INCEPT: The Intensive Care Platform Trial-Design and protocol.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anders Granholm, Morten Hylander Møller, Benjamin Skov Kaas-Hansen, Aksel Karl Georg Jensen, Marie Warrer Munch, Maj-Brit Nørregaard Kjær, Lars Wiuff Andersen, Olav Lilleholt Schjørring, Bodil Steen Rasmussen, Tine Sylvest Meyhoff, Rikke Faebo Larsen, Hans-Christian Thorsen-Meyer, Marie Oxenbøll Collet, Nick Frørup Meier, Stine Estrup, Ole Mathiesen, Mathias Maagaard, Lone Musaeus Poulsen, Thomas Strøm, Steffen Christensen, Camilla Rahbek Lysholm Bruun, Frederik Keus, Peter Rossing, Asger Granfeldt, Anne Craveiro Brøchner, Theis Skovsgaard Itenov, Maria Cronhjort, Jon Henrik Laake, Johanna Hästbacka, Carmen Andrea Pfortmueller, Martin Siegemund, Martin Ingi Sigurdsson, Lars Peter Kloster Andersen, Davide Placido, Theis Lange, Anders Perner
{"title":"INCEPT: The Intensive Care Platform Trial-Design and protocol.","authors":"Anders Granholm, Morten Hylander Møller, Benjamin Skov Kaas-Hansen, Aksel Karl Georg Jensen, Marie Warrer Munch, Maj-Brit Nørregaard Kjær, Lars Wiuff Andersen, Olav Lilleholt Schjørring, Bodil Steen Rasmussen, Tine Sylvest Meyhoff, Rikke Faebo Larsen, Hans-Christian Thorsen-Meyer, Marie Oxenbøll Collet, Nick Frørup Meier, Stine Estrup, Ole Mathiesen, Mathias Maagaard, Lone Musaeus Poulsen, Thomas Strøm, Steffen Christensen, Camilla Rahbek Lysholm Bruun, Frederik Keus, Peter Rossing, Asger Granfeldt, Anne Craveiro Brøchner, Theis Skovsgaard Itenov, Maria Cronhjort, Jon Henrik Laake, Johanna Hästbacka, Carmen Andrea Pfortmueller, Martin Siegemund, Martin Ingi Sigurdsson, Lars Peter Kloster Andersen, Davide Placido, Theis Lange, Anders Perner","doi":"10.1111/aas.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients receive many interventions, but few are supported by high-certainty evidence. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are essential for trustworthy comparisons of intervention effects, but conventional RCTs are costly, cumbersome, inflexible, and often turn out inconclusive. Adaptive platform trials may mitigate these issues and have higher probabilities of obtaining conclusive results faster and at lower costs per participant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Intensive Care Platform Trial (INCEPT) is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, randomised, embedded, multifactorial, international, adaptive platform trial including adults acutely admitted to ICUs. INCEPT will assess comparable groups of interventions (primarily commonly used interventions with clinical uncertainty and practice variation) nested in domains. Interventions may be either open-label or masked. New domains will continuously be added to the platform. INCEPT assesses multiple core outcomes selected following substantial stakeholder involvement: mortality, days alive without life support/out of hospital/free of delirium, health-related quality of life, cognitive function, and safety outcomes. Each domain will use one of these core outcomes as the primary outcome. INCEPT primarily uses Bayesian statistical methods with neutral, minimally informative or sceptical priors, adjustment for important prognostic baseline variables, and calculation of absolute and relative differences in the intention-to-treat populations. Domains and intervention arms may be stopped for superiority/inferiority, practical equivalence, or futility according to pre-specified adaptation rules evaluated using statistical simulation or at pre-specified maximum sample sizes. Domains may use response-adaptive randomisation, meaning that more participants will be allocated to interventions with higher probabilities of being superior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>INCEPT provides an efficient, pragmatic, and flexible platform for comparing the effects of many interventions used in adult ICU patients. The adaptive design enables the trial to use accumulating data to improve the treatment of future participants. INCEPT will provide high-certainty, conclusive evidence for many interventions, directly inform clinical practice, and thus improve patient-important outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 4","pages":"e70023"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients receive many interventions, but few are supported by high-certainty evidence. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are essential for trustworthy comparisons of intervention effects, but conventional RCTs are costly, cumbersome, inflexible, and often turn out inconclusive. Adaptive platform trials may mitigate these issues and have higher probabilities of obtaining conclusive results faster and at lower costs per participant.

