Clinical profile and outcomes among patients with cardiac implantable electronic device presenting as isolated pocket infection, pocket-related infective endocarditis, or lead-related infective endocarditis.

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Europace Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1093/europace/euaf053
Wojciech Jacheć, Anna Polewczyk, Dorota Nowosielecka, Andrzej Kutarski
{"title":"Clinical profile and outcomes among patients with cardiac implantable electronic device presenting as isolated pocket infection, pocket-related infective endocarditis, or lead-related infective endocarditis.","authors":"Wojciech Jacheć, Anna Polewczyk, Dorota Nowosielecka, Andrzej Kutarski","doi":"10.1093/europace/euaf053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The clinical spectrum of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections includes isolated pocket infection (IPI), pocket infection complicated by infective endocarditis (PIRIE), and lead-related infective endocarditis (LRIE). The aim of this study was to assess the risk factors, clinical course, and outcomes in patients with CIED infections and to demonstrate differences between PIRIE and LRIE.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The retrospective analysis of data from 3847 patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction for non-infectious (2640; 68.62%) and infectious (1207; 31.38%) indications, including 361 (29.91%) IPI, 472 (39.11%) PIRIE, and 374 (30.99%) LRIE, showed some differences in risk factors, clinical course, and outcomes between the subgroups. Unlike PIRIE, diabetes [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.488; 95% confidence interval (CI; 1.178-1.879), P < 0.001] and lead abrasion [HR = 2.117; 95% CI (1.665-2.691), P < 0.001] increased the risk of LRIE. The risk of pocket infection spread was greater with Staphylococcus aureus infection [HR = 1.596; 95% CI (1.202-2.120), P < 0.001]. Compared with LRIE, patients with PIRIE had lower levels of inflammatory markers and lower prevalence of vegetations. Mortality in PIRIE compared with LRIE patients was lower (53.18 vs. 62.30%; P < 0.001) and comparable to IPI (50.69%; P = 0.162) at long-term [median 1828 (815-3139) days] follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cardiac implantable electronic device infections share common risk factors; however, diabetes and intra-cardiac lead abrasion predispose to LRIE, whereas multiple leads and S. aureus in pocket culture are risk factors for pocket infection spread. Compared with LRIE, the clinical course of PIRIE was milder, and short- and long-term mortalities were lower, but comparable with IPI after >1 year. This may be an argument in favour of categorization into primary LRIE and secondary endocarditis, i.e. PIRIE.</p>","PeriodicalId":11981,"journal":{"name":"Europace","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11982440/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europace","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf053","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The clinical spectrum of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections includes isolated pocket infection (IPI), pocket infection complicated by infective endocarditis (PIRIE), and lead-related infective endocarditis (LRIE). The aim of this study was to assess the risk factors, clinical course, and outcomes in patients with CIED infections and to demonstrate differences between PIRIE and LRIE.

Methods and results: The retrospective analysis of data from 3847 patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction for non-infectious (2640; 68.62%) and infectious (1207; 31.38%) indications, including 361 (29.91%) IPI, 472 (39.11%) PIRIE, and 374 (30.99%) LRIE, showed some differences in risk factors, clinical course, and outcomes between the subgroups. Unlike PIRIE, diabetes [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.488; 95% confidence interval (CI; 1.178-1.879), P < 0.001] and lead abrasion [HR = 2.117; 95% CI (1.665-2.691), P < 0.001] increased the risk of LRIE. The risk of pocket infection spread was greater with Staphylococcus aureus infection [HR = 1.596; 95% CI (1.202-2.120), P < 0.001]. Compared with LRIE, patients with PIRIE had lower levels of inflammatory markers and lower prevalence of vegetations. Mortality in PIRIE compared with LRIE patients was lower (53.18 vs. 62.30%; P < 0.001) and comparable to IPI (50.69%; P = 0.162) at long-term [median 1828 (815-3139) days] follow-up.

Conclusion: Cardiac implantable electronic device infections share common risk factors; however, diabetes and intra-cardiac lead abrasion predispose to LRIE, whereas multiple leads and S. aureus in pocket culture are risk factors for pocket infection spread. Compared with LRIE, the clinical course of PIRIE was milder, and short- and long-term mortalities were lower, but comparable with IPI after >1 year. This may be an argument in favour of categorization into primary LRIE and secondary endocarditis, i.e. PIRIE.

以孤立性口袋感染、口袋相关性感染性心内膜炎或铅相关性感染性心内膜炎为表现的心脏植入式电子装置患者的临床概况和结局
目的:心脏植入式电子装置(CIED)感染的临床谱包括孤立性口袋感染(IPI)、口袋感染合并感染性心内膜炎(PIRIE)和铅相关性感染性心内膜炎(LRIE)。本研究的目的是评估CIED感染患者的危险因素、临床过程和结局,并证明PIRIE和LRIE之间的差异。方法与结果:回顾性分析3847例非感染性(2640例;68.62%)和传染性(1207;361例IPI(29.91%)、472例PIRIE(39.11%)和374例LRIE(30.99%)的适应症在亚组间的危险因素、临床病程和转归均有一定差异。与PIRIE不同,糖尿病[HR=1.488;95%CI(1.178÷1.879), p结论:CIED感染具有共同的危险因素,但糖尿病和心内导联磨损易导致LRIE,而多导联和口袋培养金黄色葡萄球菌是口袋感染传播的危险因素。与LRIE相比,PIRIE的临床病程较轻,短期和长期死亡率较低,但在1年后与IPI相当。这可能是支持将其分为原发性LRIE和继发性心内膜炎(即PIRIE)的一个论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Europace
Europace 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
851
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: EP - Europace - European Journal of Pacing, Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to provide an avenue of communication of top quality European and international original scientific work and reviews in the fields of Arrhythmias, Pacing and Cellular Electrophysiology. The Journal offers the reader a collection of contemporary original peer-reviewed papers, invited papers and editorial comments together with book reviews and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信