A Controlled Single-Centre Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effect of Prophylactic Surgery in Asymptomatic Degenerative Cervical Cord Compression.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Zdenek Kadanka, Martin Nemec, Richard Chaloupka, Ludek Ryba, Karel Maca, Dusan Matejicka, Tomas Rohan, Milos Kerkovsky, Tomas Horak, Magda Horakova, Eva Vlckova, Josef Bednarik
{"title":"A Controlled Single-Centre Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effect of Prophylactic Surgery in Asymptomatic Degenerative Cervical Cord Compression.","authors":"Zdenek Kadanka, Martin Nemec, Richard Chaloupka, Ludek Ryba, Karel Maca, Dusan Matejicka, Tomas Rohan, Milos Kerkovsky, Tomas Horak, Magda Horakova, Eva Vlckova, Josef Bednarik","doi":"10.1177/21925682251323862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignSingle-centre controlled pilot study.ObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of prophylactic surgery and to review the biases of a therapeutic trial in asymptomatic degenerative cervical cord compression (ADCC) patients.MethodsPatients with ADCC and at least 1 predictor of progression to symptomatic degenerative cervical cord myelopathy (DCM) were offered either prophylactic surgery or standard structured rehabilitation. Recruited patients were clinically followed to detect the development of symptomatic DCM.ResultsForty-one patients treated surgically and 68 patients treated non-surgically completed the minimum 36 months' follow-up; 3 recruited patients were lost from evaluation. The surgical group had a higher Neck Disability Index score and more severe MRI compression. A matched subgroup of 41 non-surgical patients was created to reduce potential bias. During the follow-up period we observed progression to symptomatic DCM in 1 surgical case (2.4%) compared to 9 patients in the non-surgical group (13.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.054) and 7 cases in the matched non-surgical group (17.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.029). We observed non-serious early postoperative complications in 4 patients, which resolved spontaneously or after surgical revision. In 9 patients with progression to DCM, the myelopathy was mild with mJOA scale 15-17. One patient in the non-surgical group and 1 patient in the surgical group who progressed to DCM underwent surgery with a good outcome.ConclusionsProphylactic surgery led to a significant decrease in proportion of ADCC patients with progression to DCM. The results justify the organisation of a large randomized multicentre trial that may demonstrate the benefit of prophylactic surgery in ADCC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251323862"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251323862","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignSingle-centre controlled pilot study.ObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of prophylactic surgery and to review the biases of a therapeutic trial in asymptomatic degenerative cervical cord compression (ADCC) patients.MethodsPatients with ADCC and at least 1 predictor of progression to symptomatic degenerative cervical cord myelopathy (DCM) were offered either prophylactic surgery or standard structured rehabilitation. Recruited patients were clinically followed to detect the development of symptomatic DCM.ResultsForty-one patients treated surgically and 68 patients treated non-surgically completed the minimum 36 months' follow-up; 3 recruited patients were lost from evaluation. The surgical group had a higher Neck Disability Index score and more severe MRI compression. A matched subgroup of 41 non-surgical patients was created to reduce potential bias. During the follow-up period we observed progression to symptomatic DCM in 1 surgical case (2.4%) compared to 9 patients in the non-surgical group (13.2%, P = 0.054) and 7 cases in the matched non-surgical group (17.1%, P = 0.029). We observed non-serious early postoperative complications in 4 patients, which resolved spontaneously or after surgical revision. In 9 patients with progression to DCM, the myelopathy was mild with mJOA scale 15-17. One patient in the non-surgical group and 1 patient in the surgical group who progressed to DCM underwent surgery with a good outcome.ConclusionsProphylactic surgery led to a significant decrease in proportion of ADCC patients with progression to DCM. The results justify the organisation of a large randomized multicentre trial that may demonstrate the benefit of prophylactic surgery in ADCC patients.

研究设计单中心对照试验研究目的评估预防性手术的效果,并审查无症状退行性颈脊髓压迫症(ADCC)患者治疗试验的偏差。方法为患有ADCC且至少有一项预示症状性退行性颈脊髓病(DCM)的患者提供预防性手术或标准结构康复治疗。结果41名接受过手术治疗的患者和68名接受过非手术治疗的患者完成了至少36个月的随访;3名接受过手术治疗的患者失去了评估机会。手术组患者的颈部残疾指数评分更高,磁共振成像压迫更严重。为了减少潜在的偏差,我们建立了一个由 41 名非手术患者组成的匹配子组。在随访期间,我们观察到 1 例手术患者(2.4%)发展为有症状的 DCM,而非手术组有 9 例(13.2%,P = 0.054),匹配的非手术组有 7 例(17.1%,P = 0.029)。我们观察到 4 例患者出现了非严重的术后早期并发症,这些并发症在手术翻修后自然缓解。在 9 名进展为 DCM 的患者中,脊髓病变程度较轻,mJOA 评分为 15-17 分。非手术组和手术组中分别有一名进展为 DCM 的患者接受了手术治疗,结果良好。这些结果证明有必要组织一项大型随机多中心试验,以证明预防性手术对 ADCC 患者的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信