Recurrent neural networks and attention scores for personalized prediction and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jinxiang Hu, Mohsen Nayebi Kerdabadi, Xiaohang Mei, Joseph Cappelleri, Richard Barohn, Zijun Yao
{"title":"Recurrent neural networks and attention scores for personalized prediction and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes.","authors":"Jinxiang Hu, Mohsen Nayebi Kerdabadi, Xiaohang Mei, Joseph Cappelleri, Richard Barohn, Zijun Yao","doi":"10.1080/10543406.2025.2469884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We proposed an Interpretable Personalized Artificial Intelligence (AI) model for PRO measures via Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) and attention scores, with data from an open label randomized clinical trial of pain in 402 participants with cryptogenic sensory polyneuropathy at 40 neurology care clinics. All patients were assigned to four treatment groups: nortriptyline, duloxetine, pregabalin, and mexiletine. Each patient had 4 PRO measures (quality of life SF-12; PROMIS: pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance) at 4 time points (baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12). We included 201 patients without missing values. Participants were 30 years or older and 106 (52.7%) were men, majority were White (164, 81.6%). We fitted an RNN model with attention scores to the data to predict the PROMIS pain interference score. We evaluated the model performance with Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and R-square statistics. We also used attention scores to explain the global variable importance at model level, and at individual level for each patient. The best predictor of pain score was the SF-12 item (physical and emotional health interfere with social activities) and fatigue item (push yourself to get things done), the biggest drug-level contributor was mexiletine, the biggest time-level contributor was week 12. Overall, the model fit well (MAE = 3.7, R2 = 63%). Attention-RNN is a feasible and reliable model for predicting PRO outcomes utilizing longitudinal data, such as pain, and can provide personalized individual level interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54870,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2025.2469884","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We proposed an Interpretable Personalized Artificial Intelligence (AI) model for PRO measures via Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) and attention scores, with data from an open label randomized clinical trial of pain in 402 participants with cryptogenic sensory polyneuropathy at 40 neurology care clinics. All patients were assigned to four treatment groups: nortriptyline, duloxetine, pregabalin, and mexiletine. Each patient had 4 PRO measures (quality of life SF-12; PROMIS: pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance) at 4 time points (baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12). We included 201 patients without missing values. Participants were 30 years or older and 106 (52.7%) were men, majority were White (164, 81.6%). We fitted an RNN model with attention scores to the data to predict the PROMIS pain interference score. We evaluated the model performance with Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and R-square statistics. We also used attention scores to explain the global variable importance at model level, and at individual level for each patient. The best predictor of pain score was the SF-12 item (physical and emotional health interfere with social activities) and fatigue item (push yourself to get things done), the biggest drug-level contributor was mexiletine, the biggest time-level contributor was week 12. Overall, the model fit well (MAE = 3.7, R2 = 63%). Attention-RNN is a feasible and reliable model for predicting PRO outcomes utilizing longitudinal data, such as pain, and can provide personalized individual level interpretation.

递归神经网络和注意力评分用于个性化预测和解释患者报告的结果。
我们提出了一个可解释的个性化人工智能(AI)模型,通过循环神经网络(RNN)和注意力评分来测量PRO,数据来自40家神经病学护理诊所的402名隐源性感觉多发性神经病患者的开放标签随机疼痛临床试验。所有患者被分配到四个治疗组:去甲替林、度洛西汀、普瑞巴林和美西汀。每位患者进行4项PRO测量(生活质量SF-12;承诺:疼痛干扰、疲劳、睡眠障碍)在4个时间点(基线、第4周、第8周和第12周)。我们纳入了201例无缺失值的患者。参与者年龄在30岁及以上,男性106人(52.7%),多数为白人(164人,81.6%)。我们对数据拟合了一个带有注意力分数的RNN模型来预测PROMIS疼痛干扰评分。我们用平均绝对误差(MAE)和r平方统计量来评估模型的性能。我们还使用注意力分数来解释模型水平和每个患者个体水平的全局变量重要性。疼痛评分的最佳预测因子是SF-12项目(身心健康对社交活动的干扰)和疲劳项目(强迫自己完成任务),药物水平的最大影响因子是美西汀,时间水平的最大影响因子是第12周。总体而言,模型拟合良好(MAE = 3.7, R2 = 63%)。注意- rnn是利用纵向数据(如疼痛)预测PRO结果的可行且可靠的模型,可以提供个性化的个体水平解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 医学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, a rapid publication journal, discusses quality applications of statistics in biopharmaceutical research and development. Now publishing six times per year, it includes expositions of statistical methodology with immediate applicability to biopharmaceutical research in the form of full-length and short manuscripts, review articles, selected/invited conference papers, short articles, and letters to the editor. Addressing timely and provocative topics important to the biostatistical profession, the journal covers: Drug, device, and biological research and development; Drug screening and drug design; Assessment of pharmacological activity; Pharmaceutical formulation and scale-up; Preclinical safety assessment; Bioavailability, bioequivalence, and pharmacokinetics; Phase, I, II, and III clinical development including complex innovative designs; Premarket approval assessment of clinical safety; Postmarketing surveillance; Big data and artificial intelligence and applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信