An exploratory study on municipal measures for preventing and addressing incidents of missing older persons with dementia living alone in Japan.

Kazunori Kikuchi, Tatsuya Ooguchi, Tomoko Ikeuchi, Shuichi Awata
{"title":"An exploratory study on municipal measures for preventing and addressing incidents of missing older persons with dementia living alone in Japan.","authors":"Kazunori Kikuchi, Tatsuya Ooguchi, Tomoko Ikeuchi, Shuichi Awata","doi":"10.1111/psyg.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is predicted that the number of older persons with dementia (PwD) living alone in Japan will increase in the future. Consequently, it is also expected that the number of missing older PwD living alone will rise. However, there is little research on missing PwD who live alone. The aim of this study was to clarify the framework of measures that are deemed necessary by municipalities when older PwD who are living alone go missing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mail survey was conducted among 1741 municipalities, and we asked about the necessity of 22 measures to address the issue of missing PwD who are living alone. A total of 478 municipalities with no missing values in the analyzed variables were included in the analysis, and factor analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following five factors were extracted: collaboration (Factor 1), prior agreement (Factor 2), the SOS network (Factor 3), information and communication technology-based solutions (Factor 4), and policy guidelines or protocol frameworks (Factor 5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Each of the five factors was unique. The strategies for dealing with missing persons include both relatively easy and challenging measures. Municipalities that have not yet made significant progress should begin with the easier measures and gradually implement the more challenging measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":74597,"journal":{"name":"Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society","volume":"25 3","pages":"e70022"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11903103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyg.70022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is predicted that the number of older persons with dementia (PwD) living alone in Japan will increase in the future. Consequently, it is also expected that the number of missing older PwD living alone will rise. However, there is little research on missing PwD who live alone. The aim of this study was to clarify the framework of measures that are deemed necessary by municipalities when older PwD who are living alone go missing.

Methods: A mail survey was conducted among 1741 municipalities, and we asked about the necessity of 22 measures to address the issue of missing PwD who are living alone. A total of 478 municipalities with no missing values in the analyzed variables were included in the analysis, and factor analysis was conducted.

Results: The following five factors were extracted: collaboration (Factor 1), prior agreement (Factor 2), the SOS network (Factor 3), information and communication technology-based solutions (Factor 4), and policy guidelines or protocol frameworks (Factor 5).

Conclusion: Each of the five factors was unique. The strategies for dealing with missing persons include both relatively easy and challenging measures. Municipalities that have not yet made significant progress should begin with the easier measures and gradually implement the more challenging measures.

日本城市预防和处理失智独居老人事件措施的探索性研究。
背景:据预测,未来日本独居的老年痴呆症患者(PwD)数量将会增加。因此,孤身一人失踪的老年残疾人人数预计也会增加。然而,关于独居的失踪残疾人的研究却很少。这项研究的目的是澄清市政当局在独居的老年残疾人失踪时认为必要的措施框架。方法:对全国1741个地市进行邮件调查,询问22项措施解决孤寡残疾人失踪问题的必要性。选取分析变量中无缺失值的478个城市纳入分析,进行因子分析。结果:提取了以下五个因素:协作(因素1)、事先协议(因素2)、SOS网络(因素3)、基于信息和通信技术的解决方案(因素4)和政策指南或协议框架(因素5)。结论:五个因素中的每一个都是独特的。处理失踪人员的战略既包括相对容易的措施,也包括具有挑战性的措施。尚未取得重大进展的市政当局应从较容易的措施开始,逐步实施较具挑战性的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信