{"title":"Numerical study on gas–liquid separation of two-phase swirling flow based on the Eulerian-Eulerian approach and RSM turbulence model","authors":"Qian Zhang , Wenzhen Chen , Hu Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The steam-water separation package in U-tube steam generator is designed to minimize water content to ensure turbine safety. However, the design of this key component still relies on experiments and trial-and-error methods due to the lack of comprehensive analytical success. The two-phase flow inside an axial swirler is modeled by the Eulerian-Eulerian multiphase flow approach, in which both gas and liquid phases are considered as continuous and coupled to each other. The choice of an appropriate turbulence model significantly impacts on the accuracy of simulation results. The simulation performance of three advanced swirling turbulence models on the gas–liquid interface downstream of the swirler is analyzed. The void fractions along the axial cylinder sections above the swirl vanes are compared with the corresponding experimental air core diameter data from the literature. It is found that the void fraction calculated with RNG <em>k-ε</em> and Realizable <em>k-ε</em> turbulence models decreases monotonously with the axial height above the swirl vanes, whereas the RSM model shows an initial decrease followed by an increase. The RSM model’s results align well with experimental data, particularly in predicting the turning point of void fraction. Adequate grid coverage in the boundary layer is essential to capture the gas–liquid interface due to the very thin liquid film. To obtain the better prediction of gas–liquid swirl flow, the RSM turbulence model and appropriate boundary grid coverage are recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 111334"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454925001513","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The steam-water separation package in U-tube steam generator is designed to minimize water content to ensure turbine safety. However, the design of this key component still relies on experiments and trial-and-error methods due to the lack of comprehensive analytical success. The two-phase flow inside an axial swirler is modeled by the Eulerian-Eulerian multiphase flow approach, in which both gas and liquid phases are considered as continuous and coupled to each other. The choice of an appropriate turbulence model significantly impacts on the accuracy of simulation results. The simulation performance of three advanced swirling turbulence models on the gas–liquid interface downstream of the swirler is analyzed. The void fractions along the axial cylinder sections above the swirl vanes are compared with the corresponding experimental air core diameter data from the literature. It is found that the void fraction calculated with RNG k-ε and Realizable k-ε turbulence models decreases monotonously with the axial height above the swirl vanes, whereas the RSM model shows an initial decrease followed by an increase. The RSM model’s results align well with experimental data, particularly in predicting the turning point of void fraction. Adequate grid coverage in the boundary layer is essential to capture the gas–liquid interface due to the very thin liquid film. To obtain the better prediction of gas–liquid swirl flow, the RSM turbulence model and appropriate boundary grid coverage are recommended.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.