Patient perceptions of artificial intelligence in dental imaging diagnostics: a multicenter survey.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Camila Tirapelli, Hugo Gaêta-Araújo, Eliana Dantas da Costa, William C Scarfe, Christiano Oliveira-Santos, Kathleen M Fischer, Brigitte Grosgogeat, Valérie Szonyi, Paulo Melo, Julio Ruiz Marrara, Napat Bolstad, Rubens Spin-Neto, Ruben Pauwels
{"title":"Patient perceptions of artificial intelligence in dental imaging diagnostics: a multicenter survey.","authors":"Camila Tirapelli, Hugo Gaêta-Araújo, Eliana Dantas da Costa, William C Scarfe, Christiano Oliveira-Santos, Kathleen M Fischer, Brigitte Grosgogeat, Valérie Szonyi, Paulo Melo, Julio Ruiz Marrara, Napat Bolstad, Rubens Spin-Neto, Ruben Pauwels","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twaf018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate patients' perceptions of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental imaging diagnostics across six centers worldwide, hereby named according to their respective cities: Ribeirão Preto (Brazil), Aarhus (Denmark), Lyon (France), Tromsø (Norway), Porto (Portugal), Louisville (USA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was administered at each center, focusing on patient attitudes and beliefs regarding AI in dental imaging diagnostics. The survey comprised 16 statements rated on a Likert scale, patient characteristics, and an optional comment section. Inter-center differences were analyzed using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests, and correlation analyses were performed between participant characteristics and their perceptions of AI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,581 responses were collected. Most participants expressed positive perceptions of AI as a complementary diagnostic tool, rather than a replacement for human dentists. Key concerns included the need for human oversight, data privacy, and potential cost increases. Differences were observed between centers, with participants from Ribeirão Preto being more likely to accept AI replacing dentists, whereas those from Aarhus and Tromsø expressed greater skepticism about AI's diagnostic capabilities. Higher levels of education and familiarity with AI were positively associated with more favorable views, provided that human supervision remained a key component.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, patients favor the use of AI in dental imaging as an auxiliary diagnostic tool, with human supervision remaining essential. Cultural and demographic factors significantly influence perceptions.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>The findings highlight the need for tailored communication strategies to address patient concerns and facilitate the integration of AI into dental care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twaf018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate patients' perceptions of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental imaging diagnostics across six centers worldwide, hereby named according to their respective cities: Ribeirão Preto (Brazil), Aarhus (Denmark), Lyon (France), Tromsø (Norway), Porto (Portugal), Louisville (USA).

Methods: A survey was administered at each center, focusing on patient attitudes and beliefs regarding AI in dental imaging diagnostics. The survey comprised 16 statements rated on a Likert scale, patient characteristics, and an optional comment section. Inter-center differences were analyzed using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests, and correlation analyses were performed between participant characteristics and their perceptions of AI.

Results: A total of 2,581 responses were collected. Most participants expressed positive perceptions of AI as a complementary diagnostic tool, rather than a replacement for human dentists. Key concerns included the need for human oversight, data privacy, and potential cost increases. Differences were observed between centers, with participants from Ribeirão Preto being more likely to accept AI replacing dentists, whereas those from Aarhus and Tromsø expressed greater skepticism about AI's diagnostic capabilities. Higher levels of education and familiarity with AI were positively associated with more favorable views, provided that human supervision remained a key component.

Conclusions: Overall, patients favor the use of AI in dental imaging as an auxiliary diagnostic tool, with human supervision remaining essential. Cultural and demographic factors significantly influence perceptions.

Advances in knowledge: The findings highlight the need for tailored communication strategies to address patient concerns and facilitate the integration of AI into dental care.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信