Facilitators and barriers to the practice of neonatal family integrated care from the perspective of healthcare professionals: a systematic review.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Nadia Leake, Sarah Edney, Nicholas Embleton, Janet Berrington, Judith Rankin
{"title":"Facilitators and barriers to the practice of neonatal family integrated care from the perspective of healthcare professionals: a systematic review.","authors":"Nadia Leake, Sarah Edney, Nicholas Embleton, Janet Berrington, Judith Rankin","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a systematic review of barriers and facilitators to the practice of neonatal Family Integrated Care (FICare) from the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCPs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic search strategy was developed to identify qualitative studies exploring neonatal HCPs' views of any of the principles of FICare. Six literature databases (CINAHL, (Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature) Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched using the terms Healthcare Professionals, Neonatal, Environment, FICare, Education, Well-being, Culture, Partnership and Empowerment. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>11032 titles and abstracts and 85 full-text papers were screened. Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria and reported interviews with 1243 HCPs, predominantly nurses. Three themes were synthesised in relation to barriers and facilitators: (1) 'advocacy and acknowledgement', whereby HCPs are expected to advocate for the emotional and mental health of the whole family, not solely the baby's needs; (2) 'belief and behaviour', whereby the degree to which FICare is practised is dependent on HCPs' belief in its benefits in relation to other activities; (3) 'conditions and consistency', whereby a lack of space, resources, policy and consistent practice of FICare created apathy and contradictory approaches to care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although HCPs see value in FICare, successful implementation is multifactorial and requires the expectation to deliver FICare to be aligned with resourcing at the hospital, team and individual levels. Shifting the practice paradigm to FICare remains challenging for some HCPs. Greater understanding of HCPs' views on barriers, facilitators and how FICare practice impacts individuals is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327770","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a systematic review of barriers and facilitators to the practice of neonatal Family Integrated Care (FICare) from the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCPs).

Design: A systematic search strategy was developed to identify qualitative studies exploring neonatal HCPs' views of any of the principles of FICare. Six literature databases (CINAHL, (Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature) Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched using the terms Healthcare Professionals, Neonatal, Environment, FICare, Education, Well-being, Culture, Partnership and Empowerment. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were thematically analysed.

Results: 11032 titles and abstracts and 85 full-text papers were screened. Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria and reported interviews with 1243 HCPs, predominantly nurses. Three themes were synthesised in relation to barriers and facilitators: (1) 'advocacy and acknowledgement', whereby HCPs are expected to advocate for the emotional and mental health of the whole family, not solely the baby's needs; (2) 'belief and behaviour', whereby the degree to which FICare is practised is dependent on HCPs' belief in its benefits in relation to other activities; (3) 'conditions and consistency', whereby a lack of space, resources, policy and consistent practice of FICare created apathy and contradictory approaches to care.

Conclusion: Although HCPs see value in FICare, successful implementation is multifactorial and requires the expectation to deliver FICare to be aligned with resourcing at the hospital, team and individual levels. Shifting the practice paradigm to FICare remains challenging for some HCPs. Greater understanding of HCPs' views on barriers, facilitators and how FICare practice impacts individuals is required.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信