Learning From Evidence: Changes in Real-World Use of Second Androgen Receptor Targeted Treatments in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC).

Dianne Bosch, Kim J M van der Velden, Tom Belleman, Welmoed K van Deen, André M Bergman, Maarten J van der Doelen, Alfons J M van den Eertwegh, Winald R Gerritsen, Reindert J A van Moorselaar, Diederik M Somford, Metin Tascilar, Hans M Westgeest, Carin A Uyl-de Groot, Peter F A Mulders, Malou C P Kuppen, Inge M van Oort
{"title":"Learning From Evidence: Changes in Real-World Use of Second Androgen Receptor Targeted Treatments in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC).","authors":"Dianne Bosch, Kim J M van der Velden, Tom Belleman, Welmoed K van Deen, André M Bergman, Maarten J van der Doelen, Alfons J M van den Eertwegh, Winald R Gerritsen, Reindert J A van Moorselaar, Diederik M Somford, Metin Tascilar, Hans M Westgeest, Carin A Uyl-de Groot, Peter F A Mulders, Malou C P Kuppen, Inge M van Oort","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Androgen receptor targeted therapies (ART) play a major role in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In recent years consensus has been reached that treatment with a second ART should be avoided due to low response rates. The aim of this study was to investigate if new scientific insights led to changes in clinical daily practice in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients included in the Dutch CAPRI-3 prostate cancer registry, currently encompassing 19 hospitals, and treated with at least 1 ART (ie, abiraterone or enzalutamide) were included. Patients were stratified based on start date of first ART (ART1) according to standard of care between 2016-2017, 2018-2019 and 2020-2021. Second ART (ART2) was defined as either direct (ART1>ART2) or at any given time (any ART2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between the first and last ART1 group, the prevalence of ART1>ART2 declined from 14.3% to 6.5% (P = .001) and the prevalence of any ART2 from 27.6% to 10.7% (P < .001). The decline was observed before recommendations were included in European guidelines. The use of other life-prolonging drugs (LPDs) after ART1 (ART1>LPD) increased. Patients who were selected for ART1>ART2 instead of ART1>LPD were older, less frequently treated with taxane-based chemotherapy for mHSPC and had a longer time to development of mCRPC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>New scientific insights were incorporated into clinical daily practice, with a significant decline in in the prevalence of sequential ART treatment, even before recommendations were included in European guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":93941,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":" ","pages":"102317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Androgen receptor targeted therapies (ART) play a major role in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In recent years consensus has been reached that treatment with a second ART should be avoided due to low response rates. The aim of this study was to investigate if new scientific insights led to changes in clinical daily practice in the Netherlands.

Methods: Patients included in the Dutch CAPRI-3 prostate cancer registry, currently encompassing 19 hospitals, and treated with at least 1 ART (ie, abiraterone or enzalutamide) were included. Patients were stratified based on start date of first ART (ART1) according to standard of care between 2016-2017, 2018-2019 and 2020-2021. Second ART (ART2) was defined as either direct (ART1>ART2) or at any given time (any ART2).

Results: Between the first and last ART1 group, the prevalence of ART1>ART2 declined from 14.3% to 6.5% (P = .001) and the prevalence of any ART2 from 27.6% to 10.7% (P < .001). The decline was observed before recommendations were included in European guidelines. The use of other life-prolonging drugs (LPDs) after ART1 (ART1>LPD) increased. Patients who were selected for ART1>ART2 instead of ART1>LPD were older, less frequently treated with taxane-based chemotherapy for mHSPC and had a longer time to development of mCRPC.

Conclusions: New scientific insights were incorporated into clinical daily practice, with a significant decline in in the prevalence of sequential ART treatment, even before recommendations were included in European guidelines.

从证据中学习:第二雄激素受体靶向治疗在转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)中实际使用的变化。
背景:雄激素受体靶向治疗(ART)在转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)的治疗中发挥着重要作用。近年来已达成共识,由于反应率低,应避免使用第二种抗逆转录病毒药物治疗。这项研究的目的是调查新的科学见解是否导致了荷兰临床日常实践的变化。方法:纳入荷兰CAPRI-3前列腺癌登记处的患者,目前包括19家医院,并接受至少1种ART治疗(即阿比特龙或恩杂鲁胺)。根据2016-2017年、2018-2019年和2020-2021年的护理标准,根据首次ART的开始日期(ART1)对患者进行分层。第二次ART (ART2)被定义为直接(ART1 bb0 ART2)或在任何给定时间(任何ART2)。结果:在第一组和最后一组之间,ART1和ART2的患病率从14.3%下降到6.5% (P = 0.001),任何ART2的患病率从27.6%下降到10.7% (P < 0.001)。在这些建议被纳入欧洲指导方针之前,就观察到这种下降。ART1后其他延长生命药物(LPD)的使用(ART1>LPD)增加。选择ART1>ART2而不是ART1>LPD的患者年龄较大,接受基于紫杉醇的mHSPC化疗的频率较低,并且发展为mCRPC的时间较长。结论:新的科学见解被纳入临床日常实践,序贯抗逆转录病毒治疗的流行率显著下降,甚至在建议被纳入欧洲指南之前。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信