Cognitive and social determinants affecting driving after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Christina A DiBlasio, Thomas Novack, Laura E Dreer, Despina Stavrinos, Michael Crowe, Lisa Rapport, Thomas Watanabe, Charles Bombardier, Thomas F Bergquist, Candace Tefertiller, William C Walker, Robert Brunner, Richard Kennedy
{"title":"Cognitive and social determinants affecting driving after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Christina A DiBlasio, Thomas Novack, Laura E Dreer, Despina Stavrinos, Michael Crowe, Lisa Rapport, Thomas Watanabe, Charles Bombardier, Thomas F Bergquist, Candace Tefertiller, William C Walker, Robert Brunner, Richard Kennedy","doi":"10.1037/rep0000609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objective: </strong>Moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) often results in cognitive deficits that hinder the ability to drive an automobile, which in turn hinders independence and quality of life. Determinants affecting the relationship between impaired cognition and return to driving have been understudied. The current study examined the relationship between cognition and driving status following moderate-to-severe TBI.</p><p><strong>Research method/design: </strong>Participants were 585 adults aged 19-96 (70% male) who sustained a moderate-to-severe TBI and were enrolled in the TBI Model System. Cross-sectional data were obtained (2018-2019) 1-30 years post injury (<i>M</i> = 8.2 years). Relationships were examined between driving status (active drivers vs. nondrivers), cognitive function (verbal memory, executive function), and covariates (demographics; injury factors including motor function; social factors).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 70% were driving at interview. Higher memory (<i>OR</i> = 1.36, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and executive function (<i>OR</i> = 1.38, <i>p</i> < .001) scores predicted active driving status; however, the relationships were not significant when the covariates were included. Family income, motor function, and history of seizure were related to driving status (all <i>p</i> < .05). Income and motor function were related to memory and executive function (all <i>p</i> < .001), whereas seizure history was not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/implications: </strong>Memory and executive function are significantly associated with driving status following TBI, but these relationships dissipate after accounting for sociodemographic/injury factors, particularly family income and motor function. Further research is needed to understand the interplay of cognition with other factors in return to driving decisions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000609","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/objective: Moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) often results in cognitive deficits that hinder the ability to drive an automobile, which in turn hinders independence and quality of life. Determinants affecting the relationship between impaired cognition and return to driving have been understudied. The current study examined the relationship between cognition and driving status following moderate-to-severe TBI.

Research method/design: Participants were 585 adults aged 19-96 (70% male) who sustained a moderate-to-severe TBI and were enrolled in the TBI Model System. Cross-sectional data were obtained (2018-2019) 1-30 years post injury (M = 8.2 years). Relationships were examined between driving status (active drivers vs. nondrivers), cognitive function (verbal memory, executive function), and covariates (demographics; injury factors including motor function; social factors).

Results: About 70% were driving at interview. Higher memory (OR = 1.36, p < 0.05) and executive function (OR = 1.38, p < .001) scores predicted active driving status; however, the relationships were not significant when the covariates were included. Family income, motor function, and history of seizure were related to driving status (all p < .05). Income and motor function were related to memory and executive function (all p < .001), whereas seizure history was not.

Conclusion/implications: Memory and executive function are significantly associated with driving status following TBI, but these relationships dissipate after accounting for sociodemographic/injury factors, particularly family income and motor function. Further research is needed to understand the interplay of cognition with other factors in return to driving decisions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

中重度脑外伤后影响驾驶的认知和社会决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Psychology is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles in furtherance of the mission of Division 22 (Rehabilitation Psychology) of the American Psychological Association and to advance the science and practice of rehabilitation psychology. Rehabilitation psychologists consider the entire network of biological, psychological, social, environmental, and political factors that affect the functioning of persons with disabilities or chronic illness. Given the breadth of rehabilitation psychology, the journal"s scope is broadly defined.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信