Debora Brascia, Giuseppe Mangiameli, Veronica Maria Giudici, Emanuela Re Cecconi, Matilde Luppichini, Giuseppe Marulli
{"title":"Does the surgical approach affect the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation after thoracic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Debora Brascia, Giuseppe Mangiameli, Veronica Maria Giudici, Emanuela Re Cecconi, Matilde Luppichini, Giuseppe Marulli","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02164-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postoperative atrial fibrillation (PAF) is a common complication after lung resection, since surgical stress may act as a trigger. The VATS approach reduces surgical stress and alleviates inflammation and oxidative stress commonly associated with open lung surgery. However, only a few studies have investigated the possible impact of the surgical approach on the incidence of PAF. A literature review was performed through PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar in March 2024, to identify any study published since 2000 evaluating the role of the VATS vs the open approach to perform lung resections as a risk factor for postoperative atrial fibrillation. Pooled odds ratio (OR) estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Twenty-one studies, including 59,101 patients, met the criteria for inclusion. Both propensity-matched and non-matched data showed that VATS was associated with a significant reduction in PAF compared to open thoracotomy (OT) (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.58-0.91; I2 = 10.1%, p = 0.349). A meta-regression was conducted to explore contributing factors, showing the geographic regions in which the studies were conducted may be a significant source of heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses revealed less heterogeneity in studies conducted in Europe and on those focused solely on lobectomy. Postoperative atrial fibrillation risk following VATS is significantly lower than OT. Further prospective randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02164-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Postoperative atrial fibrillation (PAF) is a common complication after lung resection, since surgical stress may act as a trigger. The VATS approach reduces surgical stress and alleviates inflammation and oxidative stress commonly associated with open lung surgery. However, only a few studies have investigated the possible impact of the surgical approach on the incidence of PAF. A literature review was performed through PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar in March 2024, to identify any study published since 2000 evaluating the role of the VATS vs the open approach to perform lung resections as a risk factor for postoperative atrial fibrillation. Pooled odds ratio (OR) estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Twenty-one studies, including 59,101 patients, met the criteria for inclusion. Both propensity-matched and non-matched data showed that VATS was associated with a significant reduction in PAF compared to open thoracotomy (OT) (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.58-0.91; I2 = 10.1%, p = 0.349). A meta-regression was conducted to explore contributing factors, showing the geographic regions in which the studies were conducted may be a significant source of heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses revealed less heterogeneity in studies conducted in Europe and on those focused solely on lobectomy. Postoperative atrial fibrillation risk following VATS is significantly lower than OT. Further prospective randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings.
期刊介绍:
Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future.
Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts.
Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.