Lauren A Moreau, Alexander Charles Ford, Matthew James Brookes, Sandra Graca, Elspeth Guthrie, Suzanne Hartley, Lesley Houghton, Karen Kemp, Nicholas A Kennedy, Yvonne McKenzie, Delia Muir, Pei Loo Ow, Christopher Probert, Emma Pryde, Christopher Taylor, Thomas A Willis, Alexandra Wright-Hughes, Amanda J Farrin
{"title":"Management of diarrhoea in patients with stable ulcerative colitis with low FODMAP diet, amitriptyline, ondansetron or loperamide: the MODULATE RCT.","authors":"Lauren A Moreau, Alexander Charles Ford, Matthew James Brookes, Sandra Graca, Elspeth Guthrie, Suzanne Hartley, Lesley Houghton, Karen Kemp, Nicholas A Kennedy, Yvonne McKenzie, Delia Muir, Pei Loo Ow, Christopher Probert, Emma Pryde, Christopher Taylor, Thomas A Willis, Alexandra Wright-Hughes, Amanda J Farrin","doi":"10.3310/GHFE4871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients with ulcerative colitis report ongoing diarrhoea even when their disease is stable and in remission.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>MODULATE was a pragmatic, multicentre, seamless, adaptive, phase 2/3 open-label, parallel-group, multiarm multistage randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>People aged over 18 years with stable ulcerative colitis who had diarrhoea, recruited from secondary care sites in the United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The control arm consisted of modified first-line dietary advice given to all patients with irritable bowel syndrome; the first interventional arm was amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant, which at low doses slows colonic transit; the second intervention was loperamide, an antidiarrhoeal drug also thought to slow colonic transit; the third was ondansetron, an antiemetic thought to slow colonic transit; and the fourth was a diet low in fermentable oligo-, di-, and mono-saccharides and polyols, which is thought to reduce bloating and gas within the small intestine. All patients randomised to an interventional arm were to receive treatment for 6 months.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: primary outcome measures: </strong>Phase 2: Improvement in diarrhoea measured using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale-irritable bowel syndrome questionnaire at 8 weeks post randomisation: improvement defined as those reporting minor discomfort from diarrhoea or less (scoring ≤ 2 on the diarrhoea subscale).</p><p><strong>Secondary outcome measures: </strong>Phases 2 and 3: Measured at both 8 weeks and 6 months: Improvement in diarrhoea measured using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale-irritable bowel syndrome. Blood for C-reactive protein, stool for faecal calprotectin at 6 months only, reviewing case notes for escalation of medical therapy for ulcerative colitis. Anxiety and depression, via the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MODULATE trial opened in December 2021 and closed in January 2023. Of the eight secondary care sites that completed contracting, only four opened to recruitment during this time, and one person was randomised. Trial timelines coincided with the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, causing substantial delays and, ultimately, its early closure. During this time, the trial underwent two major redesign phases, enabling a fully remote participant pathway incorporating electronic consent, remote data capture, posted blood and stool sample kits for eligibility screening, delivery of the dietary intervention via telephone or video call platform, postage of trial investigational medicinal products directly to participants' homes and all trial follow-up appointments conducted via telephone. The second phase of redesign pushed the trial towards a fully decentralised model. However, this stage was not implemented due to the decision to close the trial early.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The study was unable to recruit the necessary sample size, preventing the trial from progressing. The trial met with several challenges. The Trial Steering Committee's root cause analysis concluded that the pandemic was the leading factor in trial closure, especially regarding our ability to recruit both sites and participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the trial closed early and with insufficient participants to proceed with full statistical analysis, lessons were learnt that could potentially inform future remote trial design and decentralised participant pathways.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>MODULATE was a commissioned call in response to a priority question identified by people living with ulcerative colitis. The question remains important and unanswered; trials to address it are needed. Given the recruitment difficulties we experienced, consideration should be given to conducting these in both primary and secondary care.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number 17/33/03.</p>","PeriodicalId":12898,"journal":{"name":"Health technology assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/GHFE4871","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Many patients with ulcerative colitis report ongoing diarrhoea even when their disease is stable and in remission.
Design: MODULATE was a pragmatic, multicentre, seamless, adaptive, phase 2/3 open-label, parallel-group, multiarm multistage randomised controlled trial.
Setting and participants: People aged over 18 years with stable ulcerative colitis who had diarrhoea, recruited from secondary care sites in the United Kingdom.
Interventions: The control arm consisted of modified first-line dietary advice given to all patients with irritable bowel syndrome; the first interventional arm was amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant, which at low doses slows colonic transit; the second intervention was loperamide, an antidiarrhoeal drug also thought to slow colonic transit; the third was ondansetron, an antiemetic thought to slow colonic transit; and the fourth was a diet low in fermentable oligo-, di-, and mono-saccharides and polyols, which is thought to reduce bloating and gas within the small intestine. All patients randomised to an interventional arm were to receive treatment for 6 months.
Main outcome measures: primary outcome measures: Phase 2: Improvement in diarrhoea measured using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale-irritable bowel syndrome questionnaire at 8 weeks post randomisation: improvement defined as those reporting minor discomfort from diarrhoea or less (scoring ≤ 2 on the diarrhoea subscale).
Secondary outcome measures: Phases 2 and 3: Measured at both 8 weeks and 6 months: Improvement in diarrhoea measured using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale-irritable bowel syndrome. Blood for C-reactive protein, stool for faecal calprotectin at 6 months only, reviewing case notes for escalation of medical therapy for ulcerative colitis. Anxiety and depression, via the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
Results: The MODULATE trial opened in December 2021 and closed in January 2023. Of the eight secondary care sites that completed contracting, only four opened to recruitment during this time, and one person was randomised. Trial timelines coincided with the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, causing substantial delays and, ultimately, its early closure. During this time, the trial underwent two major redesign phases, enabling a fully remote participant pathway incorporating electronic consent, remote data capture, posted blood and stool sample kits for eligibility screening, delivery of the dietary intervention via telephone or video call platform, postage of trial investigational medicinal products directly to participants' homes and all trial follow-up appointments conducted via telephone. The second phase of redesign pushed the trial towards a fully decentralised model. However, this stage was not implemented due to the decision to close the trial early.
Limitations: The study was unable to recruit the necessary sample size, preventing the trial from progressing. The trial met with several challenges. The Trial Steering Committee's root cause analysis concluded that the pandemic was the leading factor in trial closure, especially regarding our ability to recruit both sites and participants.
Conclusions: Although the trial closed early and with insufficient participants to proceed with full statistical analysis, lessons were learnt that could potentially inform future remote trial design and decentralised participant pathways.
Future work: MODULATE was a commissioned call in response to a priority question identified by people living with ulcerative colitis. The question remains important and unanswered; trials to address it are needed. Given the recruitment difficulties we experienced, consideration should be given to conducting these in both primary and secondary care.
Funding: This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number 17/33/03.
期刊介绍:
Health Technology Assessment (HTA) publishes research information on the effectiveness, costs and broader impact of health technologies for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS.