The diagnosis of mucormycosis by PCR in patients at risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2025-02-22 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103115
Lottie Brown, Lena Tschiderer, Alexandre Alanio, Rosemary A Barnes, Sharon C-A Chen, Massimo Cogliati, Mario Cruciani, J Peter Donnelly, Ferry Hagen, Catriona Halliday, Lena Klingspor, Katrien Lagrou, Willem Melchers, Laurence Millon, Florent Morio, Elena Salvador, Giacomo Stroffolini, Markus Ruhnke, Stephanie Toepfer, Karin van Dijk, Andrew M Borman, María José Buitrago, Rebecca Gorton, Jürgen Löffller, Riina Rautemaa-Richardson, Boualem Sendid, Peter Willeit, P Lewis White, Michaela Lackner
{"title":"The diagnosis of mucormycosis by PCR in patients at risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Lottie Brown, Lena Tschiderer, Alexandre Alanio, Rosemary A Barnes, Sharon C-A Chen, Massimo Cogliati, Mario Cruciani, J Peter Donnelly, Ferry Hagen, Catriona Halliday, Lena Klingspor, Katrien Lagrou, Willem Melchers, Laurence Millon, Florent Morio, Elena Salvador, Giacomo Stroffolini, Markus Ruhnke, Stephanie Toepfer, Karin van Dijk, Andrew M Borman, María José Buitrago, Rebecca Gorton, Jürgen Löffller, Riina Rautemaa-Richardson, Boualem Sendid, Peter Willeit, P Lewis White, Michaela Lackner","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the performance of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for diagnosing mucormycosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A standardised search was conducted from conception to December 3rd 2024 using PubMed, Embase, Global Health, and Cochrane library. Original studies that used PCR-based methods on any human specimen to diagnose mucormycosis were analysed for eligibility. Using a bivariate meta-analysis, the diagnostic performance of PCR was examined against the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium 2020 (EORTC-MSGERC) definitions of proven and probable invasive mould disease, which was modified to include all patients at risk of mucormycosis. The study protocol was registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42023478667).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 4855 articles, a total of 30 met inclusion criteria, including 5920 PCR reactions on 5147 non-duplicate specimens from 819 cases of proven/probable mucormycosis and 4266 patients who did not meet the EORTC-MSGERC 2020 criteria. According to specimen type, sensitivity of PCR varied (p < 0.001) whereas specificity was similar (p = 0.662). Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid offered the highest sensitivity of 97.5% (95% CI 83.7-99.7%), specificity of 95.8% (95% CI 89.6-98.4%), positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 23.5, and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.03. Tissue provided sensitivity of 86.4% (95% CI 78.9-91.5%), specificity of 90.6% (95% CI 78.1-96.3%), LR+ of 9.2, and LR- of 0.15. Blood provided reduced sensitivity of 81.6% (95% CI 70.1-89.4%), specificity of 95.5% (95% CI 87.4-98.5%), DOR of 95, LR+ of 18.3, and LR- of 0.19. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens yielded the lowest sensitivity of 73.0% (95% CI 61.0-82.3%), highest specificity of 96.4% (CI 95% 87.5-99.0%), LR+ of 20.2, and LR- of 0.28. The covariates best explaining heterogeneity of the overall analysis were specimen type, study design (cohort <i>versus</i> case-control) and disease prevalence while patient population (COVID-19 <i>versus</i> other) and PCR (conventional <i>versus</i> quantitative) had less impact on heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This meta-analysis confirms the high performance of PCR for diagnosing mucormycosis and supports the instatement of PCR detection of free-DNA in blood, BALF and tissue into future updated definitions and diagnostic guidelines for mucormycosis.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"81 ","pages":"103115"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103115","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the performance of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for diagnosing mucormycosis.

Methods: A standardised search was conducted from conception to December 3rd 2024 using PubMed, Embase, Global Health, and Cochrane library. Original studies that used PCR-based methods on any human specimen to diagnose mucormycosis were analysed for eligibility. Using a bivariate meta-analysis, the diagnostic performance of PCR was examined against the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium 2020 (EORTC-MSGERC) definitions of proven and probable invasive mould disease, which was modified to include all patients at risk of mucormycosis. The study protocol was registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42023478667).

Findings: Of 4855 articles, a total of 30 met inclusion criteria, including 5920 PCR reactions on 5147 non-duplicate specimens from 819 cases of proven/probable mucormycosis and 4266 patients who did not meet the EORTC-MSGERC 2020 criteria. According to specimen type, sensitivity of PCR varied (p < 0.001) whereas specificity was similar (p = 0.662). Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid offered the highest sensitivity of 97.5% (95% CI 83.7-99.7%), specificity of 95.8% (95% CI 89.6-98.4%), positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 23.5, and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.03. Tissue provided sensitivity of 86.4% (95% CI 78.9-91.5%), specificity of 90.6% (95% CI 78.1-96.3%), LR+ of 9.2, and LR- of 0.15. Blood provided reduced sensitivity of 81.6% (95% CI 70.1-89.4%), specificity of 95.5% (95% CI 87.4-98.5%), DOR of 95, LR+ of 18.3, and LR- of 0.19. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens yielded the lowest sensitivity of 73.0% (95% CI 61.0-82.3%), highest specificity of 96.4% (CI 95% 87.5-99.0%), LR+ of 20.2, and LR- of 0.28. The covariates best explaining heterogeneity of the overall analysis were specimen type, study design (cohort versus case-control) and disease prevalence while patient population (COVID-19 versus other) and PCR (conventional versus quantitative) had less impact on heterogeneity.

Interpretation: This meta-analysis confirms the high performance of PCR for diagnosing mucormycosis and supports the instatement of PCR detection of free-DNA in blood, BALF and tissue into future updated definitions and diagnostic guidelines for mucormycosis.

Funding: None.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信