Effects of colloid versus crystalloid priming on early haemodynamics in critically ill patients receiving CRRT: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Renli Mao, Zhifeng Zhou, Yingying Yang, Bo Wang, Ling Zhang
{"title":"Effects of colloid versus crystalloid priming on early haemodynamics in critically ill patients receiving CRRT: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Renli Mao, Zhifeng Zhou, Yingying Yang, Bo Wang, Ling Zhang","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the acknowledged advantage of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in maintaining stable haemodynamics compared with intermittent haemodialysis, hypotension remains a common complication, affecting up to 43% of patients immediately following CRRT. This issue can precipitate serious adverse events and is associated with increased mortality. The significant reduction in blood volume during the withdrawal process for machine processing, combined with the rapid elimination of urea during purification, can cause a precipitous decline in plasma osmotic pressure, both of which may serve as triggers for early hypotension during CRRT. Currently, conventional strategies, such as priming the pipeline with normal saline combined with double connections, have failed to significantly reduce the incidence of early hypotension. To prevent this complication, some researchers have turned to the use of human albumin, plasma and colloid fluids instead of normal saline for pipeline priming. Nevertheless, evidence favouring this approach over traditional crystalloid priming is still lacking. This study aims to investigate whether colloid priming is superior to crystalloid priming in reducing the incidence of early hypotension and all-cause mortality, as well as shortening the duration of hospitalisation in intensive care unit and reducing the dialysis dependence in critically ill patients undergoing CRRT.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>A single-centre, prospective, randomised controlled trial will be conducted at West China Hospital of Sichuan University, China. A total of 216 participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be recruited and divided into either the experimental or control group at a ratio of 1:1 via a central randomisation system. In the experimental group, succinyl gelatin will be used to prime the pipeline prior to the connection with the CRRT machine, whereas the control group will use normal saline. The primary outcome is the incidence of early hypotension during CRRT. The outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded. All the data will be analysed based on randomly assigned groups unless data for the primary outcomes are missing.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>The trial protocol was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University (2023.2084), and the results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ChiCTR2400082835.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 3","pages":"e089777"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089777","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the acknowledged advantage of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in maintaining stable haemodynamics compared with intermittent haemodialysis, hypotension remains a common complication, affecting up to 43% of patients immediately following CRRT. This issue can precipitate serious adverse events and is associated with increased mortality. The significant reduction in blood volume during the withdrawal process for machine processing, combined with the rapid elimination of urea during purification, can cause a precipitous decline in plasma osmotic pressure, both of which may serve as triggers for early hypotension during CRRT. Currently, conventional strategies, such as priming the pipeline with normal saline combined with double connections, have failed to significantly reduce the incidence of early hypotension. To prevent this complication, some researchers have turned to the use of human albumin, plasma and colloid fluids instead of normal saline for pipeline priming. Nevertheless, evidence favouring this approach over traditional crystalloid priming is still lacking. This study aims to investigate whether colloid priming is superior to crystalloid priming in reducing the incidence of early hypotension and all-cause mortality, as well as shortening the duration of hospitalisation in intensive care unit and reducing the dialysis dependence in critically ill patients undergoing CRRT.

Methods and analysis: A single-centre, prospective, randomised controlled trial will be conducted at West China Hospital of Sichuan University, China. A total of 216 participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be recruited and divided into either the experimental or control group at a ratio of 1:1 via a central randomisation system. In the experimental group, succinyl gelatin will be used to prime the pipeline prior to the connection with the CRRT machine, whereas the control group will use normal saline. The primary outcome is the incidence of early hypotension during CRRT. The outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded. All the data will be analysed based on randomly assigned groups unless data for the primary outcomes are missing.

Ethics and dissemination: The trial protocol was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University (2023.2084), and the results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number: ChiCTR2400082835.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信