Association Between Perceived Control and Acute Coronary Syndrome Symptom Severity: A Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70181
Fatma Refaat Ahmed, Fiona Timmins, Rawia Gamil, Nabeel Al-Yateem, Mary Ryder, Heba Mustafa, Mohannad Eid AbuRuz
{"title":"Association Between Perceived Control and Acute Coronary Syndrome Symptom Severity: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Fatma Refaat Ahmed, Fiona Timmins, Rawia Gamil, Nabeel Al-Yateem, Mary Ryder, Heba Mustafa, Mohannad Eid AbuRuz","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine whether there are differences in patterns of symptom severity in three major ACS symptoms (i.e., chest pain, fatigue, and dyspnoea) over the days of CCU stay between patients with higher and lower levels of perceived control.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective cohort study with 3 days of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hundred and thirty-five patients were followed prospectively for 3 days, collecting data on (1) perceived control, using the Arabic version of the Controlled Attitude Scale (CAS-R); and (2) symptom severity, using a symptoms diary. A mixed repeated measure design ANOVA was used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparative analysis of the high- and low-perceived control groups revealed that there was a significant reduction in chest pain, fatigue, and dyspnoea symptom severity over the course of the 3 days for both groups. Compared to the low-perceived control group, the high-perceived control group had significantly lower chest pain on day 3, fatigue on days 2 and 3, and dyspnoea on all days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with high levels of perceived control have lower levels of symptom severity than those with low perceived control. Interventions to improve perceived control among this population are highly recommended.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No patient or public contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"12 3","pages":"e70181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To determine whether there are differences in patterns of symptom severity in three major ACS symptoms (i.e., chest pain, fatigue, and dyspnoea) over the days of CCU stay between patients with higher and lower levels of perceived control.

Design: A prospective cohort study with 3 days of follow-up.

Methods: Hundred and thirty-five patients were followed prospectively for 3 days, collecting data on (1) perceived control, using the Arabic version of the Controlled Attitude Scale (CAS-R); and (2) symptom severity, using a symptoms diary. A mixed repeated measure design ANOVA was used for data analysis.

Results: Comparative analysis of the high- and low-perceived control groups revealed that there was a significant reduction in chest pain, fatigue, and dyspnoea symptom severity over the course of the 3 days for both groups. Compared to the low-perceived control group, the high-perceived control group had significantly lower chest pain on day 3, fatigue on days 2 and 3, and dyspnoea on all days.

Conclusion: Patients with high levels of perceived control have lower levels of symptom severity than those with low perceived control. Interventions to improve perceived control among this population are highly recommended.

Patient or public contribution: No patient or public contribution.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信