Prediction of early recurrence as a marker of surgical futility in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Davide Citterio , Michele Droz dit Busset , Carlo Sposito , Michele Mazzola , Samuele Grandi , Andrea Zironda , Giuseppe Leoncini , Nicolò Simonotti , Carlo Battiston , Maria Flores , Giovanni Ferrari , Vincenzo Mazzaferro
{"title":"Prediction of early recurrence as a marker of surgical futility in pancreatic adenocarcinoma","authors":"Davide Citterio ,&nbsp;Michele Droz dit Busset ,&nbsp;Carlo Sposito ,&nbsp;Michele Mazzola ,&nbsp;Samuele Grandi ,&nbsp;Andrea Zironda ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Leoncini ,&nbsp;Nicolò Simonotti ,&nbsp;Carlo Battiston ,&nbsp;Maria Flores ,&nbsp;Giovanni Ferrari ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Mazzaferro","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2025.102208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Long-term survival after resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is impaired by very high recurrence rates. When recurrence occurs within 6 months (early recurrence: ER) the benefit of surgery is equivalent to palliative chemotherapy in unresectable patients. Therefore, ER is a surrogate of surgical futility in PDAC.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>To investigate predictive factors of ER and its impact on survival, a training and a validation cohort of prospectively collected patients who underwent surgery for resectable or borderline-resectable PDAC were analyzed in two independent Pancreas Units during the same period. Logistic regression model on the training cohort identified independent predictors of ER, used to build a prognostic risk-score then tested on the validation cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 176 patients in the training cohort, 21.6 % experienced ER, with significant impact on survival (OS: 9.7 months vs. 32.7 months for ER vs. late/no recurrence, respectively). At multivariable analysis, three independent risk factors for ER were identified: Ca19.9 &gt; 100 U/mL, G3 tumors and lack of adjuvant chemotherapy. Based on such features the derived ER-score stratified three prognostic classes at incremental risk of ER (12 %, 35 % and 53 %) with different OS (31.1, 19.7 and 9.3 months, respectively, p &lt; 0.001). The ER predictive score was then tested on a validation cohort of 242 patients, 22.3 % of whom underwent ER. Despite significant differences in tumor-related features, the score was able to discriminate among the predicted ER-risk classes (15 %, 27 % and 53 %, respectively) and forecast significantly different OS (5.8, 19 and 31.1 months, p &gt; 0.001). The discriminative capability of the score in the two cohorts was similar (training AUC = 0.72 vs. validation AUC = 0.68, p = 0.28).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>An externally validated clinical score, able to identify three prognostic classes at incremental risk of developing ER after resection of PDAC is provided. In patients at high risk of ER, prediction of surgical futility may help in decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 102208"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740425000234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Long-term survival after resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is impaired by very high recurrence rates. When recurrence occurs within 6 months (early recurrence: ER) the benefit of surgery is equivalent to palliative chemotherapy in unresectable patients. Therefore, ER is a surrogate of surgical futility in PDAC.

Materials and methods

To investigate predictive factors of ER and its impact on survival, a training and a validation cohort of prospectively collected patients who underwent surgery for resectable or borderline-resectable PDAC were analyzed in two independent Pancreas Units during the same period. Logistic regression model on the training cohort identified independent predictors of ER, used to build a prognostic risk-score then tested on the validation cohort.

Results

Out of 176 patients in the training cohort, 21.6 % experienced ER, with significant impact on survival (OS: 9.7 months vs. 32.7 months for ER vs. late/no recurrence, respectively). At multivariable analysis, three independent risk factors for ER were identified: Ca19.9 > 100 U/mL, G3 tumors and lack of adjuvant chemotherapy. Based on such features the derived ER-score stratified three prognostic classes at incremental risk of ER (12 %, 35 % and 53 %) with different OS (31.1, 19.7 and 9.3 months, respectively, p < 0.001). The ER predictive score was then tested on a validation cohort of 242 patients, 22.3 % of whom underwent ER. Despite significant differences in tumor-related features, the score was able to discriminate among the predicted ER-risk classes (15 %, 27 % and 53 %, respectively) and forecast significantly different OS (5.8, 19 and 31.1 months, p > 0.001). The discriminative capability of the score in the two cohorts was similar (training AUC = 0.72 vs. validation AUC = 0.68, p = 0.28).

Conclusion

An externally validated clinical score, able to identify three prognostic classes at incremental risk of developing ER after resection of PDAC is provided. In patients at high risk of ER, prediction of surgical futility may help in decision-making.
预测胰腺癌早期复发作为手术失败的标志
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical Oncology-Oxford
Surgical Oncology-Oxford 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
169
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Surgical Oncology is a peer reviewed journal publishing review articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in surgical oncology and related fields of interest. Articles represent a spectrum of current technology in oncology research as well as those concerning clinical trials, surgical technique, methods of investigation and patient evaluation. Surgical Oncology publishes comprehensive Reviews that examine individual topics in considerable detail, in addition to editorials and commentaries which focus on selected papers. The journal also publishes special issues which explore topics of interest to surgical oncologists in great detail - outlining recent advancements and providing readers with the most up to date information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信