Posttreatment pulse rate reduction and not baseline pulse rate as an indicator of blood pressure response to nebivolol: a subanalysis from the real-world BENEFIT-KOREA study.

IF 2.6 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Clinical Hypertension Pub Date : 2025-03-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5646/ch.2025.31.e8
Jinho Shin, Dong Hoon Cha, Woo-Hyung Bae, In Hyun Jung, Seung-Pyo Hong, Sang-Hyun Kim, Jun-Young Do, Won Min Hwang, Young Youp Koh, Giuseppe Mancia, Athanasios J Manolis, MinYoung Lee
{"title":"Posttreatment pulse rate reduction and not baseline pulse rate as an indicator of blood pressure response to nebivolol: a subanalysis from the real-world BENEFIT-KOREA study.","authors":"Jinho Shin, Dong Hoon Cha, Woo-Hyung Bae, In Hyun Jung, Seung-Pyo Hong, Sang-Hyun Kim, Jun-Young Do, Won Min Hwang, Young Youp Koh, Giuseppe Mancia, Athanasios J Manolis, MinYoung Lee","doi":"10.5646/ch.2025.31.e8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This subanalysis of BENEFIT-KOREA cohort assessed the impact of baseline pulse rate (PR) and posttreatment PR reduction on the blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy of nebivolol in patients with hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>South Korean patients with hypertension were enrolled in the BENEFIT-KOREA study; 3,011 patients received nebivolol as monotherapy/add-on therapy. Time-averaged BP, calculated by sum of the product of BPs at weeks 12 and 24 corrected for number of participants at these timepoints, was evaluated with/without adjustment for baseline BP. Change in BP in baseline PR groups of < 70, 70-79, and ≥ 80 beats/min and posttreatment PR reduction groups of < 1, 1-9, and ≥ 10 beats/min at 24 weeks were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The unadjusted time-averaged systolic BP (SBP) at 24 weeks was not significantly different within baseline PR groups or posttreatment PR reduction groups, but the unadjusted time-averaged diastolic BP (DBP) was significantly different within both baseline PR (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and posttreatment PR reduction groups (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Significant differences were observed in adjusted time-averaged SBP (≥ 10 beats/min group: β, -3.4148; <i>P</i> = 0.006) and time-averaged DBP (≥ 10 beats/min: β, -4.5781; <i>P</i> < 0.001) only within the posttreatment PR reduction groups. The majority of adverse events reported with nebivolol were mild.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The efficacy of nebivolol for BP reduction seems to be indicated not by baseline PR but by posttreatment PR reduction. These findings suggest the presence of other mechanisms in addition to sympathetic inhibition which potentially weaken the relationship between baseline PR and BP reduction.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03847350.</p>","PeriodicalId":10480,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Hypertension","volume":"31 ","pages":"e8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11903211/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5646/ch.2025.31.e8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This subanalysis of BENEFIT-KOREA cohort assessed the impact of baseline pulse rate (PR) and posttreatment PR reduction on the blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy of nebivolol in patients with hypertension.

Methods: South Korean patients with hypertension were enrolled in the BENEFIT-KOREA study; 3,011 patients received nebivolol as monotherapy/add-on therapy. Time-averaged BP, calculated by sum of the product of BPs at weeks 12 and 24 corrected for number of participants at these timepoints, was evaluated with/without adjustment for baseline BP. Change in BP in baseline PR groups of < 70, 70-79, and ≥ 80 beats/min and posttreatment PR reduction groups of < 1, 1-9, and ≥ 10 beats/min at 24 weeks were evaluated.

Results: The unadjusted time-averaged systolic BP (SBP) at 24 weeks was not significantly different within baseline PR groups or posttreatment PR reduction groups, but the unadjusted time-averaged diastolic BP (DBP) was significantly different within both baseline PR (P < 0.001) and posttreatment PR reduction groups (P < 0.001). Significant differences were observed in adjusted time-averaged SBP (≥ 10 beats/min group: β, -3.4148; P = 0.006) and time-averaged DBP (≥ 10 beats/min: β, -4.5781; P < 0.001) only within the posttreatment PR reduction groups. The majority of adverse events reported with nebivolol were mild.

Conclusions: The efficacy of nebivolol for BP reduction seems to be indicated not by baseline PR but by posttreatment PR reduction. These findings suggest the presence of other mechanisms in addition to sympathetic inhibition which potentially weaken the relationship between baseline PR and BP reduction.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03847350.

治疗后脉搏率降低而非基线脉搏率作为奈比洛尔血压反应的指标:来自现实世界BENEFIT-KOREA研究的一项亚分析。
背景:这项BENEFIT-KOREA队列的亚分析评估了基线脉搏率(PR)和治疗后PR降低对奈比洛尔高血压患者降压效果的影响。方法:将韩国高血压患者纳入BENEFIT-KOREA研究;3011例患者接受奈比洛尔单药/附加治疗。时间平均血压,通过第12周和第24周的BP乘积的总和计算,校正了这些时间点的参与者人数,在基线血压调整/不调整的情况下评估。评估24周时基线PR < 70,70 -79和≥80次/分组和治疗后PR降低组< 1,1 -9和≥10次/分的血压变化。结果:基线PR组和治疗后PR降低组24周未调整的时间平均收缩压(SBP)差异无统计学意义,但未调整的时间平均舒张压(DBP)在基线PR组和治疗后PR降低组之间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。调整后的时间平均收缩压(≥10次/分钟组:β, -3.4148;P = 0.006)和时间平均DBP(≥10次/分钟:β, -4.5781;P < 0.001),仅在治疗后PR降低组内。奈比洛尔报告的大多数不良事件是轻微的。结论:奈比洛尔降低血压的效果似乎不是通过基线PR而是通过治疗后的PR降低来表示的。这些发现表明,除了交感神经抑制外,还有其他机制可能削弱基线PR和血压降低之间的关系。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03847350。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Hypertension
Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信