Preexpanded Perforator Flaps for Neoesophageal Reconstruction after Bipolar Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Exclusion.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Plastic and reconstructive surgery Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000012077
Nicolas Bertheuil, Damien Bergeat, Bernard Meunier, Maximilien Thoma, Yanis Berkane, Benoit Lengelé
{"title":"Preexpanded Perforator Flaps for Neoesophageal Reconstruction after Bipolar Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Exclusion.","authors":"Nicolas Bertheuil, Damien Bergeat, Bernard Meunier, Maximilien Thoma, Yanis Berkane, Benoit Lengelé","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total esophageal reconstruction after failure of conventional techniques is a significant surgical challenge, particularly in fragile patients who have undergone multiple surgical procedures. Traditional options, including gastroplasties, colon transfers, and free jejunal flaps, are associated with high morbidity rates, failure rates, or surgical complexity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors report an innovative 4-step strategy for esophageal reconstruction using a presternal skin tube created with tissue expanders and perforator flap techniques. Six patients with previous definitive esophageal exclusion underwent reconstruction between 2009 and 2023. The procedure involved patients with complex medical history and multiple reconstruction failures, including gastroplasties, coloplasties, or ileocoloplasties, and consisted of chest skin expansion with tissue expanders, tubularization of a perforator flap based on internal mammary vessels, anastomosis of the distal skin tube with a jejunal Y loop, and proximal anastomosis to the native cervical esophagus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The entire reconstructive process was completed over 17.5 ± 7.3 months. All patients achieved restoration of digestive tract continuity. Minor complications, including wound dehiscence and fistulas, were observed in all patients, but resolved without major intervention. Functional outcomes were favorable, with a maximum follow-up of 15 years and patients tolerating liquids, semisolids, and solid foods after 2 to 3 months. Imaging and endoscopy confirmed lumen integrity, absence of strictures, and static skin-like epithelium without ulceration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This staged reconstruction offers a viable and safe alternative for total esophageal replacement in complex, high-risk cases, avoiding additional extensive intrathoracic procedures. The presternal neoesophagus provides acceptable function with manageable complications.</p><p><strong>Clinical question/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic, IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"576e-584e"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Total esophageal reconstruction after failure of conventional techniques is a significant surgical challenge, particularly in fragile patients who have undergone multiple surgical procedures. Traditional options, including gastroplasties, colon transfers, and free jejunal flaps, are associated with high morbidity rates, failure rates, or surgical complexity.

Methods: The authors report an innovative 4-step strategy for esophageal reconstruction using a presternal skin tube created with tissue expanders and perforator flap techniques. Six patients with previous definitive esophageal exclusion underwent reconstruction between 2009 and 2023. The procedure involved patients with complex medical history and multiple reconstruction failures, including gastroplasties, coloplasties, or ileocoloplasties, and consisted of chest skin expansion with tissue expanders, tubularization of a perforator flap based on internal mammary vessels, anastomosis of the distal skin tube with a jejunal Y loop, and proximal anastomosis to the native cervical esophagus.

Results: The entire reconstructive process was completed over 17.5 ± 7.3 months. All patients achieved restoration of digestive tract continuity. Minor complications, including wound dehiscence and fistulas, were observed in all patients, but resolved without major intervention. Functional outcomes were favorable, with a maximum follow-up of 15 years and patients tolerating liquids, semisolids, and solid foods after 2 to 3 months. Imaging and endoscopy confirmed lumen integrity, absence of strictures, and static skin-like epithelium without ulceration.

Conclusions: This staged reconstruction offers a viable and safe alternative for total esophageal replacement in complex, high-risk cases, avoiding additional extensive intrathoracic procedures. The presternal neoesophagus provides acceptable function with manageable complications.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.

预扩张穿支皮瓣用于新食管重建:一种治疗双相上消化道排斥的救助性手术。
背景:常规技术失败后的全食管重建是一个重大的外科挑战,特别是在脆弱的,多次手术的患者中。传统的选择,包括胃成形术、结肠移植和游离空肠皮瓣,具有高发病率、失败率或手术复杂性。材料和方法:我们报告了一种创新的四步食道重建策略,使用组织扩张器和穿支皮瓣技术创建胸骨前皮肤管。2009年至2023年间,有6例患者接受了食管排异手术。该手术涉及具有复杂病史和多次重建失败的患者,包括胃成形术、结肠成形术和/或回肠成形术,包括i)使用组织扩张器进行胸部皮肤扩张;ii)基于乳腺内血管的穿支皮瓣管状化;iii)远端皮肤管与空肠“Y”形袢吻合;iv)本地颈段食管近端吻合。结果:整个重建过程完成17.5±7.3个月。所有患者均恢复了消化道的连续性。所有患者均出现轻微并发症,包括伤口裂开和瘘管,但均在没有重大干预的情况下解决。最长随访15年,功能结果良好,患者在2-3个月后耐受液体、半固体和最终固体食物。影像学和内窥镜检查证实管腔完整,无狭窄,静态皮肤样上皮无溃疡。结论:分阶段重建为复杂、高危患者的全食管置换术提供了可行且安全的替代方案,避免了额外的广泛的胸内手术。胸骨前新食管功能良好,并发症可控。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信