Perioperative outcomes at three rural Rwandan district hospitals: a 28-day prospective observational cohort study.

Abstract

Introduction: The paucity of data on perioperative outcomes in low- and middle-income countries complicates the design and implementation of targeted interventions to improve the delivery of safe, affordable, accessible and timely surgical and anaesthesia care services. We assessed perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing surgical care at three Rwandan rural hospitals-Butaro District Hospital, Kirehe District Hospital and Rwinkwavu District Hospital-supported by Partners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima-an international non-governmental organisation.

Methods: We conducted a 6-month prospective observational cohort study at the three district hospitals. A validated electronic-based perioperative assessment tool was adapted for our setting to capture demographics and clinical information. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were performed using Stata V.15.1.

Results: A total of 3289 major surgeries were performed from January to September 2020 at the three hospitals. Overall, 3204 surgeries (97.5%) were performed on women; the median age was 27 years (IQR: 23-33), and emergency cases constituted 86.8% of all cases. Cases with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status of 3 or above had higher odds of having surgical or anaesthesia complications compared with cases with ASA status 1 (OR: 11.1, 95% CI: 2.7 to 45.8). Furthermore, emergency cases had 1.8 times higher odds of having a composite outcome (developing complications, surgical site infections or death) compared with elective cases (95% CI: 1.1 to 3.0).

Conclusion: Our findings highlight the need for improving surgical capacity, reinforcing infection prevention and control measures and leveraging electronic data capture for quality improvement to ensure safer surgery and anaesthesia care in rural Rwanda.