Therapeutic Efficacy of Craniocerebral Hypothermia Helmet Versus Arctic Sun Surface Cooling System in Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome: A Prospective Comparative Study.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Aydin Nadir, Mehmet Sari
{"title":"Therapeutic Efficacy of Craniocerebral Hypothermia Helmet Versus Arctic Sun Surface Cooling System in Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome: A Prospective Comparative Study.","authors":"Aydin Nadir, Mehmet Sari","doi":"10.1089/ther.2025.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Therapeutic hypothermia is a critical intervention in post-cardiac arrest care, yet the optimal cooling method remains debatable. This prospective, single-center study compared the efficacy of a novel craniocerebral hypothermia helmet with the Arctic Sun 5000 surface cooling system in post-cardiac arrest patients. Thirty-four comatose survivors of cardiac arrest were randomized to receive either craniocerebral hypothermia (<i>n</i> = 17) or peripheral surface cooling (<i>n</i> = 17). Target temperature management (32-34°C) was initiated within 30-120 minutes of return of spontaneous circulation and maintained for 36-48 hours. Craniocerebral hypothermia demonstrated significantly faster cooling initiation (32.9 ± 13.5 vs. 238 ± 25.7 minutes, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared with peripheral cooling, while both methods achieved similar target temperature maintenance. The craniocerebral group showed better preservation of renal function and electrolyte stability, with significantly lower increases in serum creatinine and urea levels (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Hospital stays were notably shorter in the craniocerebral group (13 ± 7 vs. 24.29 ± 31 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001). While both methods achieved comparable survival rates, the craniocerebral group exhibited a lower incidence of seizures (17.6% vs. 66.6%) and improved neurological outcomes based on Cerebral Performance Category scores though not reaching statistical significance. These findings suggest that craniocerebral hypothermia offers advantages in terms of rapid cooling initiation, physiological stability, and reduced hospital stay, representing a promising alternative for targeted temperature management in post-cardiac arrest care. The enhanced practicality and comparable efficacy of this approach warrant further investigation through larger multicenter trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":22972,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ther.2025.0006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Therapeutic hypothermia is a critical intervention in post-cardiac arrest care, yet the optimal cooling method remains debatable. This prospective, single-center study compared the efficacy of a novel craniocerebral hypothermia helmet with the Arctic Sun 5000 surface cooling system in post-cardiac arrest patients. Thirty-four comatose survivors of cardiac arrest were randomized to receive either craniocerebral hypothermia (n = 17) or peripheral surface cooling (n = 17). Target temperature management (32-34°C) was initiated within 30-120 minutes of return of spontaneous circulation and maintained for 36-48 hours. Craniocerebral hypothermia demonstrated significantly faster cooling initiation (32.9 ± 13.5 vs. 238 ± 25.7 minutes, p < 0.001) compared with peripheral cooling, while both methods achieved similar target temperature maintenance. The craniocerebral group showed better preservation of renal function and electrolyte stability, with significantly lower increases in serum creatinine and urea levels (p < 0.001). Hospital stays were notably shorter in the craniocerebral group (13 ± 7 vs. 24.29 ± 31 days, p < 0.001). While both methods achieved comparable survival rates, the craniocerebral group exhibited a lower incidence of seizures (17.6% vs. 66.6%) and improved neurological outcomes based on Cerebral Performance Category scores though not reaching statistical significance. These findings suggest that craniocerebral hypothermia offers advantages in terms of rapid cooling initiation, physiological stability, and reduced hospital stay, representing a promising alternative for targeted temperature management in post-cardiac arrest care. The enhanced practicality and comparable efficacy of this approach warrant further investigation through larger multicenter trials.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Hypothermia and Temperature Management is the first and only journal to cover all aspects of hypothermia and temperature considerations relevant to this exciting field, including its application in cardiac arrest, spinal cord and traumatic brain injury, stroke, burns, and much more. The Journal provides a strong multidisciplinary forum to ensure that research advances are well disseminated, and that therapeutic hypothermia is well understood and used effectively to enhance patient outcomes. Novel findings from translational preclinical investigations as well as clinical studies and trials are featured in original articles, state-of-the-art review articles, protocols and best practices. Therapeutic Hypothermia and Temperature Management coverage includes: Temperature mechanisms and cooling strategies Protocols, risk factors, and drug interventions Intraoperative considerations Post-resuscitation cooling ICU management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信