Fibromyalgia and Rehabilitation. Not as You Thought. Changing the Stigma.

IF 1.5 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Amit Kosto, Julia Getmansky, Michael Glukhoded, Judith Nosgorodsky, Alan Friedman, Lena Lutsky, Iuly Treger
{"title":"Fibromyalgia and Rehabilitation. Not as You Thought. Changing the Stigma.","authors":"Amit Kosto, Julia Getmansky, Michael Glukhoded, Judith Nosgorodsky, Alan Friedman, Lena Lutsky, Iuly Treger","doi":"10.1002/msc.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A cohort of patients in the rehabilitation wards also suffer from Fibromyalgia, which is considered the most prevalent cause of chronic pain. Poor function, subjective cognitive impairment, instability and imbalance are all common features of Fibromyalgia, among other more prominent features such as the use of chronic pain medication. The main purpose of this study was to examine the differences in Length of Stay (LOS) and functional outcome parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort trial was conducted at the Soroka University Medical Centre. The time of data collection was conducted from January 2015 to December 2021. Patients were divided into two groups based on their exposure status: With Fibromyalgia (n = 43) and Control group Without Fibromyalgia (n = 1119). A 1:10 matching process and regression analysis were performed to avoid confounding factors. Matching was based on age, gender, and ethnicity. Various rehabilitation outcomes were collected along with pain assessment and pain medication use during the hospitalisation. Statistical analysis was performed using R software. A p value of < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant difference was found in the duration of hospitalisation, the FIM index at admission and discharge, or the change in the FIM index (ΔFIM) during hospitalisation between the two groups. No statistically significant differences were demonstrated in stability and balance indices (DGI, BBS) or cognitive assessment tests (MoCA).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The stigma is incorrect, as patients with fibromyalgia can improve their functional parameters during an inpatient rehabilitation programme to the same degree as those without fibromyalgia.</p>","PeriodicalId":46945,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Care","volume":"23 1","pages":"e70080"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A cohort of patients in the rehabilitation wards also suffer from Fibromyalgia, which is considered the most prevalent cause of chronic pain. Poor function, subjective cognitive impairment, instability and imbalance are all common features of Fibromyalgia, among other more prominent features such as the use of chronic pain medication. The main purpose of this study was to examine the differences in Length of Stay (LOS) and functional outcome parameters.

Methods: A retrospective cohort trial was conducted at the Soroka University Medical Centre. The time of data collection was conducted from January 2015 to December 2021. Patients were divided into two groups based on their exposure status: With Fibromyalgia (n = 43) and Control group Without Fibromyalgia (n = 1119). A 1:10 matching process and regression analysis were performed to avoid confounding factors. Matching was based on age, gender, and ethnicity. Various rehabilitation outcomes were collected along with pain assessment and pain medication use during the hospitalisation. Statistical analysis was performed using R software. A p value of < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Results: No statistically significant difference was found in the duration of hospitalisation, the FIM index at admission and discharge, or the change in the FIM index (ΔFIM) during hospitalisation between the two groups. No statistically significant differences were demonstrated in stability and balance indices (DGI, BBS) or cognitive assessment tests (MoCA).

Conclusions: The stigma is incorrect, as patients with fibromyalgia can improve their functional parameters during an inpatient rehabilitation programme to the same degree as those without fibromyalgia.

纤维肌痛和康复。不是你想的那样。改变耻辱。
背景:康复病房的一组患者也患有纤维肌痛,这被认为是慢性疼痛的最普遍原因。功能差、主观认知障碍、不稳定和失衡都是纤维肌痛的共同特征,此外还有使用慢性止痛药等更为突出的特征。本研究的主要目的是检查住院时间(LOS)和功能结局参数的差异。方法:在索罗卡大学医学中心进行回顾性队列试验。数据收集时间为2015年1月至2021年12月。患者根据暴露状态分为两组:有纤维肌痛(n = 43)和无纤维肌痛对照组(n = 1119)。为避免混杂因素,采用1:10匹配处理和回归分析。配对是基于年龄、性别和种族。在住院期间收集各种康复结果以及疼痛评估和止痛药使用情况。采用R软件进行统计分析。结果p值:两组住院时间、入院和出院时FIM指数、住院期间FIM指数(ΔFIM)变化无统计学差异。稳定性和平衡指数(DGI, BBS)或认知评估测试(MoCA)无统计学差异。结论:耻辱感是不正确的,因为纤维肌痛患者在住院康复计划中可以改善他们的功能参数,其程度与没有纤维肌痛的患者相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Care
Musculoskeletal Care RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Care is a peer-reviewed journal for all health professionals committed to the clinical delivery of high quality care for people with musculoskeletal conditions and providing knowledge to support decision making by professionals, patients and policy makers. This journal publishes papers on original research, applied research, review articles and clinical guidelines. Regular topics include patient education, psychological and social impact, patient experiences of health care, clinical up dates and the effectiveness of therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信