Survival outcomes in isolated severe tricuspid regurgitation according to therapeutic modalities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Gaspard Suc, Jules Mesnier, Audrey Cailliau, Mustafa Habib, Clemence Delhomme, Dimitri Arangalage, Dominique Himbert, Gregory Ducrocq, Eric Brochet, Alec Vahanian, Bernard Iung, Marina Urena-Alcazar
{"title":"Survival outcomes in isolated severe tricuspid regurgitation according to therapeutic modalities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Gaspard Suc, Jules Mesnier, Audrey Cailliau, Mustafa Habib, Clemence Delhomme, Dimitri Arangalage, Dominique Himbert, Gregory Ducrocq, Eric Brochet, Alec Vahanian, Bernard Iung, Marina Urena-Alcazar","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Managing isolated severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) poses significant challenges, with questions recently arising about the efficacy of surgery and percutaneous therapies compared with conservative approaches in improving survival.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess the available evidence on mortality associated with different treatment modalities for isolated severe TR.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>A comprehensive search of medical databases was conducted. Studies reporting mortality of isolated TR at 1-year follow-up, with TR severity classified as moderate-to-severe or worse, were included. Exclusion criteria were TR associated with left-heart disease and combined procedures (treating other valves). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 1 year, with secondary outcomes including in-hospital, 2-year and 5-year mortality. Mortality was compared by meta-analysis and meta-regression using age, sex and left ventricular ejection fraction as confounders.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>25 studies met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 72.0 years among the 5702 patients managed medically, 71.3 years among the 1416 patients treated percutaneously and 59.3 years among the 1990 patients managed surgically. In medically managed patients, 1-year, 2-year and 5-year mortality rates were 14%, 20% and 46%, respectively. Among percutaneously managed patients, there was an in-hospital mortality of 1% and a 1-year mortality rate of 18%, which increased to 22% at 2 years. Surgically managed patients experienced an in-hospital mortality of 8% with 1-year, 2-year and 5-year mortality rates of 15%, 20% and 30%, respectively. No statistical differences in mortality were observed at 1, 2 or 5 years. Those results were confirmed after adjusted meta-regression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings underscore the significant long-term mortality associated with isolated severe TR, regardless of treatment group. Despite potential selection bias, both percutaneous and surgical interventions did not offer lower mortality rates compared with medical management after 2 years. Further research is warranted to improve outcomes in the management of isolated TR.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Managing isolated severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) poses significant challenges, with questions recently arising about the efficacy of surgery and percutaneous therapies compared with conservative approaches in improving survival.

Objective: We aimed to assess the available evidence on mortality associated with different treatment modalities for isolated severe TR.

Evidence review: A comprehensive search of medical databases was conducted. Studies reporting mortality of isolated TR at 1-year follow-up, with TR severity classified as moderate-to-severe or worse, were included. Exclusion criteria were TR associated with left-heart disease and combined procedures (treating other valves). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 1 year, with secondary outcomes including in-hospital, 2-year and 5-year mortality. Mortality was compared by meta-analysis and meta-regression using age, sex and left ventricular ejection fraction as confounders.

Findings: 25 studies met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 72.0 years among the 5702 patients managed medically, 71.3 years among the 1416 patients treated percutaneously and 59.3 years among the 1990 patients managed surgically. In medically managed patients, 1-year, 2-year and 5-year mortality rates were 14%, 20% and 46%, respectively. Among percutaneously managed patients, there was an in-hospital mortality of 1% and a 1-year mortality rate of 18%, which increased to 22% at 2 years. Surgically managed patients experienced an in-hospital mortality of 8% with 1-year, 2-year and 5-year mortality rates of 15%, 20% and 30%, respectively. No statistical differences in mortality were observed at 1, 2 or 5 years. Those results were confirmed after adjusted meta-regression.

Conclusions: These findings underscore the significant long-term mortality associated with isolated severe TR, regardless of treatment group. Despite potential selection bias, both percutaneous and surgical interventions did not offer lower mortality rates compared with medical management after 2 years. Further research is warranted to improve outcomes in the management of isolated TR.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信