A qualitative exploration of perceptions of the aetiology of preterm birth among pregnant Black women

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Emily Dove-Medows , Jenna M. Wheeler , Lindsey Esparza , Dawn P. Misra , Carmen Giurgescu
{"title":"A qualitative exploration of perceptions of the aetiology of preterm birth among pregnant Black women","authors":"Emily Dove-Medows ,&nbsp;Jenna M. Wheeler ,&nbsp;Lindsey Esparza ,&nbsp;Dawn P. Misra ,&nbsp;Carmen Giurgescu","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Preterm birth (PTB; &lt;37 weeks completed gestation) is a significant public health problem with both acute and long-term ramifications for individuals and families. Despite decades of research, inequities in health outcomes persist in the United States such that Black women are nearly 1.6 times more likely to experience PTB compared to white women. In order to adequately address persistent inequities in PTB, more must be understood from the nuanced experiences of Black women. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore how pregnant Black women perceive the aetiology of PTB.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were collected as part of the Biosocial Impact on Black Birth (BIBB) study which prospectively explored the structural and maternal factors on birth outcomes among self-identified Black women between the ages of 18 and 45 who had singleton pregnancies and were between 8- and 30-weeks’ gestation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted remotely using telephone, were anonymized and transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 61 participants completed interviews. Three main themes developed: (1) Doing Too Much; (2) Black Women Have it Harder; and (3) Patriarchy and Privilege.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is a complex and layered structure in place for Black women which reinforces that the responsibility for PTB belongs to those who experience it the most. Although study participants alluded to the structural vulnerabilities and intersectional stigma, participants turned inward to themselves and to their group identity to explain PTB.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 104365"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613825000841","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Preterm birth (PTB; <37 weeks completed gestation) is a significant public health problem with both acute and long-term ramifications for individuals and families. Despite decades of research, inequities in health outcomes persist in the United States such that Black women are nearly 1.6 times more likely to experience PTB compared to white women. In order to adequately address persistent inequities in PTB, more must be understood from the nuanced experiences of Black women. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore how pregnant Black women perceive the aetiology of PTB.

Methods

Data were collected as part of the Biosocial Impact on Black Birth (BIBB) study which prospectively explored the structural and maternal factors on birth outcomes among self-identified Black women between the ages of 18 and 45 who had singleton pregnancies and were between 8- and 30-weeks’ gestation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted remotely using telephone, were anonymized and transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

A total of 61 participants completed interviews. Three main themes developed: (1) Doing Too Much; (2) Black Women Have it Harder; and (3) Patriarchy and Privilege.

Conclusion

There is a complex and layered structure in place for Black women which reinforces that the responsibility for PTB belongs to those who experience it the most. Although study participants alluded to the structural vulnerabilities and intersectional stigma, participants turned inward to themselves and to their group identity to explain PTB.
对黑人孕妇早产病因的定性探讨
背景:早产(PTB;妊娠37周)是一个重大的公共卫生问题,对个人和家庭既有严重的影响,也有长期的影响。尽管进行了数十年的研究,但在美国,健康结果的不平等仍然存在,例如黑人妇女患肺结核的可能性是白人妇女的近1.6倍。为了充分解决肺结核中持续存在的不平等问题,必须从黑人妇女的微妙经历中了解更多。本定性研究的目的是探讨怀孕黑人妇女如何认识肺结核的病因。方法收集数据作为对黑人生育的生物社会影响(BIBB)研究的一部分,该研究前瞻性地探讨了年龄在18至45岁之间的单胎妊娠,妊娠8至30周之间的自我认同的黑人妇女生育结果的结构和母体因素。使用电话远程进行半结构化访谈,匿名和转录,并使用主题分析进行分析。结果共61名参与者完成访谈。主要有三个主题:(1)做得太多;(2)黑人女性处境艰难;(3)父权制与特权。结论黑人妇女有一个复杂的分层结构,这强化了对肺结核的责任属于那些经历最多的人。虽然研究参与者暗示了结构性脆弱性和交叉污名,但参与者转向自己和他们的群体身份来解释PTB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信