Prostate magnetic resonance imaging to predict grade concordance, extra prostatic extension, and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Mitchell M. Huang M.D. , Goran Rac M.D. , Michael Felice M.D. , Jeffrey L. Ellis M.D. , Nicole Handa M.D. , Eric V. Li M.D. , Mallory McCormick D.O. , Aya Bsatee D.O. , Brandon Piyevsky M.D. , Ashley E. Ross M.D., Ph.D. , Paul M. Yonover M.D. , Gopal N. Gupta M.D. , Hiten D. Patel M.D., M.P.H.
{"title":"Prostate magnetic resonance imaging to predict grade concordance, extra prostatic extension, and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy","authors":"Mitchell M. Huang M.D. ,&nbsp;Goran Rac M.D. ,&nbsp;Michael Felice M.D. ,&nbsp;Jeffrey L. Ellis M.D. ,&nbsp;Nicole Handa M.D. ,&nbsp;Eric V. Li M.D. ,&nbsp;Mallory McCormick D.O. ,&nbsp;Aya Bsatee D.O. ,&nbsp;Brandon Piyevsky M.D. ,&nbsp;Ashley E. Ross M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Paul M. Yonover M.D. ,&nbsp;Gopal N. Gupta M.D. ,&nbsp;Hiten D. Patel M.D., M.P.H.","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.02.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate whether preoperative prostate MRI findings predicted biopsy to radical prostate (RP) grade group concordance, presence of extraprostatic extension (EPE), and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RP.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>We conducted a multi-institutional study (tertiary academic center and community practice) including patients who underwent RP (2014-2021) with preoperative MRI. Grade concordance for systematic, targeted, and combined prostate biopsy was compared to RP. Concordances were also compared for a contemporaneous RP cohort without prebiopsy MRI (No MRI cohort). We assessed association of extracapsular extension on MRI (MRI-ECE) with EPE and BCR after RP.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 768 men, concordance between biopsy and RP was 65.7% for combined, 58.3% for targeted, and 44.7% for systematic biopsy (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). There was no difference in upgrading, concordance, and downgrading compared to 1014 men in the No MRI cohort (<em>P</em> = 0.6). Combined biopsy decreased upgrading to Grade Group ≥3 by 9.2%. EPE after RP was present in 292/768 (38%). MRI-ECE had 56% sensitivity, 74% specificity, 57% positive predictive value, and 73% negative predictive value. MRI-ECE was associated with EPE (OR: 2.25, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and BCR (HR: 1.77<em>, P</em> = 0.006). An MRI-based model improved EPE prediction in the development cohort (AUC 0.80) compared to a traditional nomogram but failed external validation (AUC 0.68).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Preoperative MRI findings predicted grade concordance, presence of EPE, and risk of BCR after RP. Variability in MRI-ECE interpretation limited generalizability of models to predict EPE indicating a need for more standardized reporting to increase clinical utility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":"43 7","pages":"Pages 445.e11-445.e19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078143925000390","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate whether preoperative prostate MRI findings predicted biopsy to radical prostate (RP) grade group concordance, presence of extraprostatic extension (EPE), and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RP.

Material and methods

We conducted a multi-institutional study (tertiary academic center and community practice) including patients who underwent RP (2014-2021) with preoperative MRI. Grade concordance for systematic, targeted, and combined prostate biopsy was compared to RP. Concordances were also compared for a contemporaneous RP cohort without prebiopsy MRI (No MRI cohort). We assessed association of extracapsular extension on MRI (MRI-ECE) with EPE and BCR after RP.

Results

Among 768 men, concordance between biopsy and RP was 65.7% for combined, 58.3% for targeted, and 44.7% for systematic biopsy (P < 0.001). There was no difference in upgrading, concordance, and downgrading compared to 1014 men in the No MRI cohort (P = 0.6). Combined biopsy decreased upgrading to Grade Group ≥3 by 9.2%. EPE after RP was present in 292/768 (38%). MRI-ECE had 56% sensitivity, 74% specificity, 57% positive predictive value, and 73% negative predictive value. MRI-ECE was associated with EPE (OR: 2.25, P < 0.001) and BCR (HR: 1.77, P = 0.006). An MRI-based model improved EPE prediction in the development cohort (AUC 0.80) compared to a traditional nomogram but failed external validation (AUC 0.68).

Conclusions

Preoperative MRI findings predicted grade concordance, presence of EPE, and risk of BCR after RP. Variability in MRI-ECE interpretation limited generalizability of models to predict EPE indicating a need for more standardized reporting to increase clinical utility.
前列腺磁共振成像预测前列腺根治性切除术后的分级一致性、前列腺外展及生化复发。
目的:探讨术前前列腺MRI检查结果是否能预测活检对根治性前列腺(RP)分级组的一致性、前列腺外延伸(EPE)的存在以及RP术后生化复发(BCR)。材料和方法:我们进行了一项多机构研究(三级学术中心和社区实践),包括术前MRI接受RP(2014-2021)的患者。系统、靶向和联合前列腺活检的分级一致性与RP比较。还比较了同期没有活检前MRI的RP队列(无MRI队列)的一致性。我们评估了RP术后囊外伸展与EPE和BCR的相关性。结果:在768名男性中,联合活检与RP的符合率为65.7%,靶向活检为58.3%,系统活检为44.7% (P )结论:术前MRI检查可预测分级一致性,EPE的存在以及RP后BCR的风险。MRI-ECE解释的可变性限制了预测EPE模型的通用性,这表明需要更标准化的报告来提高临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信