A comparative framework for evaluating machine learning models in forecasting electricity demand for port microgrids

IF 9.6 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Alexander Micallef , Maurice Apap , John Licari , Cyril Spiteri Staines , Zhaoxia Xiao
{"title":"A comparative framework for evaluating machine learning models in forecasting electricity demand for port microgrids","authors":"Alexander Micallef ,&nbsp;Maurice Apap ,&nbsp;John Licari ,&nbsp;Cyril Spiteri Staines ,&nbsp;Zhaoxia Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.egyai.2025.100494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a framework for forecasting electricity demand in port microgrids using advanced machine learning models, including Random Forest, Least Squares Boosting Ensemble, and Gaussian Process Regression. These models were evaluated under different forecasting setups (fixed origin, expanding windows, and rolling windows) and compared against simpler baseline methods, such as Linear Regression and Naive models. The study assessed the effectiveness of machine learning models in handling dynamic electricity demand patterns in port environments and highlighted the advantages of data-driven models. Results indicate that the Random Forest (expanding window) model outperforms the other models, achieving a root mean square error of 1.1848 MW and a mean average percentage error of 7.2483 %. Gaussian Process Regression with Exponential kernel follows closely with a root mean square error of 1.1904 MW and a mean average percentage error of 7.5017 %. In contrast, the Naive Method (previous day) shows the poorest performance with a root mean square error of 4.5357 MW and a mean average percentage error of 18.1485 %. Partial Dependence Plots reveal that features such as weighted port calls play a significant role in improving prediction accuracy. These findings highlight the effectiveness of machine learning models in accurately forecasting port microgrid demand and optimizing energy management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34138,"journal":{"name":"Energy and AI","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100494"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666546825000266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a framework for forecasting electricity demand in port microgrids using advanced machine learning models, including Random Forest, Least Squares Boosting Ensemble, and Gaussian Process Regression. These models were evaluated under different forecasting setups (fixed origin, expanding windows, and rolling windows) and compared against simpler baseline methods, such as Linear Regression and Naive models. The study assessed the effectiveness of machine learning models in handling dynamic electricity demand patterns in port environments and highlighted the advantages of data-driven models. Results indicate that the Random Forest (expanding window) model outperforms the other models, achieving a root mean square error of 1.1848 MW and a mean average percentage error of 7.2483 %. Gaussian Process Regression with Exponential kernel follows closely with a root mean square error of 1.1904 MW and a mean average percentage error of 7.5017 %. In contrast, the Naive Method (previous day) shows the poorest performance with a root mean square error of 4.5357 MW and a mean average percentage error of 18.1485 %. Partial Dependence Plots reveal that features such as weighted port calls play a significant role in improving prediction accuracy. These findings highlight the effectiveness of machine learning models in accurately forecasting port microgrid demand and optimizing energy management.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and AI
Energy and AI Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信