Three decades of the practice of decentralised forest management in Africa: A systematic review of current knowledge and prospects

IF 3.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Hamzath Akambi Séivè Kora , Juliano Sènanmi Hermann Houndonougbo , Florent Noulèkoun , Eric Etchikinto Agoyi , Achille Ephrem Assogbadjo , Brice Sinsin
{"title":"Three decades of the practice of decentralised forest management in Africa: A systematic review of current knowledge and prospects","authors":"Hamzath Akambi Séivè Kora ,&nbsp;Juliano Sènanmi Hermann Houndonougbo ,&nbsp;Florent Noulèkoun ,&nbsp;Eric Etchikinto Agoyi ,&nbsp;Achille Ephrem Assogbadjo ,&nbsp;Brice Sinsin","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Decentralised Forest Management (DFM), a forest management approach involving local communities, has been implemented in many countries worldwide to remedy the failure of state-centred forest management to conserve resources. This review shed new insights into the progress of DFM in Africa. Despite the great interest in forest management, many African countries have limited awareness of DFM. Our in-depth bibliometric analysis based on multiple online search engines covered the period 1992–2021 and yielded 1064 articles, of which 245 were selected for this review. Publications recorded on DFM came from 25 countries, covering four of the five African sub-regions. Approximately 77 % of the retained publications came from East Africa alone. Community participation, institutional arrangements, and contribution of DFM to forest conservation and community livelihoods were the main foci of the studies. Apart from the Village Land Forest approach, which devolves full power to local communities in Tanzania, most DFM schemes in Africa are implemented through deconcentration or delegation, whereby the local communities are primarily used as a workforce. This resulted in low interest among local people in forestry activities and limited implementation of DFM following the cessation of the initial DFM projects. Our analysis also highlighted gaps in knowledge about DFM regarding adjacent land use, conflict resolution, and ethnobotnical study. Our findings should guide scholars in their future research, as well as decision-makers in developing sound community-based management strategies for tropical forests in the context of their overexploitation and rapid degradation. We argue that significant efforts are still needed to achieve the ideal implementation of the DFM approach in Africa.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article e03525"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235198942500126X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decentralised Forest Management (DFM), a forest management approach involving local communities, has been implemented in many countries worldwide to remedy the failure of state-centred forest management to conserve resources. This review shed new insights into the progress of DFM in Africa. Despite the great interest in forest management, many African countries have limited awareness of DFM. Our in-depth bibliometric analysis based on multiple online search engines covered the period 1992–2021 and yielded 1064 articles, of which 245 were selected for this review. Publications recorded on DFM came from 25 countries, covering four of the five African sub-regions. Approximately 77 % of the retained publications came from East Africa alone. Community participation, institutional arrangements, and contribution of DFM to forest conservation and community livelihoods were the main foci of the studies. Apart from the Village Land Forest approach, which devolves full power to local communities in Tanzania, most DFM schemes in Africa are implemented through deconcentration or delegation, whereby the local communities are primarily used as a workforce. This resulted in low interest among local people in forestry activities and limited implementation of DFM following the cessation of the initial DFM projects. Our analysis also highlighted gaps in knowledge about DFM regarding adjacent land use, conflict resolution, and ethnobotnical study. Our findings should guide scholars in their future research, as well as decision-makers in developing sound community-based management strategies for tropical forests in the context of their overexploitation and rapid degradation. We argue that significant efforts are still needed to achieve the ideal implementation of the DFM approach in Africa.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信