean scores for PPT right and left hand tasks in favor of those who engage in regular sports (p < 0.05), while there was a significantly greater difference between both hands and assembly tasks (p < 0.01). There was a significant difference in mean scores for PPT right hand tasks in favor of those who regularly play musical instruments (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results provide normative data that can be used to assess the manual dexterity of young people. It is believed that systematically examining the manual dexterity of young individuals and evaluating it in the context of the presented normative values will contribute to the early detection of deficiencies and impairments that may negatively affect productivity and the acquisition of vocational skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2025.02.012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT) is a widely used tool to measure manual dexterity. Since manual dexterity is highly important for participation in education and the workforce, determining its normative values within specific age categories and cultural contexts is of critical importance.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to determine normative values for manual dexterity in young people and to investigate the relationship between these values and certain determinants.

Study design: A cross-sectional study.

Methods: A total of 774 young participants attending selected schools participated in the study using a convenience sampling method. The participants' manual dexterity was assessed using the PPT, including tasks for the right-left hand, both hands, and assembly tasks. Mean scores were analyzed using an independent-sample t-test and one-way Anova test of variance.

Results: It was found that participants performed better in manual dexterity when using their dominant hands, female gender, and increasing age. There was no significant difference in PPT test scores based on the number of siblings or the presence of chronic illness (p > 0.05). Regarding regular sports participation, there was a significant difference in mean scores for PPT right and left hand tasks in favor of those who engage in regular sports (p < 0.05), while there was a significantly greater difference between both hands and assembly tasks (p < 0.01). There was a significant difference in mean scores for PPT right hand tasks in favor of those who regularly play musical instruments (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The results provide normative data that can be used to assess the manual dexterity of young people. It is believed that systematically examining the manual dexterity of young individuals and evaluating it in the context of the presented normative values will contribute to the early detection of deficiencies and impairments that may negatively affect productivity and the acquisition of vocational skills.

普渡手动灵活性测试:来自土耳其年轻人的标准数据。
背景:普渡钉板测试(PPT)是一种广泛使用的测量手灵巧度的工具。由于手工灵巧性对于参与教育和劳动力非常重要,因此确定其在特定年龄类别和文化背景下的规范价值至关重要。目的:本研究的目的是确定年轻人手巧的规范性值,并调查这些值与某些决定因素之间的关系。研究设计:横断面研究。方法:采用方便抽样法,选取学校774名青少年参与研究。使用PPT评估参与者的手灵巧性,包括右手任务、双手任务和组装任务。均分分析采用独立样本t检验和单因素方差分析。结果:研究发现,当使用惯用手、女性和年龄增加时,参与者的手灵巧性表现更好。兄弟姐妹数、有无慢性疾病在PPT测试成绩上差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。在经常参加体育运动的情况下,经常参加体育运动的学生在PPT右手任务和左手任务的平均得分上有显著差异(p < 0.05),而双手任务和组装任务的平均得分差异显著(p < 0.01)。经常演奏乐器的学生在PPT右手任务的平均得分上有显著差异(p < 0.05)。结论:本研究结果为青少年手灵巧性评估提供了规范性数据。人们认为,系统地检查年轻人的手工业熟练程度,并在现有的规范价值范围内对其进行评价,将有助于及早发现可能对生产力和获得职业技能产生消极影响的缺陷和缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信