Best practice guidelines and service provision for supporting women with birth-related trauma: A scoping review of international literature

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Harriet Donegan , Lin Zhao , Suzi Mansu
{"title":"Best practice guidelines and service provision for supporting women with birth-related trauma: A scoping review of international literature","authors":"Harriet Donegan ,&nbsp;Lin Zhao ,&nbsp;Suzi Mansu","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><div>Birth trauma (BT) is a significant public health concern affecting approximately one-third of the 140 million annual births worldwide, yet it lacks a unified approach for effective intervention. This study investigates the global landscape of BT management, focusing on the current best practice guidelines and service provisions for supporting women with birth-related trauma and the practicable actionable gaps that needs to be addressed.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This scoping review followed the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, and systematically searched 13 electronic databases and websites for clinical guidelines, policy documents, care standards, practice recommendations and service provisions related to BT. The search yielded eight guidelines, of which were assessed using the AGREE II appraisal tool. Additionally, eight peer-reviewed articles focusing on current practices and service recommendations were analysed alongside the guidelines using a narrative synthesis approach.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>There are gaps between guideline recommendations and service experiences, barriers and facilitators at the patient, provider, and system levels as well as between research, policy and clinical practice. Of the guidelines included, only three rated high quality (&gt;70 %).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>There was consistency in recommending trauma-informed care, collaborative care between health professionals, patient and practitioner education and debriefing as an intervention. However, there were inconsistencies in the definition of BT and most lacked details on the steps, structure or practical tools that should be used. Seven key themes were identified regarding gaps between proposed guidelines and actual experiences of women after traumatic birth.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is an urgent need for standardised, evidence-based guidelines that are user-friendly and provide practical advice for implementing trauma-informed care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 104364"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026661382500083X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem

Birth trauma (BT) is a significant public health concern affecting approximately one-third of the 140 million annual births worldwide, yet it lacks a unified approach for effective intervention. This study investigates the global landscape of BT management, focusing on the current best practice guidelines and service provisions for supporting women with birth-related trauma and the practicable actionable gaps that needs to be addressed.

Methods

This scoping review followed the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, and systematically searched 13 electronic databases and websites for clinical guidelines, policy documents, care standards, practice recommendations and service provisions related to BT. The search yielded eight guidelines, of which were assessed using the AGREE II appraisal tool. Additionally, eight peer-reviewed articles focusing on current practices and service recommendations were analysed alongside the guidelines using a narrative synthesis approach.

Findings

There are gaps between guideline recommendations and service experiences, barriers and facilitators at the patient, provider, and system levels as well as between research, policy and clinical practice. Of the guidelines included, only three rated high quality (>70 %).

Discussion

There was consistency in recommending trauma-informed care, collaborative care between health professionals, patient and practitioner education and debriefing as an intervention. However, there were inconsistencies in the definition of BT and most lacked details on the steps, structure or practical tools that should be used. Seven key themes were identified regarding gaps between proposed guidelines and actual experiences of women after traumatic birth.

Conclusion

There is an urgent need for standardised, evidence-based guidelines that are user-friendly and provide practical advice for implementing trauma-informed care.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信