Use of Intraoperative Manual Drainage for the Detection of Lymphatic Ducts for Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Hideki Tokumoto, Shinsuke Akita, Rikiya Nakamura, Shouko Hayama, Mana Wada, Kentaro Kosaka, Yoshitaka Kubota, Nobuyuki Mitsukawa
{"title":"Use of Intraoperative Manual Drainage for the Detection of Lymphatic Ducts for Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis.","authors":"Hideki Tokumoto, Shinsuke Akita, Rikiya Nakamura, Shouko Hayama, Mana Wada, Kentaro Kosaka, Yoshitaka Kubota, Nobuyuki Mitsukawa","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) is a widely accepted conservative treatment for lymphedema. Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) is a minimally invasive bypass surgery that improves lymphedema. However, identifying the lymphatic duct can be challenging during LVA. Transient dilation of the lymphatic ducts can be accomplished with intraoperative MLD, which can definitively identify and isolate the lymphatic ducts. This study describes the use of this intraoperative MLD procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>LVA procedures that used intraoperative MLD were compared with those that did not. The lymphatic diameter, LVA site, rate of cellulitis episodes, and indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography pattern characteristics between the 2 groups were compared. The surgeon performed MLD distal to the incision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intraoperative MLD drainage (+) and drainage (-) groups consisted of 269 and 189 anastomoses, respectively. The median lymphatic duct diameter in the drainage (+) group was significantly larger (0.6 vs 0.5 mm; P < 0.001). The drainage (+) group had significantly higher linear pattern rates preoperatively (76.2% vs 37.6%; P < 0.001), lower extremity (68.4% vs 51.9%; P < 0.001), distal site (81.8% vs 63.5%; P < 0.001), and postoperative improvement by local ICG lymphography pattern (22.7% vs 14.3%; P = 0.03). The rate of cellulitis episodes was significantly lower in the drainage (+) group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The successful detection rate of the lymphatic duct based on the intraoperative MLD was high on the distal side of the extremity and the lymphatic duct without sclerosis. This method was also effective for early-stage lymphedema.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"447-451"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) is a widely accepted conservative treatment for lymphedema. Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) is a minimally invasive bypass surgery that improves lymphedema. However, identifying the lymphatic duct can be challenging during LVA. Transient dilation of the lymphatic ducts can be accomplished with intraoperative MLD, which can definitively identify and isolate the lymphatic ducts. This study describes the use of this intraoperative MLD procedure.

Methods: LVA procedures that used intraoperative MLD were compared with those that did not. The lymphatic diameter, LVA site, rate of cellulitis episodes, and indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography pattern characteristics between the 2 groups were compared. The surgeon performed MLD distal to the incision.

Results: The intraoperative MLD drainage (+) and drainage (-) groups consisted of 269 and 189 anastomoses, respectively. The median lymphatic duct diameter in the drainage (+) group was significantly larger (0.6 vs 0.5 mm; P < 0.001). The drainage (+) group had significantly higher linear pattern rates preoperatively (76.2% vs 37.6%; P < 0.001), lower extremity (68.4% vs 51.9%; P < 0.001), distal site (81.8% vs 63.5%; P < 0.001), and postoperative improvement by local ICG lymphography pattern (22.7% vs 14.3%; P = 0.03). The rate of cellulitis episodes was significantly lower in the drainage (+) group.

Conclusions: The successful detection rate of the lymphatic duct based on the intraoperative MLD was high on the distal side of the extremity and the lymphatic duct without sclerosis. This method was also effective for early-stage lymphedema.

术中手工引流在淋巴-小静脉吻合术中检测淋巴管的应用。
背景:手工淋巴引流(MLD)是一种被广泛接受的治疗淋巴水肿的保守方法。淋巴管吻合(LVA)是一种微创搭桥手术,可改善淋巴水肿。然而,在LVA中,识别淋巴管可能具有挑战性。术中MLD可以完成淋巴管的短暂扩张,它可以明确地识别和分离淋巴管。本研究描述了术中MLD手术的应用。方法:将术中使用MLD的LVA手术与未使用MLD的LVA手术进行比较。比较两组患者的淋巴直径、LVA部位、蜂窝织炎发作率及吲哚菁绿(ICG)淋巴显像特征。外科医生在切口远端进行了MLD。结果术中MLD引流(+)组和引流(-)组分别为269条和189条吻合口。引流(+)组中位淋巴管直径明显增大(0.6 vs 0.5 mm;P < 0.001)。引流(+)组术前线形率明显高于对照组(76.2% vs 37.6%;P < 0.001),下肢(68.4% vs 51.9%;P < 0.001),远端部位(81.8% vs 63.5%;P < 0.001),局部ICG淋巴显像的术后改善(22.7% vs 14.3%;P = 0.03)。引流(+)组蜂窝织炎发作率明显降低。结论:术中基于MLD的下肢远端淋巴管检出率高,无硬化的淋巴管检出率高。这种方法对早期淋巴水肿也有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信