Early functional proprioceptive stimulation in high spinal cord injury: a pilot study.

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION
Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2025-02-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2025.1490904
Florence Martinache, Anne-Claire de Crouy, Arnaud Boutin, Jacques Duranteau, Bernard Vigué
{"title":"Early functional proprioceptive stimulation in high spinal cord injury: a pilot study.","authors":"Florence Martinache, Anne-Claire de Crouy, Arnaud Boutin, Jacques Duranteau, Bernard Vigué","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2025.1490904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The first months following a spinal cord injury (SCI) are crucial for promoting recovery. However, patients with high SCIs often require prolonged stays in intensive care units (ICUs), delaying optimal rehabilitation due to limited resources. This study examined the safety, feasibility, and effects on spasticity and muscle atrophy of an early rehabilitation technique using non-invasive sensory stimulation and called functional proprioceptive stimulation (FPS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ten SCI patients were included in this randomized pilot study, with five receiving early FPS and five receiving sham stimulation. Both groups were treated using the Vibramoov, consisting of 12 computer-synchronized vibrators placed on the lower limbs. Treatment sessions lasted 30 min, four times a week, for up to 8 weeks. Spasticity was assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale, Tardieu Scale, Spinal Cord Assessment Tool for Spastic Reflexes, and a patient self-evaluation with a visual analog scale. Muscle atrophy was evaluated through ultrasonography of rectus femoris thickness and cross-sectional area. The duration of the follow-up period ranged from 6 months to 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment began early, with a median of 4 days post-injury for both groups. The number of adverse events was similar between groups, with none linked to the intervention. No medium-term effects on spasticity or muscle atrophy could be identified. However, our results show a tendency toward a beneficial short-term effect of FPS on spasticity, observed for all spasticity measurements.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This pilot study shows that early FPS is feasible and safe for SCI as early as the intensive care unit stage. We demonstrated that FPS induced a transient relaxation and spasticity reduction that could potentially enhance a rehabilitation session administered shortly after it, but larger studies are needed to determine the medium and long-term effects.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier (NCT05094752).</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":"6 ","pages":"1490904"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2025.1490904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The first months following a spinal cord injury (SCI) are crucial for promoting recovery. However, patients with high SCIs often require prolonged stays in intensive care units (ICUs), delaying optimal rehabilitation due to limited resources. This study examined the safety, feasibility, and effects on spasticity and muscle atrophy of an early rehabilitation technique using non-invasive sensory stimulation and called functional proprioceptive stimulation (FPS).

Materials and methods: Ten SCI patients were included in this randomized pilot study, with five receiving early FPS and five receiving sham stimulation. Both groups were treated using the Vibramoov, consisting of 12 computer-synchronized vibrators placed on the lower limbs. Treatment sessions lasted 30 min, four times a week, for up to 8 weeks. Spasticity was assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale, Tardieu Scale, Spinal Cord Assessment Tool for Spastic Reflexes, and a patient self-evaluation with a visual analog scale. Muscle atrophy was evaluated through ultrasonography of rectus femoris thickness and cross-sectional area. The duration of the follow-up period ranged from 6 months to 1 year.

Results: Treatment began early, with a median of 4 days post-injury for both groups. The number of adverse events was similar between groups, with none linked to the intervention. No medium-term effects on spasticity or muscle atrophy could be identified. However, our results show a tendency toward a beneficial short-term effect of FPS on spasticity, observed for all spasticity measurements.

Discussion: This pilot study shows that early FPS is feasible and safe for SCI as early as the intensive care unit stage. We demonstrated that FPS induced a transient relaxation and spasticity reduction that could potentially enhance a rehabilitation session administered shortly after it, but larger studies are needed to determine the medium and long-term effects.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier (NCT05094752).

高位脊髓损伤早期功能性本体感觉刺激:一项初步研究。
简介:脊髓损伤(SCI)后的头几个月对促进康复至关重要。然而,高SCIs患者通常需要在重症监护病房(icu)停留较长时间,由于资源有限,延迟了最佳康复。本研究探讨了一种使用非侵入性感觉刺激(称为功能性本体感觉刺激(FPS))的早期康复技术的安全性、可行性和对痉挛和肌肉萎缩的影响。材料与方法:本研究随机选取10例SCI患者,其中5例接受早期FPS, 5例接受假刺激。两组患者均使用Vibramoov进行治疗,该装置由12个电脑同步振动器组成,放置在患者的下肢。治疗时间为30分钟,每周4次,持续8周。采用改良Ashworth量表、Tardieu量表、脊髓痉挛反射评估工具和患者视觉模拟量表进行自我评估。通过超声检查股直肌厚度和横截面积来评估肌萎缩情况。随访时间为6个月至1年。结果:两组患者均较早开始治疗,中位时间为伤后4天。两组之间不良事件的数量相似,与干预无关。未发现对痉挛或肌肉萎缩的中期影响。然而,我们的研究结果显示,在所有的痉挛测量中,FPS对痉挛有有利的短期影响。讨论:这项初步研究表明,早在重症监护室阶段,早期FPS对脊髓损伤是可行和安全的。我们证明FPS诱导了短暂的放松和痉挛的减少,这可能会在不久后加强康复治疗,但需要更大规模的研究来确定中期和长期的影响。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符(NCT05094752)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信