Comparable Limb Salvage Outcomes on Pop Distal Bypass when Using Plantar Artery as a Distal Target.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Aihab Aboukheir-Aboukheir, Patricia Mulero, Noash Rovira Julia, Omar J, Ricardo Fraticelli, Alexander Torres, Angelica Santiago, Stefan Sarkovich, Jose Ortiz-Fullana, Gabriel Pereira-Torrellas, Rafael Santini-Dominguez, Jorge Martinez-Trabal
{"title":"Comparable Limb Salvage Outcomes on Pop Distal Bypass when Using Plantar Artery as a Distal Target.","authors":"Aihab Aboukheir-Aboukheir, Patricia Mulero, Noash Rovira Julia, Omar J, Ricardo Fraticelli, Alexander Torres, Angelica Santiago, Stefan Sarkovich, Jose Ortiz-Fullana, Gabriel Pereira-Torrellas, Rafael Santini-Dominguez, Jorge Martinez-Trabal","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.02.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective is to describe limb salvage and patency rates of infra-genicular bypasses using plantar artery as a distal target. The secondary objective is to compare outcomes between bypasses to the plantar artery and those to other tibial arteries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients who underwent infra-genicular bypasses using autologous venous conduit from July 2012 to June 2018. Demographic variables, indications for surgery, limb salvage, and bypass patency were recorded, and statistical analysis was performed. Exclusion criteria were inflow vessels above the knee, acute limb ischemia, and use of synthetic conduits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety procedures were performed from the third portion of the popliteal artery (POP) to either the anterior tibial (AT), dorsalis pedis (DP), posterior tibial (PT), peroneal (Per), or plantar artery (plantar). The mean age was 70 years old, with 50 patient's male (56%). Predominant comorbidities were diabetes mellitus (87.8%), hypertension (94.4%), and active smoking (25%). Indications for surgery were gangrene (63%), followed by ulceration (26%) and rest pain (11%). There were forty-one Pop-DP (45.5%), twenty-three Pop-Plantar (25.6%), twenty Pop-PT (22.2%), four Pop-Peroneal (4.4%), and two Pop-AT (2.2%). The median follow-up time was 65 months. The limb salvage at one year for plantar artery bypass was 65% (17 patients) and 82% (58 patients) for all other distal bypasses. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed 1-year patency of 65% for plantar bypass while 82% for all other distal bypasses while 3-year patency rates dropped to 60% and 75%, respectively (P=0.185, Chi-square 1.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The plantar artery as a target vessel for infra-genicular bypass using autologous vein conduit is an effective surgical option with acceptable limb salvage and patency rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.02.020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The primary objective is to describe limb salvage and patency rates of infra-genicular bypasses using plantar artery as a distal target. The secondary objective is to compare outcomes between bypasses to the plantar artery and those to other tibial arteries.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients who underwent infra-genicular bypasses using autologous venous conduit from July 2012 to June 2018. Demographic variables, indications for surgery, limb salvage, and bypass patency were recorded, and statistical analysis was performed. Exclusion criteria were inflow vessels above the knee, acute limb ischemia, and use of synthetic conduits.

Results: Ninety procedures were performed from the third portion of the popliteal artery (POP) to either the anterior tibial (AT), dorsalis pedis (DP), posterior tibial (PT), peroneal (Per), or plantar artery (plantar). The mean age was 70 years old, with 50 patient's male (56%). Predominant comorbidities were diabetes mellitus (87.8%), hypertension (94.4%), and active smoking (25%). Indications for surgery were gangrene (63%), followed by ulceration (26%) and rest pain (11%). There were forty-one Pop-DP (45.5%), twenty-three Pop-Plantar (25.6%), twenty Pop-PT (22.2%), four Pop-Peroneal (4.4%), and two Pop-AT (2.2%). The median follow-up time was 65 months. The limb salvage at one year for plantar artery bypass was 65% (17 patients) and 82% (58 patients) for all other distal bypasses. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed 1-year patency of 65% for plantar bypass while 82% for all other distal bypasses while 3-year patency rates dropped to 60% and 75%, respectively (P=0.185, Chi-square 1.75).

Conclusion: The plantar artery as a target vessel for infra-genicular bypass using autologous vein conduit is an effective surgical option with acceptable limb salvage and patency rates.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信