Community-Engaged Development of Equitable and Scalable Mobile Health Tools for Tobacco Treatment

Joanna L. Hart MD , Tamar Klaiman PhD, MPH , Michael Scott BS , George M. Fernandez , Dorothy Sheu MPH , Aerielle Belk BS , Jasmine A. Silvestri MPH , Jannie Kim MPH , Scott D. Halpern MD, PhD , Nsenga Farrell EdD, MA
{"title":"Community-Engaged Development of Equitable and Scalable Mobile Health Tools for Tobacco Treatment","authors":"Joanna L. Hart MD ,&nbsp;Tamar Klaiman PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Michael Scott BS ,&nbsp;George M. Fernandez ,&nbsp;Dorothy Sheu MPH ,&nbsp;Aerielle Belk BS ,&nbsp;Jasmine A. Silvestri MPH ,&nbsp;Jannie Kim MPH ,&nbsp;Scott D. Halpern MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nsenga Farrell EdD, MA","doi":"10.1016/j.chpulm.2024.100127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Tobacco use has a disproportionate impact on older, medically underserved adults. Mobile health (mHealth) tools hold promise for increasing reach of treatment options, yet introduce new barriers to access and use.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>How can investigators incorporate patient and community input into the design and testing of accessible, scalable, and equity-promoting mHealth tobacco treatment tools?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>We present a model for mHealth tobacco treatment tool development using a longitudinal community-partnered design process. We iteratively developed and refined tools used in a large, pragmatic trial. First, a stakeholder advisory committee (SAC) convened with members including individual patients and representatives from patient and health equity advocacy groups, community and government public health services, clinical program leads, and health system and insurance leaders. Second, we conducted a patient needs assessment to confirm or expand on SAC recommendations using semistructured interviews among patients meeting ≥ 1 medically underserved criteria who smoked tobacco daily. Transcribed interviews were coded and analyzed for patterns of patients’ desired design elements.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The SAC recommended key strategies to promote cultural relevance of the tools, maximize engagement of participants, and prevent attrition, which were incorporated into the intervention and trial design. To further refine the approach, we completed interviews with 39 patients from November 2020 to September 2021. Many respondents used telemedicine tools with their clinicians yet were skeptical of their use for tobacco treatment due to lack of facility with mobile technologies. Patients recommended direct support options, avoidance of novel smartphone applications, and customizable features.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>We provide a model for patient-centered design that incorporates community engagement through longitudinal advisors and wider representation of patients. Longitudinal community engagement that incorporates broad patient perspectives facilitates effective development and deployment of mHealth tools to maximize responsiveness to patient and community needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94286,"journal":{"name":"CHEST pulmonary","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST pulmonary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294978922400093X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Tobacco use has a disproportionate impact on older, medically underserved adults. Mobile health (mHealth) tools hold promise for increasing reach of treatment options, yet introduce new barriers to access and use.

Research Question

How can investigators incorporate patient and community input into the design and testing of accessible, scalable, and equity-promoting mHealth tobacco treatment tools?

Study Design and Methods

We present a model for mHealth tobacco treatment tool development using a longitudinal community-partnered design process. We iteratively developed and refined tools used in a large, pragmatic trial. First, a stakeholder advisory committee (SAC) convened with members including individual patients and representatives from patient and health equity advocacy groups, community and government public health services, clinical program leads, and health system and insurance leaders. Second, we conducted a patient needs assessment to confirm or expand on SAC recommendations using semistructured interviews among patients meeting ≥ 1 medically underserved criteria who smoked tobacco daily. Transcribed interviews were coded and analyzed for patterns of patients’ desired design elements.

Results

The SAC recommended key strategies to promote cultural relevance of the tools, maximize engagement of participants, and prevent attrition, which were incorporated into the intervention and trial design. To further refine the approach, we completed interviews with 39 patients from November 2020 to September 2021. Many respondents used telemedicine tools with their clinicians yet were skeptical of their use for tobacco treatment due to lack of facility with mobile technologies. Patients recommended direct support options, avoidance of novel smartphone applications, and customizable features.

Interpretation

We provide a model for patient-centered design that incorporates community engagement through longitudinal advisors and wider representation of patients. Longitudinal community engagement that incorporates broad patient perspectives facilitates effective development and deployment of mHealth tools to maximize responsiveness to patient and community needs.
社区参与发展公平和可扩展的烟草治疗流动卫生工具
背景:烟草使用对医疗服务不足的老年人产生了不成比例的影响。移动医疗(mHealth)工具有望扩大治疗选择的覆盖范围,但也为获取和使用带来了新的障碍。研究问题:调查人员如何将患者和社区的意见纳入可访问、可扩展和促进公平的移动健康烟草治疗工具的设计和测试中?研究设计和方法我们提出了一个使用纵向社区合作设计过程的移动健康烟草治疗工具开发模型。我们迭代地开发和改进了在大型实用试验中使用的工具。首先,利益相关者咨询委员会(SAC)召开会议,其成员包括患者个人和来自患者和健康公平倡导团体、社区和政府公共卫生服务、临床项目领导以及卫生系统和保险领导的代表。其次,我们对满足≥1项医疗服务不足标准且每天吸烟的患者进行了半结构化访谈,以确认或扩展SAC建议的患者需求评估。对记录的访谈进行编码并分析患者期望的设计元素模式。结果SAC推荐了关键策略,以促进工具的文化相关性,最大限度地提高参与者的参与度,并防止人员流失,这些策略已纳入干预和试验设计。为了进一步完善该方法,我们从2020年11月至2021年9月完成了对39名患者的访谈。许多答复者与其临床医生一起使用远程医疗工具,但由于缺乏移动技术设施,他们对将其用于烟草治疗持怀疑态度。患者建议直接支持选项,避免新颖的智能手机应用程序和可定制的功能。我们提供了一个以患者为中心的设计模型,通过纵向顾问和更广泛的患者代表,将社区参与纳入其中。纳入广泛患者观点的纵向社区参与有助于有效开发和部署移动医疗工具,从而最大限度地满足患者和社区的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信