Molecular mechanisms underlying thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus – A Systematic review

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Mads L Larsen , Laura Nørgaard , Petrus Linge , Julie B Larsen , Henrik Z Langkilde , Ellen M Hauge , Steffen Thiel , Anne Voss , Anders Bengtsson , Anne Troldborg
{"title":"Molecular mechanisms underlying thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus – A Systematic review","authors":"Mads L Larsen ,&nbsp;Laura Nørgaard ,&nbsp;Petrus Linge ,&nbsp;Julie B Larsen ,&nbsp;Henrik Z Langkilde ,&nbsp;Ellen M Hauge ,&nbsp;Steffen Thiel ,&nbsp;Anne Voss ,&nbsp;Anders Bengtsson ,&nbsp;Anne Troldborg","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) face an approximately 30 % risk of thrombosis post-diagnosis. However, there remains significant knowledge gaps regarding causative mechanisms, and there is a lack of specific antithrombotic guidelines.</div><div>This systematic review aims to examine the existing literature regarding the mechanisms contributing to thrombosis risk in SLE, focusing on five predefined procoagulant domains: autoantibodies (including antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL)), the complement system, platelets, the endothelium, and the coagulation system. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statements and searched in PubMed and Embase without time restrictions. Risk of bias assessment was performed using a pre-specified evaluation tool.</div><div>Out of 3,747 initially identified publications, 30 studies were included, with 28 demonstrating robust methodological quality in the risk of bias assessment. The studies were experimental, involving blood samples from cross-sectional SLE cohorts, except one animal -and one case-control study. We identified six different thrombosis mechanisms of action. Most studies concentrated on autoantibodies, predominantly aPL. Shared mechanisms between aPL and other autoantibodies may account for the increased thrombosis risk in aPL-negative SLE patients. Significant knowledge gaps remain, particularly regarding the role of the complement system in SLE-related thrombosis. Also, most research relies on cross-sectional designs, emphasizing the need for prospective cohort studies to better assess clinical factors. Finally, comprehensive studies examining the interactions between multiple procoagulant factors and their link to thrombosis are lacking. Closing these gaps in future research could improve both preventive and personalized treatment strategies for thrombosis in SLE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 152707"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017225000782","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) face an approximately 30 % risk of thrombosis post-diagnosis. However, there remains significant knowledge gaps regarding causative mechanisms, and there is a lack of specific antithrombotic guidelines.
This systematic review aims to examine the existing literature regarding the mechanisms contributing to thrombosis risk in SLE, focusing on five predefined procoagulant domains: autoantibodies (including antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL)), the complement system, platelets, the endothelium, and the coagulation system. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statements and searched in PubMed and Embase without time restrictions. Risk of bias assessment was performed using a pre-specified evaluation tool.
Out of 3,747 initially identified publications, 30 studies were included, with 28 demonstrating robust methodological quality in the risk of bias assessment. The studies were experimental, involving blood samples from cross-sectional SLE cohorts, except one animal -and one case-control study. We identified six different thrombosis mechanisms of action. Most studies concentrated on autoantibodies, predominantly aPL. Shared mechanisms between aPL and other autoantibodies may account for the increased thrombosis risk in aPL-negative SLE patients. Significant knowledge gaps remain, particularly regarding the role of the complement system in SLE-related thrombosis. Also, most research relies on cross-sectional designs, emphasizing the need for prospective cohort studies to better assess clinical factors. Finally, comprehensive studies examining the interactions between multiple procoagulant factors and their link to thrombosis are lacking. Closing these gaps in future research could improve both preventive and personalized treatment strategies for thrombosis in SLE.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信