Methods: The Intensive Care Platform Trial (INCEPT) is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, randomised, embedded, multifactorial, international, adaptive platform trial including adults acutely admitted to ICUs. INCEPT will assess comparable groups of interventions (primarily commonly used interventions with clinical uncertainty and practice variation) nested in domains. Interventions may be either open-label or masked. New domains will continuously be added to the platform. INCEPT assesses multiple core outcomes selected following substantial stakeholder involvement: mortality, days alive without life support/out of hospital/free of delirium, health-related quality of life, cognitive function, and safety outcomes. Each domain will use one of these core outcomes as the primary outcome. INCEPT primarily uses Bayesian statistical methods with neutral, minimally informative or sceptical priors, adjustment for important prognostic baseline variables, and calculation of absolute and relative differences in the intention-to-treat populations. Domains and intervention arms may be stopped for superiority/inferiority, practical equivalence, or futility according to pre-specified adaptation rules evaluated using statistical simulation or at pre-specified maximum sample sizes. Domains may use response-adaptive randomisation, meaning that more participants will be allocated to interventions with higher probabilities of being superior.

Conclusions: INCEPT provides an efficient, pragmatic, and flexible platform for comparing the effects of many interventions used in adult ICU patients. The adaptive design enables the trial to use accumulating data to improve the treatment of future participants. INCEPT will provide high-certainty, conclusive evidence for many interventions, directly inform clinical practice, and thus improve patient-important outcomes.

INCEPT:重症监护平台试验设计和方案。
背景:成人重症监护病房(ICU)患者接受许多干预措施,但很少有高确定性证据支持。随机临床试验(RCTs)对于干预效果的可靠比较至关重要,但传统的随机临床试验成本高、繁琐、不灵活,而且往往结果不确定。自适应平台试验可以缓解这些问题,并且更有可能以更低的每位参与者成本更快地获得结论性结果。方法:重症监护平台试验(INCEPT)是一项研究者发起的、实用的、随机的、嵌入的、多因素的、国际性的、适应性的平台试验,包括急性入住icu的成年人。INCEPT将评估嵌套在域内的可比较的干预措施组(主要是临床不确定性和实践变化的常用干预措施)。干预措施可以是公开的,也可以是隐蔽的。新域名将不断添加到平台中。INCEPT评估了大量利益相关者参与后选择的多个核心结果:死亡率、无生命支持/出院/无谵妄的存活天数、健康相关的生活质量、认知功能和安全结果。每个领域将使用这些核心结果之一作为主要结果。INCEPT主要使用贝叶斯统计方法,具有中立的、信息最少的或怀疑的先验,调整重要的预后基线变量,并计算治疗意向人群的绝对和相对差异。根据使用统计模拟或预先规定的最大样本量评估的预先规定的适应规则,领域和干预武器可能会因优势/劣势、实际等效或无效而停止。领域可以使用反应适应随机化,这意味着更多的参与者将被分配到具有更高的优越可能性的干预措施中。结论:INCEPT为比较成人ICU患者使用的多种干预措施的效果提供了一个高效、实用和灵活的平台。自适应设计使试验能够使用累积的数据来改善对未来参与者的治疗。INCEPT将为许多干预措施提供高确定性、确凿的证据,直接为临床实践提供信息,从而改善对患者重要的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信