Physical activity and supportive care intervention preferences: a cross-sectional study of barriers in advanced cancer.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Megan Agnew, Lisa Cadmus-Bertram, Christian W Schmidt, Kristine Kwekkeboom, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Ronald Gangnon, Shaneda Warren Andersen
{"title":"Physical activity and supportive care intervention preferences: a cross-sectional study of barriers in advanced cancer.","authors":"Megan Agnew, Lisa Cadmus-Bertram, Christian W Schmidt, Kristine Kwekkeboom, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Ronald Gangnon, Shaneda Warren Andersen","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2025-005367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Physical activity may greatly benefit adults living with advanced cancer; however, barriers to physical activity and preferences for supportive care interventions are not well understood. This study investigates barriers to physical activity and differences in intervention preferences by demographic and clinical characteristics among adults with advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data came from a cross-sectional study of 247 adults with advanced cancer who visited the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Centre from January 2021 to January 2023. The Godin-Shepard Leisure Score Index (insufficiently active, moderately active and active) was used to assess physical activity. Physical activity barriers were reported as mean scores (1-5: 'not at all' to 'a great deal'). Differences in intervention preferences were assessed using X<sup>2</sup> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adults living with advanced cancer were insufficiently active (53%), moderately active (21%) or active (26%). Respondents identified several barriers to physical activity spanning tiredness (x̄=3.2), winter weather concerns (x̄=3.2) and lack of motivation (x̄=2.7). Respondents were most interested in a supportive care intervention designed to increase energy (88%) and improve physical health (86%) with physical therapy (73%), walking (72%) and resistance exercises (72%). Differences in preferences emerged by demographic characteristics and to a lesser extent by clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adults with advanced cancer reported several barriers to physical activity. Future interventions should emphasise increasing energy and physical health and include strategies to manage tiredness and winter weather concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-005367","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Physical activity may greatly benefit adults living with advanced cancer; however, barriers to physical activity and preferences for supportive care interventions are not well understood. This study investigates barriers to physical activity and differences in intervention preferences by demographic and clinical characteristics among adults with advanced cancer.

Methods: Data came from a cross-sectional study of 247 adults with advanced cancer who visited the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Centre from January 2021 to January 2023. The Godin-Shepard Leisure Score Index (insufficiently active, moderately active and active) was used to assess physical activity. Physical activity barriers were reported as mean scores (1-5: 'not at all' to 'a great deal'). Differences in intervention preferences were assessed using X2 tests.

Results: Adults living with advanced cancer were insufficiently active (53%), moderately active (21%) or active (26%). Respondents identified several barriers to physical activity spanning tiredness (x̄=3.2), winter weather concerns (x̄=3.2) and lack of motivation (x̄=2.7). Respondents were most interested in a supportive care intervention designed to increase energy (88%) and improve physical health (86%) with physical therapy (73%), walking (72%) and resistance exercises (72%). Differences in preferences emerged by demographic characteristics and to a lesser extent by clinical characteristics.

Conclusions: Adults with advanced cancer reported several barriers to physical activity. Future interventions should emphasise increasing energy and physical health and include strategies to manage tiredness and winter weather concerns.

体育活动和支持性护理干预偏好:晚期癌症障碍的横断面研究。
目的:体育锻炼可能对晚期癌症患者大有裨益;然而,身体活动的障碍和对支持性护理干预的偏好尚不清楚。本研究通过人口统计学和临床特征调查晚期癌症患者的身体活动障碍和干预偏好的差异。方法:数据来自一项横断面研究,研究对象为247名晚期癌症患者,他们于2021年1月至2023年1月期间访问了威斯康星大学卡彭癌症中心。采用Godin-Shepard休闲评分指数(不充分运动、适度运动和积极运动)评估身体活动。身体活动障碍以平均分数报告(1-5分:“一点也不”到“很大”)。采用X2检验评估干预偏好的差异。结果:患有晚期癌症的成年人运动不足(53%),中度运动(21%)或运动(26%)。受访者确定了身体活动的几个障碍,包括疲劳(x′=3.2)、冬季天气问题(x′=3.2)和缺乏动力(x′=2.7)。受访者最感兴趣的是支持性护理干预,旨在通过物理治疗(73%)、步行(72%)和阻力运动(72%)增加能量(88%)和改善身体健康(86%)。偏好的差异是由人口统计学特征引起的,在较小程度上是由临床特征引起的。结论:成年晚期癌症患者报告了身体活动的几个障碍。未来的干预措施应强调增加能量和身体健康,并包括管理疲劳和冬季天气问题的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信