Assessing blood pressure changes and hypertension-related outcomes in patients with migraine treated with erenumab: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Headache Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1111/head.14921
Luana Miyahira Makita, Rafael de Freitas de Kleimmann, Rafael Reis de Oliveira, Henrique Alexsander Ferreira Neves, Angela Maria Sandini Corso, Vinícius Salles Alves, Giovana Schlichta Adriano Kojima, Aishwarya Koppanatham, Pedro André Kowacs, Elcio Juliato Piovesan
{"title":"Assessing blood pressure changes and hypertension-related outcomes in patients with migraine treated with erenumab: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Luana Miyahira Makita, Rafael de Freitas de Kleimmann, Rafael Reis de Oliveira, Henrique Alexsander Ferreira Neves, Angela Maria Sandini Corso, Vinícius Salles Alves, Giovana Schlichta Adriano Kojima, Aishwarya Koppanatham, Pedro André Kowacs, Elcio Juliato Piovesan","doi":"10.1111/head.14921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives/background: </strong>We aimed to systematically review and summarize evidence on the effects of erenumab on systemic blood pressure (BP) in patients with migraine (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews ID: CRD42024571056). US Prescribing Information for erenumab was updated to include the potential risk of hypertension, although randomized trials did not link it previously. The association of this monoclonal antibody with an elevated vascular risk remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane databases were searched up to June 18, 2024 for studies examining the impact of erenumab on BP in patients with migraine. I<sup>2</sup> statistics and prediction intervals (PIs) were applied to assess heterogeneity, and sensitivity and subgroup analyses were used to explore it. Data were collected using mean difference (MD) or proportion of events. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Systolic (MD = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.02 to 2.73, p = 0.370, I<sup>2</sup> = 63%) and diastolic (MD = 1.33, 95% CI = -0.05 to 2.72, p = 0.060, I<sup>2</sup> = 69%) BP measures did not significantly differ between after and before erenumab treatment. This lack of significant difference persisted at 3 and 12 months. The leave-one-out technique did not change heterogeneity. The proportion of participants presenting worsening BP appears to be 22.04% (95% CI = 11.12-38.98, PI = 0.54-93.60), with 56.40% corresponding to nonhypertensive individuals at baseline. The incidence of patients starting antihypertensive medications during the study was 3.96% (95% CI = 1.30-11.42, PI = 0.02-90.04), of which 62.88% corresponded to nonhypertensive patients at baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We did not find an association of erenumab with significant increases in systemic BP. There is a considerable degree of fragility in the current evidence available. The decision to prescribe erenumab, especially for patients with multiple comorbidities and risk factors for hypertension, must be made weighing the risks and benefits. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14921","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives/background: We aimed to systematically review and summarize evidence on the effects of erenumab on systemic blood pressure (BP) in patients with migraine (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews ID: CRD42024571056). US Prescribing Information for erenumab was updated to include the potential risk of hypertension, although randomized trials did not link it previously. The association of this monoclonal antibody with an elevated vascular risk remains uncertain.

Methods: Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane databases were searched up to June 18, 2024 for studies examining the impact of erenumab on BP in patients with migraine. I2 statistics and prediction intervals (PIs) were applied to assess heterogeneity, and sensitivity and subgroup analyses were used to explore it. Data were collected using mean difference (MD) or proportion of events. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.

Results: Systolic (MD = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.02 to 2.73, p = 0.370, I2 = 63%) and diastolic (MD = 1.33, 95% CI = -0.05 to 2.72, p = 0.060, I2 = 69%) BP measures did not significantly differ between after and before erenumab treatment. This lack of significant difference persisted at 3 and 12 months. The leave-one-out technique did not change heterogeneity. The proportion of participants presenting worsening BP appears to be 22.04% (95% CI = 11.12-38.98, PI = 0.54-93.60), with 56.40% corresponding to nonhypertensive individuals at baseline. The incidence of patients starting antihypertensive medications during the study was 3.96% (95% CI = 1.30-11.42, PI = 0.02-90.04), of which 62.88% corresponded to nonhypertensive patients at baseline.

Conclusion: We did not find an association of erenumab with significant increases in systemic BP. There is a considerable degree of fragility in the current evidence available. The decision to prescribe erenumab, especially for patients with multiple comorbidities and risk factors for hypertension, must be made weighing the risks and benefits. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

评估伊列单抗治疗偏头痛患者的血压变化和高血压相关结局:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的/背景:我们旨在系统回顾和总结有关erenumab对偏头痛患者全身血压(BP)影响的证据(国际前瞻性系统评价注册ID: CRD42024571056)。erenumab的美国处方信息已更新,纳入了高血压的潜在风险,尽管之前的随机试验并未将其联系起来。这种单克隆抗体与血管风险升高的关系仍不确定。方法:检索Embase、PubMed和Cochrane数据库,查询erenumab对偏头痛患者血压影响的研究,截止到2024年6月18日。采用I2统计量和预测区间(pi)来评估异质性,并采用敏感性和亚组分析来探讨异质性。使用平均差(MD)或事件比例收集数据。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。结果:收缩压(MD = 0.86, 95%可信区间[CI] = -1.02 ~ 2.73, p = 0.370, I2 = 63%)和舒张压(MD = 1.33, 95% CI = -0.05 ~ 2.72, p = 0.060, I2 = 69%)测量结果在erenumab治疗前后无显著差异。这种差异在3个月和12个月时仍然存在。留一技术没有改变异质性。出现血压恶化的参与者比例为22.04% (95% CI = 11.12-38.98, PI = 0.54-93.60),其中56.40%对应于基线时的非高血压个体。研究期间开始使用抗高血压药物的患者发生率为3.96% (95% CI = 1.30-11.42, PI = 0.02-90.04),其中62.88%对应于基线时的非高血压患者。结论:我们没有发现erenumab与全身血压显著升高有关联。现有证据存在相当程度的脆弱性。处方erenumab的决定,特别是对于患有多种合并症和高血压危险因素的患者,必须权衡风险和收益。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信