Total bilirubin as a marker for hemolysis and outcome in patients with severe ARDS treated with veno-venous ECMO.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Victoria Bünger, Mario Menk, Oliver Hunsicker, Alexander Krannich, Felix Balzer, Claudia D Spies, Wolfgang M Kuebler, Steffen Weber-Carstens, Jan A Graw
{"title":"Total bilirubin as a marker for hemolysis and outcome in patients with severe ARDS treated with veno-venous ECMO.","authors":"Victoria Bünger, Mario Menk, Oliver Hunsicker, Alexander Krannich, Felix Balzer, Claudia D Spies, Wolfgang M Kuebler, Steffen Weber-Carstens, Jan A Graw","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-02988-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemolysis is a common complication in critically ill patients with sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or therapy with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Heme degradation product bilirubin might accumulate in conditions of significant hemolysis. In patients with ARDS and therapy with veno-venous ECMO (vvECMO), the prognostic potential of elevated initial total bilirubin (tBili) was investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of patients with ARDS and vvECMO-therapy (n = 327) admitted to a tertiary ARDS center. A tBili cut-off value was determined by binary recursive partitioning. Baseline characteristics were compared and relevant variables were included in a multivariate logistic regression model with backward variable selection. Primary endpoint was survival within 28 days analyzed with Kaplan-Meier-curves and cox regression. Secondary endpoints included failure free composites for organ dysfunction, renal replacement therapy (RRT), vasopressor therapy and ECMO within 28 days and were compared using competing risk regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cut-off value of 3.6mg/dl divided the cohort for ICU mortality (tBili ≤ 3.6mg/dl: 46% (n = 273) vs. tBili > 3.6mg/dl: 78% (n = 54), p < 0.001). The group with tBili > 3.6mg/dl showed a higher 28-day mortality (HR 3.03 [95%CI 2.07-4.43], p < 0.001) and significantly lower chances of successful recovery from organ dysfunction (subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) 0.29 [0.13-0.66], p < 0.001), RRT (SHR 0.34 [0.14-0.85], p = 0.02), and ECMO (SHR 0.46 [0.25-0.86], p = 0.015) compared to the group with tBili ≤ 3.6mg/dl. Recovery from vasopressor therapy did not differ between groups (SHR 0.63 [0.32-1.24], p = 0.18).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with ARDS, vvECMO-therapy and tBili > 3.6mg/dl had a higher mortality and lower chances for recovery from organ dysfunction, RRT, and ECMO within 28 days. The tBili-cut-off value may be useful to identify patients at risk for unfavorable outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02988-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hemolysis is a common complication in critically ill patients with sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or therapy with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Heme degradation product bilirubin might accumulate in conditions of significant hemolysis. In patients with ARDS and therapy with veno-venous ECMO (vvECMO), the prognostic potential of elevated initial total bilirubin (tBili) was investigated.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with ARDS and vvECMO-therapy (n = 327) admitted to a tertiary ARDS center. A tBili cut-off value was determined by binary recursive partitioning. Baseline characteristics were compared and relevant variables were included in a multivariate logistic regression model with backward variable selection. Primary endpoint was survival within 28 days analyzed with Kaplan-Meier-curves and cox regression. Secondary endpoints included failure free composites for organ dysfunction, renal replacement therapy (RRT), vasopressor therapy and ECMO within 28 days and were compared using competing risk regression analysis.

Results: A cut-off value of 3.6mg/dl divided the cohort for ICU mortality (tBili ≤ 3.6mg/dl: 46% (n = 273) vs. tBili > 3.6mg/dl: 78% (n = 54), p < 0.001). The group with tBili > 3.6mg/dl showed a higher 28-day mortality (HR 3.03 [95%CI 2.07-4.43], p < 0.001) and significantly lower chances of successful recovery from organ dysfunction (subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) 0.29 [0.13-0.66], p < 0.001), RRT (SHR 0.34 [0.14-0.85], p = 0.02), and ECMO (SHR 0.46 [0.25-0.86], p = 0.015) compared to the group with tBili ≤ 3.6mg/dl. Recovery from vasopressor therapy did not differ between groups (SHR 0.63 [0.32-1.24], p = 0.18).

Conclusion: Patients with ARDS, vvECMO-therapy and tBili > 3.6mg/dl had a higher mortality and lower chances for recovery from organ dysfunction, RRT, and ECMO within 28 days. The tBili-cut-off value may be useful to identify patients at risk for unfavorable outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信