Independent Review Organization and Proton Therapy: Multistate Analysis and Legal Procedural Strategies.

IF 2.1 Q3 ONCOLOGY
International Journal of Particle Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-17 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijpt.2025.100741
Eric D Brooks, Terence T Sio, Matthew S Ning, Christopher G Morris, Nancy P Mendenhall, Montreal Turner, Noreen K Vergara, Matthew Palmer, Mark E Artz
{"title":"Independent Review Organization and Proton Therapy: Multistate Analysis and Legal Procedural Strategies.","authors":"Eric D Brooks, Terence T Sio, Matthew S Ning, Christopher G Morris, Nancy P Mendenhall, Montreal Turner, Noreen K Vergara, Matthew Palmer, Mark E Artz","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpt.2025.100741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Securing insurance authorization for proton therapy remains a challenge for many centers. When health insurance or employer-sponsored health plans deny coverage, Independent Review Organizations (IROs) can review proton therapy cases. However, despite providing an independent review pathway, IROs are often underutilized in securing approvals for care following a denial.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We analyzed trends in IRO approvals, strategies, and legal procedures using publicly available data from California (CA), Washington (WA), and New York (NY).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The aggregate analysis of the 3 states revealed an IRO average approval rate for proton therapy of 42.1%, with varying trends across states. All 3 states showed increases in IRO approval rates over time, averaging annual increases of +5.0%, +2.3%, and +7.2% for CA, WA, and NY, respectively. Sarcoma showed the highest IRO approval rate at 84.6%, followed by GYN cancers at 55.6% and breast cancer at 51.4%. CNS tumors and lymphomas had moderate approval rates at 44.7% and 40.0% respectively. Head and neck cancers had a 33.3% approval rate, while thoracic malignancies were at 36.8%. The lowest IRO approval rate was seen in prostate cancer at 16.5%. Qualitative analysis revealed that referencing guidelines, discussing published studies, citing trial inclusion, and submitting personalized letters were associated with higher IRO approval rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IRO reviews provide a more objective remedy for patients denied care through internal appeals, particularly for plans with historically unfavorable proton policies. Our study demonstrates that IRO appeals provide a valuable pathway to proton therapy access with higher overturn rates improving significantly in recent years. Nearly half of initially denied patients eventually received approval through this process. Proton centers should strategically utilize IRO reviews to increase patient access and improve approval chances.</p>","PeriodicalId":36923,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","volume":"15 ","pages":"100741"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905844/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpt.2025.100741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Securing insurance authorization for proton therapy remains a challenge for many centers. When health insurance or employer-sponsored health plans deny coverage, Independent Review Organizations (IROs) can review proton therapy cases. However, despite providing an independent review pathway, IROs are often underutilized in securing approvals for care following a denial.

Materials and methods: We analyzed trends in IRO approvals, strategies, and legal procedures using publicly available data from California (CA), Washington (WA), and New York (NY).

Results: The aggregate analysis of the 3 states revealed an IRO average approval rate for proton therapy of 42.1%, with varying trends across states. All 3 states showed increases in IRO approval rates over time, averaging annual increases of +5.0%, +2.3%, and +7.2% for CA, WA, and NY, respectively. Sarcoma showed the highest IRO approval rate at 84.6%, followed by GYN cancers at 55.6% and breast cancer at 51.4%. CNS tumors and lymphomas had moderate approval rates at 44.7% and 40.0% respectively. Head and neck cancers had a 33.3% approval rate, while thoracic malignancies were at 36.8%. The lowest IRO approval rate was seen in prostate cancer at 16.5%. Qualitative analysis revealed that referencing guidelines, discussing published studies, citing trial inclusion, and submitting personalized letters were associated with higher IRO approval rates.

Conclusion: IRO reviews provide a more objective remedy for patients denied care through internal appeals, particularly for plans with historically unfavorable proton policies. Our study demonstrates that IRO appeals provide a valuable pathway to proton therapy access with higher overturn rates improving significantly in recent years. Nearly half of initially denied patients eventually received approval through this process. Proton centers should strategically utilize IRO reviews to increase patient access and improve approval chances.

独立审查组织与质子治疗:多状态分析与法律程序策略。
目的:确保质子治疗的保险授权仍然是许多中心面临的挑战。当健康保险或雇主赞助的健康计划拒绝承保时,独立审查组织(IROs)可以审查质子治疗病例。然而,尽管提供了一个独立的审查途径,但在拒绝治疗后获得批准方面,iro往往没有得到充分利用。材料和方法:我们使用来自加利福尼亚(CA)、华盛顿(WA)和纽约(NY)的公开数据分析了IRO批准、策略和法律程序的趋势。结果:3个州的综合分析显示质子治疗的IRO平均批准率为42.1%,各州的趋势不同。随着时间的推移,这三个州的IRO支持率都有所上升,CA、WA和NY的平均年增长率分别为+5.0%、+2.3%和+7.2%。其次是恶性肿瘤(84.6%)、妇科癌症(55.6%)、乳腺癌(51.4%)。中枢神经系统肿瘤和淋巴瘤的批准率中等,分别为44.7%和40.0%。头颈部肿瘤的批准率为33.3%,胸部恶性肿瘤的批准率为36.8%。IRO批准率最低的是前列腺癌,为16.5%。定性分析显示,参考指南、讨论已发表的研究、引用试验纳入和提交个性化信函与较高的IRO批准率相关。结论:IRO审查为因内部申诉而被拒绝治疗的患者提供了更客观的补救措施,特别是对于历史上不利的质子政策的计划。我们的研究表明,IRO上诉为质子治疗提供了一条有价值的途径,近年来推翻率显著提高。近一半最初被拒的患者最终通过这一过程获得了批准。质子中心应该战略性地利用IRO审查来增加患者的可及性并提高批准的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Particle Therapy
International Journal of Particle Therapy Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
23
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信