Deep learning for the prediction of acute kidney injury after coronary angiography and intervention in patients with chronic kidney disease: a model development and validation study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Renal Failure Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1080/0886022X.2025.2474206
Ying Tang, Ting Wu, Xiufen Wang, Xi Wu, Anqun Chen, Guochun Chen, Chengyuan Tang, Liyu He, Yuting Liu, Meiyu Zeng, Xiaoqin Luo, Shaobin Duan
{"title":"Deep learning for the prediction of acute kidney injury after coronary angiography and intervention in patients with chronic kidney disease: a model development and validation study.","authors":"Ying Tang, Ting Wu, Xiufen Wang, Xi Wu, Anqun Chen, Guochun Chen, Chengyuan Tang, Liyu He, Yuting Liu, Meiyu Zeng, Xiaoqin Luo, Shaobin Duan","doi":"10.1080/0886022X.2025.2474206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are considered the primary population at risk for post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI), yet there are few predictive tools specifically designed for this vulnerable population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult CKD patients undergoing coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention at the Second Xiangya Hospital (2015-2021) were enrolled. The patients were divided into a derivation cohort and a validation cohort based on their admission dates. The primary outcome was the development of PC-AKI. The random forest algorithm was used to identify the most influential predictors of PC-AKI. Six machine learning algorithms were used to construct predictive models for PC-AKI. Model 1 included only preoperative variables, whereas Model 2 included both preoperative and intraoperative variables. The Mehran score was included in the comparison as a classic postoperative predictive model for PC-AKI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 989 CKD patients enrolled, 125 (12.6%) developed PC-AKI. In the validation cohort, deep neural network (DNN) outperformed other machine learning models with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.733 (95% CI 0.654-0.812) for Model 1 and 0.770 (95% CI 0.695-0.845) for Model 2. Furthermore, Model 2 showed better performance compared to the Mehran score (AUROC 0.631, 95% CI 0.538-0.724). The SHapley Additive exPlanations method provided interpretability for the DNN models. A web-based tool was established to help clinicians stratify the risk of PC-AKI (https://xydsbakigroup.streamlit.app/).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The explainable DNN models serve as promising tools for predicting PC-AKI in CKD patients undergoing coronary angiography and intervention, which is crucial for risk stratification and clinical descion-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":20839,"journal":{"name":"Renal Failure","volume":"47 1","pages":"2474206"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renal Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2025.2474206","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are considered the primary population at risk for post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI), yet there are few predictive tools specifically designed for this vulnerable population.

Methods: Adult CKD patients undergoing coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention at the Second Xiangya Hospital (2015-2021) were enrolled. The patients were divided into a derivation cohort and a validation cohort based on their admission dates. The primary outcome was the development of PC-AKI. The random forest algorithm was used to identify the most influential predictors of PC-AKI. Six machine learning algorithms were used to construct predictive models for PC-AKI. Model 1 included only preoperative variables, whereas Model 2 included both preoperative and intraoperative variables. The Mehran score was included in the comparison as a classic postoperative predictive model for PC-AKI.

Results: Among the 989 CKD patients enrolled, 125 (12.6%) developed PC-AKI. In the validation cohort, deep neural network (DNN) outperformed other machine learning models with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.733 (95% CI 0.654-0.812) for Model 1 and 0.770 (95% CI 0.695-0.845) for Model 2. Furthermore, Model 2 showed better performance compared to the Mehran score (AUROC 0.631, 95% CI 0.538-0.724). The SHapley Additive exPlanations method provided interpretability for the DNN models. A web-based tool was established to help clinicians stratify the risk of PC-AKI (https://xydsbakigroup.streamlit.app/).

Conclusion: The explainable DNN models serve as promising tools for predicting PC-AKI in CKD patients undergoing coronary angiography and intervention, which is crucial for risk stratification and clinical descion-making.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renal Failure
Renal Failure 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Renal Failure primarily concentrates on acute renal injury and its consequence, but also addresses advances in the fields of chronic renal failure, hypertension, and renal transplantation. Bringing together both clinical and experimental aspects of renal failure, this publication presents timely, practical information on pathology and pathophysiology of acute renal failure; nephrotoxicity of drugs and other substances; prevention, treatment, and therapy of renal failure; renal failure in association with transplantation, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信